helmholtzeyeinstituteРоссийский офтальмологический журналRussian Ophthalmological Journal2072-00762587-5760Real time Publishers10.21516/2072-0076-2026-19-1-44-50helmholtzeyeinstitute-2046Research ArticleКЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯCLINICAL STUDIESКачество жизни пациентов после кераторефракционной хирургииQuality of life of patients after keratorefractive surgeryhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1265-1137АсгерМ.AsgherM.

Мехмона Асгер — магистр общественного здравоохранения, руководитель редакционного и издательского отдела

Равалпинди, 46000

Mehmona Asgher — MPH, CMEJ, Manager Editorial and Publication Department ASJO

Rawalpindi, 46000

memonaasgher@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3127-8315ХаннанA.HannanA.

Абдул Ханнан — FCPS, FCPS-VR, MRCS (Эдинбург), MRCS (Глазго), FICO (офтальмология), консультант, отделение сетчатки

Равалпинди, 46000

Abdul Hannan — FCPS, FCPS-VR, MRCS (Edinburg), MRCS(Glasgow), FICO (Ophthalmology), Consultant, Retina Department

Rawalpindi, 46000

Глазная больница Аль-Шифа ТрастПакистанAl-Shifa Trust Eye HospitalPakistan2026050420261914450Copyright © Асгер М., Ханнан A., 20262026Асгер М., Ханнан A.Asgher M., Hannan A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/2046

Цель работы — оценить качество жизни (КЖ) пациентов, перенесших кераторефракционную хирургию, и определить его связь с социально-демографическими факторами и факторами, связанными с хирургическим вмешательством.

Материал и методы

Материал и методы. Проведено описательное поперечное исследование в течение 6 мес, с марта 2024 г. по август 2024 г., для оценки КЖ пациентов, перенесших кераторефракционную хирургию. Данные собраны с использованием стратегии неслучайной последовательной выборки с помощью валидированного и основанного на интервью инструмента анкетирования: «Влияние рефракционной коррекции на качество жизни» (QIRC). Данные проанализированы с помощью статистического пакета для социальных наук (SPSS) версии 26.

Результаты

Результаты. Установлено умеренное улучшение КЖ, при этом значимой связи между социально-демографическими факторами и КЖ пациентов после кераторефракционной хирургии не выявлено. В частности, такие переменные, как уровень образования (p = 0,09), род занятий (p = 0,70), возрастная группа (p = 0,30) и пол (p = 1,00), не показали статистически значимой связи. Кроме того, не обнаружено значимой связи между факторами, связанными с хирургическим вмешательством и КЖ, включая тип рефракционной хирургии (p = 0,107) и продолжительность послеоперационного периода (p = 0,512). 

Заключение

Заключение. Полученные данные указывают на умеренное улучшение КЖ лиц, перенесших кераторефракционные хирургические вмешательства. Большинство пациентов сообщили об улучшении КЖ после кераторефракционной хирургии.

Purpose

Purpose: to assess the quality of life (QoL) of patients who underwent keratorefractive surgery and to determine its association with sociodemographic and surgery related factors.

Material and methods

Material and methods. A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study was carried out over a period of six months from March 2024 to August 2024 to assess the QoL of patients who underwent keratorefractive surgery. Data was collected using non-probability consecutive sampling strategy using a validated and interview-based Questionnaire tool: Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC). Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26.

Results

Results. The results of this study indicated a moderate increase in QoL, while there was no significant association between sociodemographic factors and the QoL of patients following keratorefractive surgery. Specifically, variables such as level of education (p = 0.09), occupation (p = 0.70), age group (p = 0.30), and gender (p = 1.00) did not show a statistically significant relationship. Additionally, no significant association was observed between surgeryrelated factors and quality of life, including the type of refractive surgery (p = 0.107) and post-surgery duration (p = 0.512).

Conclusion

Conclusion. The findings indicate a moderate increase in the QoL among individuals who underwent keratorefractive surgical procedures. The majority of the patients reported an improvement in their QoL following keratorefractive surgery.

