helmholtzeyeinstituteРоссийский офтальмологический журналRussian Ophthalmological Journal2072-00762587-5760Real time Publishers10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-3-141-146helmholtzeyeinstitute-1312Research ArticleОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫREVIEWSПротезирование роговицы: от прошлого к будущемуKeratoprostheses: from the past to the futureГрищенкоМ. В.GrishchenkoM. V.

Максим Валерьевич Грищенко - врач-офтальмолог хирургического отделения № 1

ул. Красных Партизан, д. 6, Краснодар, 350012

Maksim V. Grishchenko - ophthalmologist, surgical department № 1

6, Krasnykh Partizan St., Krasnodar, 350012

maxigomax@gmail.comМясниковаВ. В.MyasnikovaV. V.

Виктория Владимировна Мясникова - д-р мед. наук, заместитель директора по научной работе, доцент кафедры анестезиологии, реаниматологии и трансфузиологии

ул. Митрофана Седина, д. 4, Краснодар, 350063

Viktoriya V. Myasnikova - Dr. of Med Sci., deputy director for research, associate professor of chair of anesthesiology, resuscitation and transfusiology

6, Krasnykh Partizan St., Krasnodar, 350012

4, Mitrofan Sedin St., Krasnodar, 350063

НефедовД. А.NefedovD. A.

Денис Анатольевич Нефедов - канд. мед. наук, заведующий хирургическим отделением № 21

ул. Красных Партизан, д. 6, Краснодар, 350012

Denis A. Nefedov - Cand. of Med Sci., head of surgical department № 2

6, Krasnykh Partizan St., Krasnodar, 350012

КФ ФГАУ НМИЦ «МНТК "Микрохирургия глаза" им. академика С.Н. Федорова» Минздрава РоссииРоссияS.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Clinic, Krasnodar BranchRussian FederationКФ ФГАУ НМИЦ «МНТК "Микрохирургия глаза" им. академика С.Н. Федорова» Минздрава России; ФГБОУ ВО «Кубанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава РоссииРоссияS.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Clinic, Krasnodar Branch; Kuban State Medical UniversityRussian Federation202312102023163141146Copyright © Грищенко М.В., Мясникова В.В., Нефедов Д.А., 20232023Грищенко М.В., Мясникова В.В., Нефедов Д.А.Grishchenko M.V., Myasnikova V.V., Nefedov D.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/1312

В обзоре представлены применяемые на сегодняшний день в разных странах модели кератопротезов, их эффективность, разработки и концептуальные модели, а также перспективы развития и тенденции кератопротезирования и мире.

The review outlines the models of keratoprostheses currently used in various countries and their effectiveness, conceptual models under development, prospects and trends in keratoprosthetics observed in the world.

