<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">helmholtzeyeinstitute</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Российский офтальмологический журнал</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Russian Ophthalmological Journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2072-0076</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-5760</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Real time Publishers</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21516/2072-0076-2026-19-1-79-84</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">helmholtzeyeinstitute-2051</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КЛИНИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CLINICAL STUDIES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сравнительная характеристика методов гониоскопии и оптической когерентной томографии переднего отрезка глаза при визуализации иридо-трабекулярного контакта</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparative characteristics of gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography in visualizing the iridotrabecular contact</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-6671</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Курышева</surname><given-names>Н. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kurysheva</surname><given-names>N. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Наталия Ивановна Курышева — д-р мед. наук, профессор, заведующая кафедрой глазных болезней, Медико-биологический университет инноваций и непрерывного образования ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «Федеральный биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России; руководитель консультативно-диагностического отделения, Центр офтальмологии ФМБА России, ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «ФМБЦ им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России</p><p>ул. Живописная, д. 46, корп. 8, Москва, 123098, </p><p>ул. Гамалеи, д. 15, Москва, 123098</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Natalia  I.  Kurysheva — Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, head of the ophthalmology department, Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the A.I. Burnazyan Federal Biophysical Center; head of the consultative and diagnostic department, Ophthalmological Center of A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Federal Biophysical Center</p><p>8, Zhivopisnaya St., Moscow, 123098, </p><p>15, Gamalei St., Moscow, 123098</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7163-4858</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шарова</surname><given-names>Г. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sharova</surname><given-names>G. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Галина Аркадьевна Шарова — канд. мед. наук, ассистент кафедры глазных болезней, Медико-биологический университет инноваций и непрерывного образования ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «Федеральный биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России; заведующая диагностическим офтальмологическим отделением, ООО «Глазная клиника доктора Беликовой», пр-т Буденного</p><p>ул. Живописная, д. 46, корп. 8, Москва, 123098, </p><p>пр-т Буденного, д. 26, корп. 2, Москва, 105118</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Galina A.  Sharova  — Cand. of Med. Sci., assistant professor at the ophthalmology department, Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the A.I. Burnazyan Federal Biophysical Center; head of the diagnostic ophthalmology department, Ophthalmology Clinic of Dr. Belikova</p><p>8, Zhivopisnaya St., Moscow, 123098, </p><p>26/2, Budenny Ave, Moscow, 105118</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">galina.shar@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Медико-биологический университет инноваций и непрерывного образования ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «Федеральный биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России;&#13;
Центр офтальмологии ФМБА России, ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «ФМБЦ им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the A.I. Burnazyan Federal Biophysical Center;&#13;
Ophthalmological Center of A.I. Burnazyan Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Federal Biophysical Center</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Медико-биологический университет инноваций и непрерывного образования ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «Федеральный биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России;&#13;
ООО «Глазная клиника доктора Беликовой»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the A.I. Burnazyan Federal Biophysical Center;&#13;
Ophthalmology Clinic of Dr. Belikova</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>79</fpage><lpage>84</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/2051">https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/2051</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель работы — сравнить результаты визуализации иридо-трабекулярного контакта (ИТК) с помощью гониоскопии и оптической когерентной томографии переднего отрезка глаза (AS-OCT) у пациентов с заболеванием первичного закрытия угла (ЗПЗУ).</p><sec><title>Материал и методы</title><p>Материал и методы. Ретроспективно проанализированы данные 20 пациентов в возрасте от 49 до 82 лет с ПЗУ и 23 — с первичной закрытоугольной глаукомой начальной стадии. Всем участникам наряду с гониоскопией выполнена AS-OCT на CASIA2 (Tomey Corporation, Nayoga, Япония), включая оценку индекса (ITC Index) и площади ИТК (ITC Area).</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. По данным гониоскопии,   среднее   значение   количества   секторов   угла   передней   камеры   (УПК)   закрытого и узкого профиля (со степенью открытия от 0 до 2 по Шафферу) было достоверно выше, чем по данным AS-OCT: 3,56 ± 0,65 и 2,04 ± 0,81 соответственно, (p = 0,02). Степень открытия УПК по Шафферу достоверно различалась между верхним и нижним — 0,06 ± 0,25 и 1,30 ± 1,22 соответственно (p = 0,00), верхним и назальным — 0,06 ± 0,25 и 0,72 ± 1,00 соответственно (p = 0,01), темпоральным и нижним — 0,20 ± 0,51 и 1,30 ± 1,22 соответственно (p = 0,04) секторами. Достоверных различий между верхним и темпоральным, назальным и нижним, а также темпоральным и назальным секторами не выявлено (все p &gt; 0,05). По данным AS-OCT, параметры ИТК составили: ITC Index = 45,4 ± 21,8 %, ITC Area = 5,81 ± 3,90 мм2.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. При ЗПЗУ гониоскопическое закрытие УПК (отсутствие визуализации трабекулярной сети по меньшей мере на 180°) еще не означает наличия ИТК, которое выявляется по данным AS-OCT. Верхний сектор УПК наиболее уязвим в отношении закрытия угла у пациентов с данной патологией.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>Purpose: to compare iridotrabecular contact (ITC) imaging findings of gonioscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in patients with primary angle closure disease (PACD).