A new method of amblyopia treatment in children with unstable central and eccentric fixation using biofeedback

   Purpose.  To develop a new method of amblyopia treatment in children with unstable central and eccentric fixation by centralizing visual fixation and increasing retinal photosensitivity in the macular region using biofeedback.

   Material and methods.  The study included 27 patients (27 eyes) with amblyopia of various origins, aged 5 to 17 (averagely 9.15 ± 3.19 years), who were able to perform training sessions on the MP-3 Nidek microperimeter (Japan). In addition to standard examination, all patients underwent binocular status assessment using a four-point test, macular electroretinography, microperimetry, optical coherence tomography (OCT). The treatment, carried out on the microperimeter using visual (flickering checkerboard pattern) and sound signal biofeedback, consisted of 10—15 sessions, 10—12 minutes each. All patients were examined before treatment cycle, immediately upon the end of the cycle, and also 1 and 3 months after it.  

   Results.  Preliminary results showed an increase in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from 0.41 ± 0.24 to 0.68 ± 0.27 (33.9 %), the photosensitivity of the retina in the fovea increased from 27.07 ± 3.90 to 29.8 ± 3.3 dB (10 %), fixation density in the central region from 59.80 ± 31.08 to 72.05 ± 34.5 %
(20.4 %) with its amplitude decreased by more than two times. After treatment, unstable central fixation changed to stable central fixation in all cases. With eccentric fixation, the fixation point shifted closer to the central region, and fixation characteristics improved in 75 % of cases. The obtained results retained throughout the observation period which lasted up to 3 months.

   Conclusion.  The proposed new treatment method of amblyopia with impaired fixation of various degrees proved to be effective and safe and can be recommended for use in pediatric patients.

1. Fu Z., Hong H., Su Z., et al. Global prevalence of amblyopia and disease burden projections through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug; 104 (8): 1164–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314759

2. Gonz lez E. G., Wong A. M., Niechwiej-Szwedo E., Tarita-Nistor L., Steinbach M. J. Eye position stability in amblyopia and in normal binocular vision. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012 Aug 9; 53 (9): 5386–94. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-9941

3. Fawcett S. L., Birch E. E. Risk factors for abnormal binocular vision after successful alignment of accommodative esotropia. J. AAPOS. 2003 Aug; 7 (4): 256–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-8531(03)00111-3

4. Кошелев Д. И. Зрительные вызванные потенциалы и движения глаза при фиксации как средства объективного мониторинга зрительных функций у детей с нарушением центрального зрения / Д. И. Кошелев // Практическая медицина. – 2019. – 17 (1): 127–33. [Koshelev D. I. Visual evoked potentials and eye movements during fixation as a means of objective monitoring of visual functions in children with central vision impairment. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2019; 2: 22–4 (in Russian)].

5. Vingolo E. M., Salvatore S., Cavarretta S. Low-vision rehabilitation by means of MP-1 biofeedback examination in patients with different macular diseases: a pilot study. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. 2009; 34 (2): 127–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-009-9083-4

6. Altpeter E., Mackeben M., Trauzettel-Klosinski S. The importance of sustained attention for patients with maculopathies. Vision Res. 2000; 40 (10–12): 1539–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00059-6

7. Scuderi G., Verboschi F., Domanico D., Spadea L. Fixation improvement through biofeedback rehabilitation in Stargardt Disease. Case Reports in Medicine. Vol. 2016: 4264829 (4) https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4264829

8. Vingolo E. M., Salvatore S., Domanico D., Spadea L., Nebbioso M. Visual rehabilitation in patients with myopic maculopathy: our experience. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2013; 48 (5): 438–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.08.004

9. Ueda-Consolvo T., Otsuka M., Hayashi Y., Ishida M., Hayashi A. Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity after successful macular hole surgery. J. Ophthalmol. 2015; 2015: 572942. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/572942

10. Verboschi F., Domanico D., Nebbioso M., et al. New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction. Funct. Neurol. 2013; 28 (4): 285–91. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24598397/

11. Vingolo E. M., Salvatore S., Limoli P. G. MP-1 biofeedback: luminous pattern stimulus versus acoustic biofeedback in age related macular degeneration (AMD). Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. 2013 Mar; 38 (1): 11–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-012-9203-4

12. Amore F. M., Paliotta S., Silvestri V., et al. Biofeedback stimulation in patients with age-related macular degeneration: comparison between 2 different methods. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct; 48 (5): 431–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.07.013