кератопротезированиебиокератопротезискусственная роговицаkeratoprostheticsbiokeratoprosthesesartificial corneaReferencesФилатов В.П., Бушмич Д.Г. Выработка категорий бельм для пересадки роговой оболочки. Офтальмологический журнал. 1947; 2: 9-14.Filatov V.P., Bushmich D.G. Development of categories of thorns for corneal transplantation. Ophthalmological journal. 1947; 2: 9-14 (In Russ.)Moffatt SL, Cartwright VA, Stumpf TH. Centennial review of corneal transplantation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33:642–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01134.xMoffatt SL, Cartwright VA, Stumpf TH. Centennial review of corneal transplantation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33:642–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01134.xDarwin EA. History of ophthalmology series. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 45:508–13. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(08)00351-6Darwin EA. History of ophthalmology series. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 45:508–13. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(08)00351-6Chirila TV, Hicks CR. The origins of the artificial cornea: Pellier de Quengsy and his contributions to the modern concept of keratoprosthesis. Gesnerus. 1999; 56:96–106. PMID: 10432778Chirila TV, Hicks CR. The origins of the artificial cornea: Pellier de Quengsy and his contributions to the modern concept of keratoprosthesis. Gesnerus. 1999; 56:96–106. PMID: 10432778De Quengsy GP. Des Herrn D. Pellier de Quengsy. Sammlung von Aufsätzen und Wahrnehmungensowohlüber die Fehler der Augen, als der Theile, die sieumgeben Junius. Leipzig: Junius.1789.De Quengsy GP. Des Herrn D. Pellier de Quengsy. Sammlung von Aufsätzen und Wahrnehmungensowohlüber die Fehler der Augen, als der Theile, die sieumgeben Junius. Leipzig: Junius.1789.Nusbaum N. Cornea articialis, ein Substitut fur die Transplantation Cornea. Deutsche Klinik. 1853.Nusbaum N. Cornea articialis, ein Substitut fur die Transplantation Cornea. Deutsche Klinik. 1853.Федоров С.Н., Мороз З.И., Зуев В.К. Кератопротезирование. Москва: Медицина, 1982.Fedorov S.N., Moroz Z.I., Zuev V.K. Keratoprosthetics. Moscow: Meditsina, 1982. (In Russ.).Chirila TV, Constable J, Crawford GJ, et al. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) sponges as implant materials: in vivo and in vitro evaluation of cellular invasion. Biomaterials. 1993;14(1):26-38. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90072-aChirila TV, Constable J, Crawford GJ, et al. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) sponges as implant materials: in vivo and in vitro evaluation of cellular invasion. Biomaterials. 1993;14(1):26-38. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90072-aChoyce DP. Perforating and non-perforating acrylic corneal implants, including the Choyce 2-piece perforating kerato-prosthesis. Ophthalmologica. 1969;158 Suppl:292-300. PMID: 5359727.Choyce DP. Perforating and non-perforating acrylic corneal implants, including the Choyce 2-piece perforating kerato-prosthesis. Ophthalmologica. 1969;158 Suppl:292-300. PMID: 5359727.Choyse DP. Evolution of the Choyce 2-piece multistage perforating keratoprosthesis technique. 1967–1978. Ann Ophthalmol. 12: 740-3.Choyse DP. Evolution of the Choyce 2-piece multistage perforating keratoprosthesis technique. 1967–1978. Ann Ophthalmol. 12: 740-3.Cardona H. Hushroom transcorneal keratoprosthesis (bolt and nut). Am J Ophthalmol. 1969 Oct;68(4):604-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(69)91239-2Cardona H. Hushroom transcorneal keratoprosthesis (bolt and nut). Am J Ophthalmol. 1969 Oct;68(4):604-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(69)91239-2Альдаве Э., Малюгин Б.Э., Ковшун Е.В., Власова В.А. Результаты имплантации бостонского кератопротеза 1 типа пациентам с ожоговымии дистрофическими бельмами 4-5 категории. Офтальмохирургия. 2013; (3):6-11.Aldave A.J., Malyugin B.E., Kovshun E.V., Vlasova V.A. The Boston Type I K-PRO implantation results in patients with burn and dystrophic leucoma of 4-5th stage. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery.2013; 3:6-11. (In Russ.).Мороз З.И., Власова В.А., Ковшун Е.В. История кератопротезирования в МНТК «Микрохирургия глаза» имени академика С.Н. Федорова. Офтальмохирургия. 2013; 4: 50-5.Moroz Z.I., Vlasova V.A., Kovshun E.V.. The history of keratoprosthetics in the academician S.N. Fyodorov ISTC NRMC «Eye Microsurgery». Ophthalmosurgery. 2013; 4: 50-5. (In Russ.).Мороз З.И. Достижения школы С.Н.Федорова в области кератопластики и кератопротезирования. Офтальмохирургия. 2007; 1: 22-5.Moroz Z.I. Achievements of S.N. Fedorov in the field of keratoplasty and keratoprosthetics. Ophthalmosurgery. 2007; 1: 22-5. (in Russ.).Малюгин Б.Э., Борзенок С.А., Koвшун Е.