helmholtzeyeinstituteРоссийский офтальмологический журналRussian Ophthalmological Journal2072-00762587-5760Real time Publishers10.21516/2072-0076-2021-14-1-89-95helmholtzeyeinstitute-589Research ArticleОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫREVIEWSПрепериметрическая глаукомаPreperimetric glaucomahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1148-5184БакунинаН. А.BakuninaN. A.

Наталья Александровна Бакунина — кандидат медицинских наук, врачофтальмолог.

Ленинский проспект, д. 8, Москва, 119049

Natalia A. Bakunina — Cand. of Med. Sci., ophthalmologist.

8, Leninsky prospeсt, Moscow, 119049

nata-oko@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-5743ОпенковаЕ. Ю.OpenkovaE. V.

Елена Юрьевна Опенкова — кандидат медицинских наук, врач-офтальмолог.

Ул. Горького, д. 28, Челябинск, 454071

Elena Yu. Openkova — Cand. of Med. Sci., ophthalmologist.

28, Gor'kogo St., Chelyabinsk, 454071

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-6591ШапошниковаИ. В.ShaposhnikovaI. V.

Ирина Вячеславовна Шапошникова — врач-офтальмолог.

Ул. Рукавишникова, д. 20, Кемерово, 650000

Irina V. Shaposhnikova — ophthalmologist.

20, Rukavishnikova St., Кеmerovo, 650000

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5847-2017ГабдрахмановЛ. М.GabdrakhmanovL. M.

Ленар Маратович Габдрахманов — кандидат медицинских наук, врач-офтальмолог ГБУЗ СОКОБ им. Т.И. Ерошевского.

Ул. Ново-Садовая, д. 158, Самара, 443068

Lenar M. Gabdrakhmanov — Cand. of Med. Sci., ophthalmologist.

158, Novo-Sadovaya St., Samara, 443068

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9606-0566КуроедовА. В.KuroyedovA. V.

Александр Владимирович Куроедов — доктор медицинских наук, начальник отделения ЦВКГ им. П.В. Мандрыка, профессор кафедры РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова.

Ул. Б. Оленья, д. 8а, Москва, 107014; ул. Островитянова, д. 1, Москва, 117997

Alexandr V. Kuroyedov — Dr. of Med. Sci., head of ophthalmology department1 Mandryka CCHl, professor N.I. Pirogov Russian NRMU.

8A, Bolshaya, Olen’ya St., 107014, Moscow; 1, Ostrovityanova St., 117997 Moscow

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6321-8109СелезневА. В.SeleznevА. V.

Алексей Владимирович Селезнев — кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры.

Пр. Шереметевский, д. 8, Иваново, 153012

Aleksei V. Seleznev — Cand. of Med. Sci., Assistant Professor.

8, Sheremetevsky Prospekt., 153012

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-2471ЗаргарянА. Е.ZargaryanH. Y.

Асмик Ерджаниковна Заргарян — кандидат медицинских наук, врач-офтальмолог.

Ул. Пролетарская, д. 7, Балашиха, 14398

Hasmik Y. Zargaryan — Cand. of Med. Sci., ophthalmologist.

7, Proletarskaya St.,143980, Balashikha

ГКБ № 1 им. Н.И. ПироговаРоссияN.I. Pirogov City clinical hospital N 1Russian FederationМАУЗ ОЗП ГКБ № 8РоссияMunicipal Autonomous health institution City Clinical Hospital N 8Russian FederationОЦ Хорошее зрение, ОООРоссияGood Vision CenterRussian FederationГБУЗ СОКОБ им. Т.И. ЕрошевскогоРоссияSamara T.I. Eroshevsky Regional Clinical Ophthalmological HospitalRussian FederationФКУ ЦВКГ им. П.В. Мандрыка; ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава РоссииРоссияMandryka Central Clinical Hospital; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical UniversityRussian FederationФГБОУ ВО ИвГМА Минздрава РФРоссияState Medical AcademyRussian FederationОфтальмологическая клиника Доктор ГлазовРоссияDoctor Glazov Ophthalmology ClinicRussian Federation2021200320211418995Copyright © Бакунина Н.А., Опенкова Е.Ю., Шапошникова И.В., Габдрахманов Л.М., Куроедов А.В., Селезнев А.В., Заргарян А.Е., 20212021Бакунина Н.А., Опенкова Е.Ю., Шапошникова И.В., Габдрахманов Л.М., Куроедов А.В., Селезнев А.В., Заргарян А.Е.Bakunina N.A., Openkova E.V., Shaposhnikova I.V., Gabdrakhmanov L.M., Kuroyedov A.V., Seleznev А.V., Zargaryan H.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://roj.igb.ru/jour/article/view/589