кераторефракционная хирургиякачество жизнилазерный кератомилез in situ (LASIK)фоторефракционная кератэктомия (PRK)трансэпителиальная фоторефракционная кератэктомия (Trans PRK)влияние коррекции рефракции на качество жизниkeratorefractive surgeryquality of lifelaser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (Trans PRK)quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC)ReferencesChang JY, Lin PY, Hsu CC, Liu CJ. Comparison of clinical outcomes of LASIK, Trans-PRK, and SMILE for correction of myopia. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2022 Feb 1; 85 (2): 145–51. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000674Chang JY, Lin PY, Hsu CC, Liu CJ. Comparison of clinical outcomes of LASIK, Trans-PRK, and SMILE for correction of myopia. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association. 2022 Feb 1; 85 (2): 145–51. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000674Meidani A, Tzavara C, Dimitrakaki C, Pesudovs K, Tountas Y. Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK improves quality of life. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28 (5): 319–30. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120403-01Meidani A, Tzavara C, Dimitrakaki C, Pesudovs K, Tountas Y. Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK improves quality of life. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28 (5): 319–30. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120403-01Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2012 Dec; 13: 1–5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1745-6215-13-75Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2012 Dec; 13: 1–5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1745-6215-13-75Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45 (7): 2341–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15223816/Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45 (7): 2341–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15223816/Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, McDonnell PJ, NEI-RQL Focus Group Investigators. Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups. Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec 1; 110 (12): 2285–91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642003011564Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, McDonnell PJ, NEI-RQL Focus Group Investigators. Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups. Ophthalmology. 2003 Dec 1; 110 (12): 2285–91. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642003011564Nichols JJ, Twa MD, Mitchell GL. Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31 (12): 2313–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16473223/Nichols JJ, Twa MD, Mitchell GL. Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31 (12): 2313–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16473223/Miller AE, McCulley JP, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Wang XH. Patient satisfaction after LASIK for myopia. CLAO J. 2001; 27 (2): 84–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11352454/Miller AE, McCulley JP, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Wang XH. Patient satisfaction after LASIK for myopia. CLAO J. 2001; 27 (2): 84–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11352454/Lesueur L, Munoz-Sastre MT, Mullet E, Dabadie B, Arn JL. Les pr dicteurs de qualit de vie en chirurgie r fractive [Predictors of quality of life in refractive surgery]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Sep; 26 (7): 699–709. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13130257/Lesueur L, Munoz-Sastre MT, Mullet E, Dabadie B, Arn JL. Les pr dicteurs de qualit de vie en chirurgie r fractive [Predictors of quality of life in refractive surgery]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 Sep; 26 (7): 699–709. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13130257/Katzen J. Management of anxiety in the refractive surgery patient. Insight. 2002; 27 (4): 103–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12520985/Katzen J. Management of anxiety in the refractive surgery patient. Insight. 2002; 27 (4): 103–7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12520985/Lazon de La Jara P, Erickson D, Erickson P, Stapleton F. Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK. Eye. 2011 Sep; 25 (9): 1194–201. https://www.nature.com/articles/eye2011151Lazon de La Jara P, Erickson D, Erickson P, Stapleton F. Visual and non-visual factors associated with patient satisfaction and quality of life in LASIK. Eye. 2011 Sep; 25 (9): 1194–201. https://www.nature.com/articles/eye2011151Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jul 1; 110 (7): 1371–8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016164200300455XBailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jul 1; 110 (7): 1371–8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016164200300455XKlokova OA, Sakhnov SN, Geydenrikh MS, Damashauskas RO. Quality of life after refractive surgery: ReLEx SMILE vs Femto-LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 13: 561–70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30988598/Klokova OA, Sakhnov SN, Geydenrikh MS, Damashauskas RO. Quality of life after refractive surgery: ReLEx SMILE vs Femto-LASIK. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 13: 561–70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30988598/Han T, Xu Y, Han X, et al. Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec; 18: 1–8. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-020-01362-8Han T, Xu Y, Han X, et al. Quality of life impact of refractive correction (QIRC) results three years after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec; 18: 1–8. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-020-01362-8Matsuguma S, Negishi K, Kawashima M, et al. Patients’ satisfaction and subjective happiness after refractive surgery for myopia. Patient preference and adherence. 2018 Sep; 25: 1901–6. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2147/PPA.S169902Matsuguma S, Negishi K, Kawashima M, et al. Patients’ satisfaction and subjective happiness after refractive surgery for myopia. Patient preference and adherence. 2018 Sep; 25: 1901–6. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2147/PPA.S169902Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin JF, et al, Canadian Refractive Surgery Research Group. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy: Part 2: survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology. 2000 Sep 1; 107 (9): 1790–6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642000002670Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin JF, et al, Canadian Refractive Surgery Research Group. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy: Part 2: survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology. 2000 Sep 1; 107 (9): 1790–6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642000002670

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.