В. и др. Оценка морфологических изменений роговицы кролика при имплантации новой модели кератопротеза. Вестник офтальмологии. 2020; 5: 136(5):77 86. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202013605177Malyugin BE, Borzenok SA, Kovshun EV, et al. Morphological changes in rabbit cornea after implantation of a new keratoprosthesis supporting plate. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2020; 136(5):77 86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202013605177Dohlman CH, Harissi-Dagher M, Graney J. The Boston keratoprosthesis: a new threadless design. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2007;13(3):1–5.Dohlman CH, Harissi-Dagher M, Graney J. The Boston keratoprosthesis: a new threadless design. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2007;13(3):1–5.Shihadeh WA, Mohidat HM. Outcomes of the Boston keratoprosthesis in Jordan. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan-Mar; 19(1): 97–100. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.92123Shihadeh WA, Mohidat HM. Outcomes of the Boston keratoprosthesis in Jordan. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan-Mar; 19(1): 97–100. doi:10.4103/0974-9233.92123Sivaraman KR, Hou JH, Allemann N, de la Cruz J, Cortina MS. Retroprosthetic membrane and risk of sterile keratolysis in patients with type I Boston Keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 May; 155(5):814-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.019Sivaraman KR, Hou JH, Allemann N, de la Cruz J, Cortina MS. Retroprosthetic membrane and risk of sterile keratolysis in patients with type I Boston Keratoprosthesis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 May; 155(5):814-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.019Liu C, Okera S, Tandon R, et al. Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: results from the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92:1211–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.130567Liu C, Okera S, Tandon R, et al. Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: results from the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92:1211–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.130567De la Paz MF, Salvador-Culla B, Charoenrook V, et al. Osteo-odonto-, tibial bone and Boston keratoprosthesis in clinically comparable cases of chemical injury and autoimmune disease. Ocul Surf. 2019; 17:476–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.04.006De la Paz MF, Salvador-Culla B, Charoenrook V, et al. Osteo-odonto-, tibial bone and Boston keratoprosthesis in clinically comparable cases of chemical injury and autoimmune disease. Ocul Surf. 2019; 17:476–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.04.006Tan A, Tan DT, Tan XW, Mehta JS. Osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis: systematic review of surgical outcomes and complication rates. Ocul Surf. 2012; 10:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2012.01.003Tan A, Tan DT, Tan XW, Mehta JS. Osteo-odontokeratoprosthesis: systematic review of surgical outcomes and complication rates. Ocul Surf. 2012; 10:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2012.01.003Hicks CR, Crawford GJ, Dart JKG. AlphaCor - Clinical outcomes. Cornea. 2006; 25(9): 1034 – 42. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000229982.23334.6bHicks CR, Crawford GJ, Dart JKG. AlphaCor - Clinical outcomes. Cornea. 2006; 25(9): 1034 – 42. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000229982.23334.6bHicks CR, Crawford GJ, Lou X, et al. Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor: device, preliminary outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond). 2003 Apr;17(3):385-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700333.Hicks CR, Crawford GJ, Lou X, et al. Corneal replacement using a synthetic hydrogel cornea, AlphaCor: device, preliminary outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond). 2003 Apr;17(3):385-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700333Hicks CR, Crawford GJ. Indications and technique: AlphaCor artificial cornea. Tech Ophthalmol. 2003; 1: 151–5. doi: 10.1097/00145756-200309000-00004Hicks CR, Crawford GJ. Indications and technique: AlphaCor artificial cornea. Tech Ophthalmol. 2003; 1: 151–5. doi: 10.1097/00145756-200309000-00004Jiraskova N, Rozsival P, Burova M, Kalfertova M. AlphaCor artificial cornea: clinical outcome. Eye (Lond). 2011; 25:1138–46. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.122Jiraskova N, Rozsival P, Burova M, Kalfertova M. AlphaCor artificial cornea: clinical outcome. Eye (Lond). 2011; 25:1138–46. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.122Crawford GJ. The development and results of an artificial cornea: AlphaCor™. In: Chirila TV, Harkin DG, eds. Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine in Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing. 2016.Crawford GJ. The development and results of an artificial cornea: AlphaCor™. In: Chirila TV, Harkin DG, eds. Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine in Ophthalmology. 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing. 2016.Hicks CR, Chirila TV, Werner L, et al. Deposits in artificial corneas: risk factors and prevention. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004; 32:185–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00781.xHicks CR, Chirila TV, Werner L, et al. Deposits in artificial corneas: risk factors and prevention. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004; 32:185–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00781.xLitvin G, Klein I, Litvin Y, Klaiman G, Nyska A. CorNeat KPro: Ocular implantation study in rabbits. Cornea. 2021 Sep 1;40(9):1165-74. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002798Litvin G, Klein I, Litvin Y, Klaiman G, Nyska A. CorNeat KPro: Ocular implantation study in rabbits. Cornea. 2021 Sep 1;40(9):1165-74. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002798Legeais JM, Renard G, Pouliquen Y. Novel biocolonizable intrastromal keratoprosthesis. First year study in human. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34 (Suppl): 1367-74.Legeais JM, Renard G, Pouliquen Y. Novel biocolonizable intrastromal keratoprosthesis. First year study in human. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34 (Suppl): 1367-74.Hollick EJ, Watson SL, Dart JK, Luthert PJ, Allan BD. Legeais BioKpro III keratoprosthesis implantation: long term results in seven patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;90(9):1146-51. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.092510Hollick EJ, Watson SL, Dart JK, Luthert PJ, Allan BD. Legeais BioKpro III keratoprosthesis implantation: long term results in seven patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;90(9):1146-51. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.092510Alió JL, Mulet ME, Haroun H, Merayo J, Ruiz Moreno JM. Five year follow up of biocolonisable microporous fluorocarbon haptic (BIOKOP) keratoprosthesis implantation in patients with high risk of corneal graft failure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;88(12):1585-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.046375Alió JL, Mulet ME, Haroun H, Merayo J, Ruiz Moreno JM. Five year follow up of biocolonisable microporous fluorocarbon haptic (BIOKOP) keratoprosthesis implantation in patients with high risk of corneal graft failure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;88(12):1585-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.046375Xiang J, Sun J, Hong J, et al. T-style keratoprosthesis based on surface-modified poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel for cornea. MaterSciEngCMaterBiolAppl. 2015; 50: 274–85. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.089Xiang J, Sun J, Hong J, et al. T-style keratoprosthesis based on surface-modified poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogel for cornea. MaterSciEngCMaterBiolAppl. 2015; 50: 274–85. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.089Sharifi S, Islam MM, Sharifi H, et al. Sputter deposition of titanium on poly(methyl methacrylate) enhances corneal biocompatibility. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020; 9:41. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.13.41Sharifi S, Islam MM, Sharifi H, et al. Sputter deposition of titanium on poly(methyl methacrylate) enhances corneal biocompatibility. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020; 9:41. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.13.41Li L, Jiang H, Wang LQ, Huang YF. Experimental study on the biocompatibility of keratoprosthesis with improved titanium implant. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11:1741–5. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.11.02Li L, Jiang H, Wang LQ, Huang YF. Experimental study on the biocompatibility of keratoprosthesis with improved titanium implant. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11:1741–5. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.11.02Liqiang W, Kyung JJ, Homer HC, et al. Hydroxyapatite for keratoprosthesis biointegration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 22;52(10):7392-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7601Liqiang W, Kyung JJ, Homer HC, et al. Hydroxyapatite for keratoprosthesis biointegration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 22;52(10):7392-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-7601Калинников Ю.Ю. Современные подходы к решению проблем кератопротезирования. Рефракционная хирургия и офтальмология. 2004; 4(20): 54-62.Kalinnikov Yu.Yu. Modern approaches to solving the problems of keratoprosthetics. Refraktsionnaya khirurgia I oftal’mologia. 