В последнее время в офтальмологической литературе встречается много информации, касающейся вопросов диагностики препериметрической глаукомы (ППГ), однако алгоритмы выявления первичной открытоугольной глаукомы (ПОУГ) на данном этапе болезни еще не разработаны и нет единого мнения о том, какие же параметры и методы рекомендуется использовать. В предлагаемом обзоре обобщены имеющиеся в литературе сведения о диагностике ППГ и выделены основные параметры, на которые следует обращать внимание при обследовании пациентов с ПОУГ на ранней допериметрической стадии.

Recently, much literature data is available on the issue of diagnosis of preperimetric glaucoma (PPG), but no recognized algorithms of detecting primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) at this stage have been developed, and there is no general opinion as to what parameters and techniques should be used. The review offers a generalization of the literature data on PPG diagnosing and specifies the main parameters that should be taken into account in testing POAG patients at the early preperimetric stage. As is known, the diagnosis of glaucoma is based on detectable changes in the optic nerve head and visual field, but the onset of the disease occurs long before the above changes. Currently, the approach shifts towards early OCT diagnosis of glaucoma. Cohort studies show that structural disorders are detected 5–12 years earlier than functional ones in 17–60 % patients with POAG.

препериметрическая глаукомаоптическая когерентная томографияпериметриякомплекс ганглиозных клеток сетчаткислой нервных волокон сетчаткивнутренний плексиформный слойpreperimetric glaucomaoptical coherence tomographyperimetryretinal ganglion cell complexretinal nerve fiber layerinternal plexiform layerReferencesChechenina N.G., Shaposhnikova I.V., Frolova E.A., Lemberg O.V. Main sources of glaucoma detection at out-patient admission. RMJ. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2008; 4: 119–20 (in Russian).Chechenina N.G., Shaposhnikova I.V., Frolova E.A., Lemberg O.V. Main sources of glaucoma detection at out-patient admission. RMJ. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2008; 4: 119–20 (in Russian).Fabrikantov O.L., Shutova S.V., Sukhorukova A.V. Comparative characteristics of the standard automated perimetry and contour perimetry methods in diagnosis the initial stage of glaucoma. Ophthalmokhirurgija. 2015; (4): 24–9 (in Russian).Fabrikantov O.L., Shutova S.V., Sukhorukova A.V. Comparative characteristics of the standard automated perimetry and contour perimetry methods in diagnosis the initial stage of glaucoma. Ophthalmokhirurgija. 2015; (4): 24–9 (in Russian).Aznabaev B.M., Mukhamadeev T.R., Dibaev T.I. Optical coherence tomography + angiography of the eye. Moscow: August Borg; 2015 (in Russian).Aznabaev B.M., Mukhamadeev T.R., Dibaev T.I. Optical coherence tomography + angiography of the eye. Moscow: August Borg; 2015 (in Russian).Kurysheva N.I., Parshunina O.A., Ardzhevnishvili T.D., et al. New technologies in primary open-angle glaucoma diagnostics. Glaucoma. 2015; 14 (2): 22–31(in Russian).Kurysheva N.I., Parshunina O.A., Ardzhevnishvili T.D., et al. New technologies in primary open-angle glaucoma diagnostics. Glaucoma. 2015; 14 (2): 22–31(in Russian).Harasymowycz P., Birt C., Gooi P., et al. Medical management of glaucoma in the 21st century from a Canadian perspective. J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016: 6509809. doi:10.1155/2016/6509809Harasymowycz P., Birt C., Gooi P., et al. Medical management of glaucoma in the 21st century from a Canadian perspective. J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 2016: 6509809. doi:10.1155/2016/6509809Daga F.B., Gracitelli C.P.B., Diniz-Filho A., et al. Is vision-related quality of life impaired in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019; 103 (7): 955–9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312357Daga F.B., Gracitelli C.P.B., Diniz-Filho A., et al. Is vision-related quality of life impaired in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019; 103 (7): 955–9. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312357Takagi S.T., Kita Y., Yagi F., Tomita G. Macular retinal ganglion cell complex damage in the apparently normal visual field of glaucomatous eyes with hemifield defects. Glaucoma. Jun-Jul 2012; 21 (5): 318–25. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820d7e9dTakagi S.T., Kita Y., Yagi F., Tomita G. Macular retinal ganglion cell complex damage in the apparently normal visual field of glaucomatous eyes with hemifield defects. Glaucoma. Jun-Jul 2012; 21 (5): 318–25. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31820d7e9dL’vov V.A., Machekhin V.A., Fabrikantov O.L. Comparative analysis of morphometric parameters of the optic disk in glaucomatous eyes with discs of average and large size. Saratovskiy nauchno-medicinsikij zhurnal. 