</p></sec><sec><title>Material and methods</title><p>Material and methods. Retrospective analysis of the data from 20 patients with primary angle closure and 23 with early stage primary angle-closure glaucoma aged 49 to 82 years was performed. All participants along with gonioscopy underwent AS-OCT on CASIA2 (Tomey Corporation, Nayoga, Japan) including assessment of the ITC Index and ITC Area.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. According to gonioscopy, the average value of the number of sectors of the anterior chamber angle (ACA) of a closed and narrow profile (with a degree of opening from 0 to 2 according to Schaffer) was significantly higher than according to AS-OCT data (3.56 ± 0.65 and 2.04 ± 0.81 respectively, p = 0.02). The degree of opening of the ACA according to Shaffer differed significantly between the superior and inferior (0.06 ± 0.25 and 1.30 ± 1.22, respectively, p = 0.00), superior and nasal (0.06 ± 0.25 and 0.72 ± 1.00, respectively, p = 0.01), temporal and inferior (0.20 ± 0.51 and 1.30 ± 1.22, respectively, p = 0.04) sectors. No significant differences were found between the superior and temporal, nasal and inferior, as well as temporal and nasal sectors (all p &gt; 0.05). According to AS-OCT data, the ITC parameters were: ITC Index = 45.4 ± 21.8% and ITC Area = 5.81 ± 3.90 mm2. Conclusion. In PACD, gonioscopic closure of the ACA (absence of visualization of the trabecular meshwork at least 180°) does not mean the presence of an ITC, as detected by AS-OCT. The superior sector of the ACA is the most vulnerable to angle closure in patients with this pathology.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>иридо-трабекулярный контакт</kwd><kwd>первичная закрытоугольная глаукома</kwd><kwd>первичное закрытие угла</kwd><kwd>AS-OCT</kwd><kwd>CASIA2</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>iridotrabecular contact</kwd><kwd>primary angle closure glaucoma</kwd><kwd>primary angle closure</kwd><kwd>AS-OCT</kwd><kwd>CASIA2</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb; 86 (2): 238–42. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.238</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb; 86 (2): 238–42. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.2.238</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клинические рекомендации «Глаукома первичная закрытоугольная». Москва: Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. 2024.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Clinical guidelines for primary angle-closure glaucoma. Moscow: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. 2024 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А. Первичный закрытый угол передней камеры: прогрессирование от подозрения до глаукомы. Часть 1. Частота и скорость перехода подозрения на первичный закрытый угол в истинно закрытый угол и первичную закрытоугольную глаукому. Вестник офтальмологии. 2022; 138 (4): 101–7. doi: 10.17116/oftalma2022138041101</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A. Primary anterior chamber angle closure: progression from suspect to glaucoma. Part 1. Frequency and rate of transition from suspected primary angle closure to true angle closure and primary angle closure glaucoma. Vestnik oftalmologii. 2022; 138 (4): 101–7 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2022138041101</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thomas R, George R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Jacob A. Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87 (4): 450–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.4.450</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thomas R, George R, Parikh R, Muliyil J, Jacob A. Five year risk of progression of primary angle closure suspects to primary angle closure: a population based study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87 (4): 450–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.4.450</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alsbirk PH. Anatomical risk factors in primary angle-closure glaucoma. A ten year follow up survey based on limbal and axial anterior chamber depths in a high risk population. Int Ophthalmol. 1992; 16 (4–5): 265–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917973</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alsbirk PH. Anatomical risk factors in primary angle-closure glaucoma. A ten year follow up survey based on limbal and axial anterior chamber depths in a high risk population. Int Ophthalmol. 1992; 16 (4–5): 265–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917973</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А. Анатомо-топографические особенности переднего и заднего сегментов глаза при ранних стадиях заболевания первичного закрытия угла. Национальный журнал Глаукома. 2023; 22 (1): 42–53. doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-1-42-53</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A. Anatomical and topographical characteristics of the eye in the early stages of primary angle closure disease. National Journal glaucoma. 2023; 22 (1): 42–53 (In Russ.). doi: 10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-1-42-53</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chansangpetch S, Rojanapongpun P, Lin SC. Anterior segment imaging for angle closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 188: xvi-xxix. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.006</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chansangpetch S, Rojanapongpun P, Lin SC. Anterior segment imaging for angle closure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 188: xvi-xxix. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.006</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А. Роль оптической когерентной томографии в диагностике заболеваний закрытого угла передней камеры. Часть 1: Визуализация переднего сегмента глаза. Офтальмология. 2021; 18 (2): 208–15. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-208-215</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A. The role of optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of angle closed diseases of the anterior chamber. Part 1: Visualization of the anterior segment of the eye. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021; 18 (2): 208–15 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-208-215</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang X, Guo PY, Lin C, et al. Assessment of iris trabecular contact in eyes with gonioscopic angle-closure. Ophthalmology. 2023; 130 (1): 111–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.017</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang X, Guo PY, Lin C, et al. Assessment of iris trabecular contact in eyes with gonioscopic angle-closure. Ophthalmology. 