13. Daibert-Nido M., Pyatova Y., Markowitz M., Taheri-Shirazi M., Markowitz S. N. Post audio-visual biofeedback training visual functions and quality of life in paediatric idiopathic infantile nystagmus: A pilot study. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2021; 26: 1120672121991048 https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672121991048

14. Caputo R., Febbrini Del Magro E., Amoaku W. M., et al. The efficacy of biofeedback visual rehabilitation therapy in patients with infantile nystagmus syndrome: A retrospective study. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2020; 6: 1120672120940981. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120940981

15. Белостоцкий Е. М. Некоторые вопросы современного лечения содружественного косоглазия / Е. М. Белостоцкий // Вестник офтальмологии. – 1956. – 3: 30–2. [Belostotsky E. M. Some issues of modern treatment of concomitant strabismus. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1956; 3: 30–2 (in Russian)].

16. Fujii G. Y., de Juan E Jr., Sunness J., et al. Patient selection for macular translocation surgery using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109 (9): 1737–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01120-x

17. Аветисов Э. С. Дисбинокулярная амблиопия и ее лечение / Э.С. Аветисов. – Москва: Медицина, 1968. [Avetisov E. S. Dysbinocular amblyopia and its treatment. Moscow: Medicine; 1968 (in Russian)].

18. Тарутта Е. П. Способ формирования центральной зрительной фиксации и повышения светочувствительности сетчатки у детей с амблиопией с неустойчивой центральной и нецентральной фиксацией /Е. П. Тарутта [и др.] – Патент РФ на изобретение № 2741696 от 18. 05. 2020. [Tarutta E. P., Khubieva R. R., Apaev A. V., Milash S. V. Method for forming central visual fixation and increasing retinal light sensitivity in children with amblyopia with unstable central and non-central fixation. Patent RU 2741696, 18. 05. 2020 (in Russian)]. https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2741696C1_20210128

19. Кащенко М. А. Влияние плеоптического лечения на отклонение точки фиксации от центра макулярной зоны у детей с амблиопией различной степени при исследовании методом микропериметрии / М. А. Кащенко [и др.] // Российская детская офтальмология. – 2019. – 2: 22–4. [Kashchenko M. A., Kashchenko T. P., Magaramova M. D., Pedanova E. K., Golyakhovsky S. E. Influence of pleoptic treatment on the deviation of the fixation point from the center of the macular zone in children with amblyopia of varying degrees when studied by microperimetry. Rossiiskaya detskaya oftal'mologiya. 2019; 2: 22–4 (in Russian)]. https://doi.org/10.25276/2307-6658-2019-2-22-24

20. Shaikh A. G., Otero-Millan J., Kumar P., Ghasia F. F. Abnormal fixational eye movements in amblyopia. PLoS One 2016; 11 (3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149953

21. Chen D., Otero-Millan J., Kumar P., Shaikh A. G., Ghasia F. F. Visual search in amblyopia: abnormal fixational eye movements and suboptimal sampling strategies. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018; 59 (11): 4506–17. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24794

22. Sabel B. A., Henrich-Noack P., Fedorov A., Gall C. Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: the “residual vision activation theory”. Prog. Brain Res. 2011; 192: 199–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0

23. Jones P. R., Yasoubi N., Nardini M., Rubin G. S. Feasibility of macular integrity assessment (MAIA) microperimetry in children: sensitivity, reliability, and fixation stability in healthy observers. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016; 1; 57 (14): 6349–59. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20037

24. Daibert-Nido M., Pyatova Y., Markowitz M., Markowitz S. N. Visual outcomes of audio-luminous biofeedback training for a child with idiopathic nystagmus. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2021; 3: S0004-27492021005001213 https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20210026

25. Кащенко М. А. Способ формирования центральной зрительной фиксации у детей и взрослых с амблиопией с нецентральной фиксацией / М. А. Кащенко [и др.] – Патент РФ на изобретение № 2702158 от 13. 03. 2019. Бюлл. № 34. [Kashchenko M. A., Kashchenko T. P., Pedanova E. K., Magamarova M. D. Method for formation of central visual fixation in children and adults with amblyopia with non-central fixation. Patent RU 2702158, 13.03.2019. Byul. № 34. Accessed 30. 03. 2021 (in Russian)]. https://eyepress.ru/article.aspx?41147

26. Toto L., Di Antonio L., Mastropasqua A., De Nicola C., Mastropasqua L. Rehabilitation with MP1 biofeedback training of a posterior microphthalmos case. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2013; 48 (5): 107–e111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.02.006