2019; 15 (2): 510–4 (in Russian).L’vov V.A., Machekhin V.A., Fabrikantov O.L. Comparative analysis of morphometric parameters of the optic disk in glaucomatous eyes with discs of average and large size. Saratovskiy nauchno-medicinsikij zhurnal. 2019; 15 (2): 510–4 (in Russian).Чоплин Н.Т., Ланди Д.С. Глаукома. Иллюстрированное руководство. Москва: Логосфера; 2011. [Choplin N.T., Landy D.S. Atlas of Glaucoma. Moscow: Logosphera; 2011 (in Russian)].Choplin N.T., Landy D.S. Atlas of Glaucoma. Moscow: Logosphera; 2011 (in Russian).Nordmann J. Ph. OCT & Optic nerve. Paris: Laboratoire Théa and Carl Zeiss Meditec. France SAS: 2014.Nordmann J. Ph. OCT & Optic nerve. Paris: Laboratoire Théa and Carl Zeiss Meditec. France SAS: 2014.Sriram P., Klistorner A., Graham S., Grigg J., Arvind H. Optimizing the detection of preperimetric glaucoma by combining structural and functional tests. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015; 56: 7794–800. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16721Sriram P., Klistorner A., Graham S., Grigg J., Arvind H. Optimizing the detection of preperimetric glaucoma by combining structural and functional tests. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015; 56: 7794–800. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16721Liebmann J. M. Ophthalmology and glaucoma practice in the COVID-19 Era. Journal of Glaucoma. Published Ahead-of-Print. 2020; April 14. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001519Liebmann J. M. Ophthalmology and glaucoma practice in the COVID-19 Era. Journal of Glaucoma. Published Ahead-of-Print. 2020; April 14. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001519Moreno-Monta J., Garcıa-Nieva A., Osio I.A., et al. Evaluation of RETICs glaucoma diagnostic calculators in preperimetric glaucoma. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2018; 7 (6): 13. doi:10.1167/tvst.7.6.13Moreno-Monta J., Garcıa-Nieva A., Osio I.A., et al. Evaluation of RETICs glaucoma diagnostic calculators in preperimetric glaucoma. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2018; 7 (6): 13. doi:10.1167/tvst.7.6.13Begum V.U., Addepali U.K., Senthil S., et al. Optic nerve head parameters of high-definition optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomogram in perimetric and preperimetric glaucoma. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 64 (4): 277–84. doi:10.4103%2F0301-4738.182938Begum V.U., Addepali U.K., Senthil S., et al. Optic nerve head parameters of high-definition optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomogram in perimetric and preperimetric glaucoma. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 64 (4): 277–84. doi:10.4103%2F0301-4738.182938Kara-José A.C., Melo L.A.S. Jr., Esporcatte B.L.B., et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (7): e0181428. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181428Kara-José A.C., Melo L.A.S. Jr., Esporcatte B.L.B., et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: Diagnostic accuracy and correlations with cup-to-disc ratio, structural tests and standard automated perimetry. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (7): e0181428. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181428Miljkovic A., Babic N., Davidovic S., et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre thickness in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. BMC ophthalmology. 2019. doi:10.21203/rs.2.16429/v1Miljkovic A., Babic N., Davidovic S., et al. Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre thickness in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. BMC ophthalmology. 2019. doi:10.21203/rs.2.16429/v1Aydogan T.K., Akcay B.I.S., Kardes E., Ergin A.H. Evaluation of spectral domain optical coherence tomography parameters in ocular hypertension, preperimetric, and early glaucoma. Indian J. Оphthalmol. 2017: 65 (11): 1143–50. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_157_17Aydogan T.K., Akcay B.I.S., Kardes E., Ergin A.H. Evaluation of spectral domain optical coherence tomography parameters in ocular hypertension, preperimetric, and early glaucoma. Indian J. Оphthalmol. 2017: 65 (11): 1143–50. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_157_17Nakano N., Hangai M., Nakanishi H., et al. Macular ganglion cell imaging in preperimetric glaucoma with speckle noise-reduced spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmol. 2011; 118 (12): 2414–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.015Nakano N., Hangai M., Nakanishi H., et al. Macular ganglion cell imaging in preperimetric glaucoma with speckle noise-reduced spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmol. 2011; 118 (12): 2414–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.015Kurysheva N.I. Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Мoscow: Grinlayt; 2015 (In Russian).Kurysheva N.I. Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Мoscow: Grinlayt; 2015 (In Russian).Kaushik S., Kataria P., Jain V., et al. Evaluation of macular ganglion cell analysis compared to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2018; 66 (4): 511–6. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1039_17Kaushik S., Kataria P., Jain V., et al. Evaluation of macular ganglion cell analysis compared to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2018; 66 (4): 511–6. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1039_17Kim K.E., Park K.H., Jeoung J.W., et al. Severity-dependent association between ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness and macular mean sensitivity in open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014; 92: 650–6. doi: 10.1111/aos.12438Kim K.E., Park K.H., Jeoung J.W., et al. Severity-dependent association between ganglion cell inner plexiform layer thickness and macular mean sensitivity in open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014; 92: 650–6. doi: 10.1111/aos.12438Oddone F., Lucenteforte E., Michelessi M., et al. Macular versus retinal nerve fiber layer parameters for diagnosing manifest glaucoma: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 939–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.041Oddone F., Lucenteforte E., Michelessi M., et al. Macular versus retinal nerve fiber layer parameters for diagnosing manifest glaucoma: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 939–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.041Naghizadeh F., Garas A., Vargha P., Holló G. Detection of early glaucomatous progression with different parameters of the RTVue optical coherence tomograph. J. Glaucoma. 2014; 23: 195–8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31826a9707Naghizadeh F., Garas A., Vargha P., Holló G. Detection of early glaucomatous progression with different parameters of the RTVue optical coherence tomograph. J. Glaucoma. 2014; 23: 195–8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31826a9707Kita Y., Soutome N., Horie D., Kita R., Hollo G. Circum papillary ganglion cell complex thickness to diagnose glaucoma: a pilot study. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 65 (1): 41–7. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_437_16Kita Y., Soutome N., Horie D., Kita R., Hollo G. Circum papillary ganglion cell complex thickness to diagnose glaucoma: a pilot study. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 65 (1): 41–7. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_437_16Cennamo G., Montorio D., Velotti N., et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in preperimetric open angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2017; 255 (9): 1793–7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3709-7Cennamo G., Montorio D., Velotti N., et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography in preperimetric open angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2017; 255 (9): 1793–7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3709-7Kim M.J., Jeoung J.W., Park K.H., Choi Y.J., Kim D.M. Topographic profiles of retinal nerve fiber layer defects affect the diagnostic performance of macular scans in preperimetric glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014; 55: 2079–87. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13506Kim M.J., Jeoung J.W., Park K.H., Choi Y.J., Kim D.M. Topographic profiles of retinal nerve fiber layer defects affect the diagnostic performance of macular scans in preperimetric glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014; 55: 2079–87. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13506Sung M.-S., Yoon, J.-H., Park, S.-W. Diagnostic validity of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness deviation map algorithm using Cirrus HD-OCT in preperimetric and early glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2014; 23 (8): e144-e151. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000000028Sung M.-S., Yoon, J.-H., Park, S.-W. Diagnostic validity of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness deviation map algorithm using Cirrus HD-OCT in preperimetric and early glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2014; 23 (8): e144-e151. doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000000028Zhang X., Dastiridou A., Francis B.A., et al. Comparison of glaucoma progression detection by Optical Coherence Tomography and visual field. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 184: 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.09.020Zhang X., Dastiridou A., Francis B.A., et al. Comparison of glaucoma progression detection by Optical Coherence Tomography and visual field. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 184: 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.09.020Dubey S., Prasanth B., Chauhan L., Mukherjee S. Detection of ganglion cell loss in preperimetric glaucoma by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2017; 1: 42–8. doi:10.29328/journal.hceo.1001006Dubey S., Prasanth B., Chauhan L., Mukherjee S. Detection of ganglion cell loss in preperimetric glaucoma by Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2017; 1: 42–8. doi:10.29328/journal.hceo.1001006Angelov B., Petrova K. Diagnostic accuracy of the parameters from ganglion cell complex map, evaluated with SD-OCT in primary openangle glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2014; 11 (3): 28–32 (in Russian). doi:10.18008/1816-5095-2014-3-28-32Angelov B., Petrova K. Diagnostic accuracy of the parameters from ganglion cell complex map, evaluated with SD-OCT in primary openangle glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2014; 11 (3): 28–32 (in Russian). doi:10.18008/1816-5095-2014-3-28-32Ангелов Б., Петрова Н. Оптическая когерентная томография и ее роль в диагностике глазной гипертензии, препериметрической и периметрической глаукомы. Офтальмология.2015; 12 (1): 46–56. doi:10.18008/1816-5095-2015-1-46-56Angelov B., Petrova K. Optical coherence tomography and its role in the diagnosis of ocular hypertension, preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2015; 12 (1): 46–56 (in Russian). doi:10.18008/1816-5095-2015-1-46-56Kim E.K., Park H.L., Park C.K. Segmented inner plexiform layer thickness as a potential biomarker to evaluate open-angle glaucoma: Dendritic degeneration of retinal ganglion cell. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (8): e0182404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182404Kim E.K., Park H.L., Park C.K. Segmented inner plexiform layer thickness as a potential biomarker to evaluate open-angle glaucoma: Dendritic degeneration of retinal ganglion cell. PLoS One. 2017; 12 (8): e0182404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182404Moon H., Lee J.Y., Sung K.R., Lee J.E. Macular ganglion cell layer assessment to detect glaucomatous central visual field progression. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 30 (6): 451–8. doi:10.3341/kjo.2016.30.6.451Moon H., Lee J.Y., Sung K.R., Lee J.E. Macular ganglion cell layer assessment to detect glaucomatous central visual field progression. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 30 (6): 451–8. doi:10.3341/kjo.2016.30.6.451Rolle T., Dallorto L., Bonetti B. Retinal and macular ganglion cell count estimated with optical coherence tomography RTVue-100 as a candidate biomarker for glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016; 57 (13): 5772–9. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18882Rolle T., Dallorto L., Bonetti B. Retinal and macular ganglion cell count estimated with optical coherence tomography RTVue-100 as a candidate biomarker for glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016; 57 (13): 5772–9. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18882Hua R., Gangwani R., Guo L., et al. Detection of preperimetric glaucoma using Bruch membrane opening, neural canal and posterior pole asymmetry analysis of optical coherence tomography. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 21743. doi: 10.1038/srep21743Hua R., Gangwani R., Guo L., et al. Detection of preperimetric glaucoma using Bruch membrane opening, neural canal and posterior pole asymmetry analysis of optical coherence tomography. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 21743. doi: 10.1038/srep21743Курышева Н.И., Паршутина О.А. Оптическая когерентная томография в диагностике глаукомной оптиконейропатии. Часть 1. Национальный журнал Глаукома. 2016; 15 (1): 86–96.Kurysheva N.I., Parshutina O.A. Optical coherence tomography in glaucoma optic neuropathy diagnostics. Part 1. Glaucoma. 2016; 15 (1): 86–96 (in Russian).Gmeiner J.M., Schrems C.Y., Mardin C.Y., et al. Comparison of Bruchs membrane opening minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in early glaucoma assessment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016; 57: 575–84. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18906Gmeiner J.M., Schrems C.Y., Mardin C.Y., et al. Comparison of Bruchs membrane opening minimum rim width and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in early glaucoma assessment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016; 57: 575–84. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18906Akil H., Al-Sheikh M., Falavarjani K.G., et al. Choroidal thickness and structural glaucoma parameters in glaucomatous, preperimetric glaucomatous, and healthy eyes using swept-source OCT. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 27 (5): 548–54. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000926Akil H., Al-Sheikh M., Falavarjani K.G., et al. Choroidal thickness and structural glaucoma parameters in glaucomatous, preperimetric glaucomatous, and healthy eyes using swept-source OCT. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 27 (5): 548–54. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000926Omodaka K., Takahashi S., Matsumoto A., et al. Clinical factors associated with lamina cribrosa thickness in patients with glaucoma, as measured with swept source optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4): e0153707. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153707Omodaka K., Takahashi S., Matsumoto A., et al. Clinical factors associated with lamina cribrosa thickness in patients with glaucoma, as measured with swept source optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4): e0153707. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153707Lee W.J., Kim Y.K., Jeoung J.W., Park K.H. Can probability maps of SweptSource Optical Coherence Tomography predict visual field changes in preperimetric glaucoma? Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2017; 58 (14): 6257–64. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22697Lee W.J., Kim Y.K., Jeoung J.W., Park K.H. Can probability maps of SweptSource Optical Coherence Tomography predict visual field changes in preperimetric glaucoma? Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2017; 58 (14): 6257–64. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22697Sawada A., Manabe Y., Yamamoto T., Nagata C. Long-term clinical course of normotensive preperimetric glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 101 (12): 1649–53. doi: 10.1136/ bjophthalmol-2016-309401Sawada A., Manabe Y., Yamamoto T., Nagata C. Long-term clinical course of normotensive preperimetric glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 101 (12): 1649–53. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309401Asaoka R., Iwase A., Hirasawa K., et al. Identifying «preperimetric» glaucoma in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014; 55: 7814–20. doi:10.1167/ iovs.14-15120Asaoka R., Iwase A., Hirasawa K., et al. Identifying «preperimetric» glaucoma in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014; 55: 7814–20. doi:10.1167/ iovs.14-15120Benova M., Shumnalieva V., Zdravkov Y., Tanev I. Application of Rare bit perimetry in preperimetric glaucoma. Bulg. Rev. Ophthalmol. 2017; 61: 27–32. doi:10.14748/bro.v0i1.5232Benova M., Shumnalieva V., Zdravkov Y., Tanev I. Application of Rare bit perimetry in preperimetric glaucoma. Bulg. Rev. Ophthalmol. 2017; 61: 27–32. doi:10.14748/bro.v0i1.5232Jung K.I., Park H-Y.L., Park Y.R., Park C.K. Use fullness of 10-2 matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry for detecting central visual field defects in preperimetric glaucoma patients. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 14622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15329-1Jung K.I., Park H-Y.L., Park Y.R., Park C.K. Use fullness of 10-2 matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry for detecting central visual field defects in preperimetric glaucoma patients. Sci. Rep. 2017; 7: 14622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15329-1Jung K.I., Park C.K. Detection of functional change in preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 182: 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.007Jung K.I., Park C.K. Detection of functional change in preperimetric and perimetric glaucoma using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 182: 35–44. doi:10.1016/ j.ajo.2017.07.007Eura M., Matsumoto C., Hashimoto S., et al. Test conditions in macular visual field testing in glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2017; 26 (12): 1101–6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000782Eura M., Matsumoto C., Hashimoto S., et al. Test conditions in macular visual field testing in glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2017; 26 (12): 1101–6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000782Kim H.J., Song Y.J., Kim Y.K., et al. Development of visual field defect after first-detected optic disc hemorrhage in preperimetric open-angle glaucoma. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 61 (4): 307–13. doi:10.1007/s10384-017-0509-xKim H.J., Song Y.J., Kim Y.K., et al. Development of visual field defect after first-detected optic disc hemorrhage in preperimetric open-angle glaucoma. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 61 (4): 307–13. doi:10.1007/s10384-017-0509-xHwang J., Konduru R., Zhang X., et al. Relationship among visual field, blood flow, and neural structure measurements in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012; 53: 3020–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8552Hwang J., Konduru R., Zhang X., et al. Relationship among visual field, blood flow, and neural structure measurements in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012; 53: 3020–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8552Shiga Y., Kunikata H., Aizawa N., et al. Optic nerve head blood flow, as measured by laser specleflowgraphy, is significantly reduced in preperimetric glaucoma. Cur. Eye Res. 2016; 41 (11): 1447–53. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1127974Shiga Y., Kunikata H., Aizawa N., et al. Optic nerve head blood flow, as measured by laser specleflowgraphy, is significantly reduced in preperimetric glaucoma. Cur. Eye Res. 2016; 41 (11): 1447–53. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1127974Kumar R.S., Anegondi N., Chandapura R.S., et al. Discriminant function of optical coherence tomography angiography to determine disease severity in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016; 57 (14): 6079–88. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19984Kumar R.S., Anegondi N., Chandapura R.S., et al. Discriminant function of optical coherence tomography angiography to determine disease severity in glaucoma. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016; 57 (14): 6079–88. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19984Holló G. Progressive decrease of peripapillary angioflow vessel density during structural and visual field progression in early primary open-angle glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2017; 26 (7): 661–4. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000695Holló G. Progressive decrease of peripapillary angioflow vessel density during structural and visual field progression in early primary open-angle glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2017; 26 (7): 661–4. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000695Schrems W.A., Schrems-Hoesl L.M., Mardin C.Y., et al. Can glaucomatous visual field progression be predicted by structural and functional measures? J. Glaucoma. 2017; 26 (4): 373–82. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000628Schrems W.A., Schrems-Hoesl L.M., Mardin C.Y., et al. Can glaucomatous visual field progression be predicted by structural and functional measures? J. Glaucoma. 2017; 26 (4): 373–82. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000628Aizawa N., Kunikata H., Shiga Y., et al. Preperimetric Glaucoma Prospective Observational Study (PPGPS): design, baseline characteristics, and therapeutic effect of tafluprost in preperimetric glaucoma eye. PLoS ONE 12 (12): e0188692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188692Aizawa N., Kunikata H., Shiga Y., et al. Preperimetric Glaucoma Prospective Observational Study (PPGPS): design, baseline characteristics, and therapeutic effect of tafluprost in preperimetric glaucoma eye. PLoS ONE 12 (12): e0188692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188692Porciatti V., Ventura L.M. Retinal ganglion cell functional plasticity and optic neuropathy: a comprehensive model. J. Neuroophthalmol. 2012; 32 (4): 354–8. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3182745600Porciatti V., Ventura L.M. Retinal ganglion cell functional plasticity and optic neuropathy: a comprehensive model. J. Neuroophthalmol. 2012; 32 (4): 354–8. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3182745600Karaskiewicz J., Penkala K., Mularczyk M., Lubinski W. Evaluation of retinal ganglion cell function after intraocular pressure reduction measured by pattern electroretinogram in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Doc. Ophthalmol. 2017; 134 (2): 89–97. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9575-0Karaskiewicz J., Penkala K., Mularczyk M., Lubinski W. Evaluation of retinal ganglion cell function after intraocular pressure reduction measured by pattern electroretinogram in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Doc. Ophthalmol. 2017; 134 (2): 89–97. doi: 10.1007/s10633-017-9575-0Kreuz A.C., Moraes C.G., Hatanaka M., et al. Macular and multifocal PERG and FD-OCT in preperimetric and hemifield loss glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2018; 27 (2): 121–32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000857Kreuz A.C., Moraes C.G., Hatanaka M., et al. Macular and multifocal PERG and FD-OCT in preperimetric and hemifield loss glaucoma. J. Glaucoma. 2018; 27 (2): 121–32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000857

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.