2023; 130 (1): 111–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.017</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Esporcatte BL, Vessani RM, Melo LA Jr, et al. Diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography and nonspecialist gonioscopy to detect angle closure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2022; 16 (1): 53–8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1354</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Esporcatte BL, Vessani RM, Melo LA Jr, et al. Diagnostic performance of optical coherence tomography and nonspecialist gonioscopy to detect angle closure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2022; 16 (1): 53–8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1354</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurysheva NI, Rodionova OY, Pomerantsev AL, Sharova G.A. Personalized management of physiologic/ophthalmologic particularities for predictive approach and targeted prevention of primary angle closure glaucoma applied to persons at risk. In: Wang W. (ed.). All around suboptimal health. Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine. 2024; 18: 171–92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-46891-9_13</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI, Rodionova OY, Pomerantsev AL, Sharova G.A. Personalized management of physiologic/ophthalmologic particularities for predictive approach and targeted prevention of primary angle closure glaucoma applied to persons at risk. In: Wang W. (ed.). All around suboptimal health. Advances in Predictive, Preventive and Personalised Medicine. 2024; 18: 171–92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-46891-9_13</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dai Y, Zhang S, Shen M, et al. Modeling of gonioscopic anterior chamber angle grades based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Eye Vis (Lond). 2020; 7: 30. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00196-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dai Y, Zhang S, Shen M, et al. Modeling of gonioscopic anterior chamber angle grades based on anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Eye Vis (Lond). 2020; 7: 30. doi: 10.1186/s40662-020-00196-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guo PY, Zhang X, Li F, et al. Diagnostic criteria of anterior segment sweptsource optical coherence tomography to detect gonioscopic angle closure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024; 108: 1130–6. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323860</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guo PY, Zhang X, Li F, et al. Diagnostic criteria of anterior segment sweptsource optical coherence tomography to detect gonioscopic angle closure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2024; 108: 1130–6. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323860</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Young SL, Cheng KKW, O’ Connell N, Sanders R, Agarwal PK. PACS plus criteria: a retrospective cohort review of 612 consecutive patients treated with bilateral YAG peripheral iridotomies. Eye (Lond). 2023; 37 (18): 3834–8. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02626-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Young SL, Cheng KKW, O’ Connell N, Sanders R, Agarwal PK. PACS plus criteria: a retrospective cohort review of 612 consecutive patients treated with bilateral YAG peripheral iridotomies. Eye (Lond). 2023; 37 (18): 3834–8. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02626-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang F, Wu H. Treatment preferences and factors influencing the management of primary angle-closure suspect in China: A national survey study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13 (1): 11325. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00828-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang F, Wu H. Treatment preferences and factors influencing the management of primary angle-closure suspect in China: A national survey study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13 (1): 11325. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00828-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yuan Y, Wang W, Xiong R, et al. 14-year outcome of angle-closure prevention with laser iridotomy in the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Study: Extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2023; 130 (8): 786–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.03.024</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yuan Y, Wang W, Xiong R, et al. 14-year outcome of angle-closure prevention with laser iridotomy in the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Study: Extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2023; 130 (8): 786–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.03.024</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu B, Wang K, Zhang X, Xing X. Biometric indicators of anterior segment parameters before and after laser peripheral iridotomy by swept-source optical coherent tomography. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22 (1): 222. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02448-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu B, Wang K, Zhang X, Xing X. Biometric indicators of anterior segment parameters before and after laser peripheral iridotomy by swept-source optical coherent tomography. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22 (1): 222. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02448-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurysheva NI, Pomerantsev AL, Rodionova OY, Sharova GA. Comparison of lens extraction versus laser iridotomy on anterior segment, choroid, and intraocular pressure in primary angle closure using machine learning. J Glaucoma. 2023; 32 (6): e43-e55. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002145</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI, Pomerantsev AL, Rodionova OY, Sharova GA. Comparison of lens extraction versus laser iridotomy on anterior segment, choroid, and intraocular pressure in primary angle closure using machine learning. J Glaucoma. 2023; 32 (6): e43-e55. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002145</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bayraktar S, Yıldırım Erdal BD, Altaş FB, Türkay M, Şen E. The effects of lens extraction surgery on intraocular pressure and anterior segment parameters in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024; 54 (1): 32–7. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.82453</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bayraktar S, Yıldırım Erdal BD, Altaş FB, Türkay M, Şen E. The effects of lens extraction surgery on intraocular pressure and anterior segment parameters in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024; 54 (1): 32–7. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.82453</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111 (6): 831–6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111 (6): 831–6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090060119035</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xu BY, Pardeshi AA, Burkemper B, et al. Differences in anterior chamber angle assessments between gonioscopy, EyeCam, and anterior segment OCT: The Chinese American Eye Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019; 8 (2): 5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xu BY, Pardeshi AA, Burkemper B, et al. Differences in anterior chamber angle assessments between gonioscopy, EyeCam, and anterior segment OCT: The Chinese American Eye Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019; 8 (2): 5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tun TA, Baskaran M, Perera SA, et al. Sectoral variations of iridocorneal angle width and iris volume in Chinese singaporeans: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 252 (7): 1127–32. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2636-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tun TA, Baskaran M, Perera SA, et al. Sectoral variations of iridocorneal angle width and iris volume in Chinese singaporeans: a swept-source optical coherence tomography study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 252 (7): 1127–32. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2636-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Gonioscopy in adult Chinese: the Liwan Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47 (11): 4772–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0309</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">He M, Foster PJ, Ge J, et al. Gonioscopy in adult Chinese: the Liwan Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47 (11): 4772–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0309</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Razeghinejad MR, Myers JS. Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of primary angle-closure disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov-Dec; 63 (6): 754–68. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.05.001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Razeghinejad MR, Myers JS. Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of primary angle-closure disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov-Dec; 63 (6): 754–68. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2018.05.001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Архипова А.Н., Туркина К.И. Объективная оценка угла передней камеры в здоровых глазах с помощью оптической когерентной томографии. Офтальмологические ведомости. 2017; 10 (3): 18–21. doi: 10.17816/OV10318-21</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arkhipova A.N., Turkina K.I. Objective anterior chamber angle evaluation of healthy eyes with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology journal. 2017; 10 (3): 18–21 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17816/OV10318-21</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sakata LM, Lavanya R, Friedman DS, et al. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology. 2008 May; 115 (5): 769–774. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.030</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sakata LM, Lavanya R, Friedman DS, et al. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology. 2008 May; 115 (5): 769–774. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.06.030</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Varma DK, Simpson SM, Rai AS, Ahmed IIK. Undetected angle closure in patients with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug; 52 (4): 373–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.12.010</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Varma DK, Simpson SM, Rai AS, Ahmed IIK. Undetected angle closure in patients with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug; 52 (4): 373–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.12.010</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Varma DK, Kletke SN, Rai AS, Ahmed IIK. Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug; 52 (4): 366–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.01.008</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Varma DK, Kletke SN, Rai AS, Ahmed IIK. Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug; 52 (4): 366–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.01.008</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li F, Yang Y, Sun X, et al. Digital gonioscopy based on three-dimensional anterior-segment OCT: An International Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2022; 129 (1): 45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.018</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li F, Yang Y, Sun X, et al. Digital gonioscopy based on three-dimensional anterior-segment OCT: An International Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2022; 129 (1): 45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.018</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Померанцев А.Л., Родионова О.Е., Шарова Г.А. Применение методов искусственного интеллекта в диагностике и лечении заболевания первичного закрытия угла. Вестник офтальмологии. 2024; 140 (5): 130–6. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2024140051130</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Pomerantsev A.L., Rodionova O.E., Sharova G.A. Application of artificial intelligence methods in the diagnosis and treatment of primary angle closure disease. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2024; 140 (5): 130–6 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2024140051130</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang Y, Wu Y, Guo C, et al. Diagnostic performance of deep learning classifiers in measuring peripheral anterior synechia based on swept source Optical Coherence Tomography Images. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 8: 775711. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.775711</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang Y, Wu Y, Guo C, et al. Diagnostic performance of deep learning classifiers in measuring peripheral anterior synechia based on swept source Optical Coherence Tomography Images. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 8: 775711. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.775711</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hao J, Li F, Hao H, et al. Hybrid variation-aware network for angle-closure assessment in AS-OCT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022; 41 (2): 254–65. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3110602</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hao J, Li F, Hao H, et al. Hybrid variation-aware network for angle-closure assessment in AS-OCT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022; 41 (2): 254–65. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3110602</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shan J, Li Z, Ma P, et al. Deep learning classification of angle closure based on anterior segment OCT. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Jan-Feb; 7 (1): 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.06.011</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shan J, Li Z, Ma P, et al. Deep learning classification of angle closure based on anterior segment OCT. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Jan-Feb; 7 (1): 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2023.06.011</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