2004; 4(20): 54-62 (In Russ.).Holland G, Pandit A, Sánchez-Abella L, et al. Artificial cornea: Past, current, and future directions. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 12;8:770780. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.770780Holland G, Pandit A, Sánchez-Abella L, et al. Artificial cornea: Past, current, and future directions. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 12;8:770780. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.770780Iyer G, Srinivasan B, Agarwal S. Keratoprosthesis: Current global scenario and a broad Indian perspective. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66(5): 620-9. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_22_18Iyer G, Srinivasan B, Agarwal S. Keratoprosthesis: Current global scenario and a broad Indian perspective. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018; 66(5): 620-9. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_22_18Fernandez-Perez J, Ahearne M. Decellularisation and recellularisation of cornea: progress towards a donor alternative. Methods. 2020; 171:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.05.009Fernandez-Perez J, Ahearne M. Decellularisation and recellularisation of cornea: progress towards a donor alternative. Methods. 2020; 171:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.05.009Rama P, Matuska S, Paganoni G, et al. Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:147–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905955Rama P, Matuska S, Paganoni G, et al. Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:147–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905955Alio Del Barrio JL, El Zarif M, Azaar A, et al. Corneal stroma enhancement with decellularised stromal laminas with or without stem cell recellularisation for advanced keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 186:47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.026Alio Del Barrio JL, El Zarif M, Azaar A, et al. Corneal stroma enhancement with decellularised stromal laminas with or without stem cell recellularisation for advanced keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 186:47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.10.026Chen Z, You J, Liu X, et al. Biomaterials for corneal bioengineering. Biomed Mater. 2018; 13:032002. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa92d2Chen Z, You J, Liu X, et al. Biomaterials for corneal bioengineering. Biomed Mater. 2018; 13:032002. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa92d2Griffith M., Poudel BK, Malhotra K, et al. Biosynthetic alternatives for corneal transplant surgery. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. (2020) 15:129–43. doi: 10.1080/17469899.2020.1754798Griffith M., Poudel BK, Malhotra K, et al. Biosynthetic alternatives for corneal transplant surgery. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. (2020; ) 15:129–43. doi: 10.1080/17469899.2020.1754798Mi S, Chen B, Wright B, Connon CJ. Plastic compression of a collagen gel forms a much improved scaffold for ocular surface tissue engineering over conventional collagen gels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 95:447–53. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32861Mi S, Chen B, Wright B, Connon CJ. Plastic compression of a collagen gel forms a much improved scaffold for ocular surface tissue engineering over conventional collagen gels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010; 95:447–53. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32861Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ. 3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res. 2018; 173:188–93. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.05.010Isaacson A, Swioklo S, Connon CJ. 3D bioprinting of a corneal stroma equivalent. Exp Eye Res. 2018; 173:188–93. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.05.010Ulag S, Ilhan E, Sahin A, et al. 3D printed artificial cornea for corneal stromal transplantation. EurPolymer J. 2020; 133:109744. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109744Ulag S, Ilhan E, Sahin A, et al. 3D printed artificial cornea for corneal stromal transplantation. EurPolymer J. 2020; 133:109744. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109744Малюгин Б.Э., Борзенок С.А., Комах Ю.А. и др. Современные возможности клеточных технологий в конструировании биологического эквивалента искусственной роговицы. Сибирский научный медицинский журнал. 2014; 34(5): 43-7.Malyugin B.E., Borzenok S.A., Komakh U.A., et al. Modern possibilities of cellular technologies in designing the biological equivalent of an artificial cornea. Siberian scientific medical journal. 2014; 34(5): 43-7. (in Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.