Офтальмологические опасения при самопроизвольных родах
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-4-101-106
Аннотация
Самопроизвольные роды — естественный процесс. И все же некоторые патологические состояния могут привести к опасным последствиям для здоровья матери и ребенка даже в процессе физиологических родов. В таком случае имеются показания к оперативному родоразрешению, которое может сопровождаться рядом осложнений. В соответствии с клиническими рекомендациями РФ «Роды одноплодные, родоразрешение путем кесарева сечения» 2021 г. с офтальмологической стороны не существует абсолютных показаний к оперативному родоразрешению. Тем не менее некоторые специалисты настоятельно рекомендуют кесарево сечение при определенных состояниях органа зрения. Данный обзор посвящен оценке обоснованности опасений акушеров-гинекологов в отношении некоторых распространенных глазных заболеваний при самопроизвольных родах.
Об авторах
В. С. Акопян
Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова
Россия
Россия
Владимир Сергеевич Акопян — д-р мед. наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой офтальмологии.
Д. 1, Ленинские горы, Москва, 119991
Н. С. Семенова
Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова
Россия
Россия
Наталия Сергеевна Семенова — канд. мед. наук, доцент кафедры офтальмологии.
Д. 1, Ленинские горы, Москва, 119991
А. А. Кравченко
Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова
Россия
Россия
Анна Александровна Кравченко — аспирант кафедры офтальмологии.
Д. 1, Ленинские горы, Москва, 119991
Список литературы
1. Srivastav S, Jamil RT, Zeltser R. Valsalva Maneuver. 2022 Oct 25. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan.
2. Prabhakar H, Bithal PK, Suri A, Rath GP, Dash HH. Intracranial pressure changes during Valsalva manoeuvre in patients undergoing a neuroendoscopic procedure. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007 Apr; 50 (2): 98–101. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-982505
3. Amelard R, Robertson AD, Patterson CA, et al. Optical hemodynamic imaging of jugular venous dynamics during altered central venous pressure. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Aug; 68 (8): 2582–91. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3069133
4. Lewis SL. Aetiology of transient global amnesia. Lancet. 1998 Aug 1; 352 (9125): 397–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01442-1
5. Chung CP, Hsu HY, Chao AC, et al. Flow volume in the jugular vein and related hemodynamics in the branches of the jugular vein. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007 Apr; 33 (4): 500–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.10.009
6. Karska-Basta I, Tarasiewicz M, Kubicka-Trząska A, Miniewicz J, Romanowska-Dixon B. Cięcie cesarskie a zaburzenia związane z narządem wzroku [Cesarean section and eye disorders]. Ginekol Pol. 2016; 87 (3): 217–21 (in Polish). doi: 10.17772/gp/61752
7. Sapuła-Grabowska M, Ciszewska J, Brydak-Godowska J, et al. Delivery in myopic women: A comparison of mode of delivery in years 1990, 2000, and 2010. Med Sci Monit. 2019 Oct 14; 25: 7715–9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916479
8. Pilas-Pomykalska M, Czajkowskii J, Oszukowski P. Zmiany w narzadzie wzroku w przebiegu ciazy [Ocular changes during pregnancy]. Ginekol Pol. 2005 Aug; 76 (8): 655–60 (In Polish).
9. Simakurthy S, Tripathy K. Valsalva Retinopathy. 2021 Aug 21. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan.
10. Bitton K, Bacquet JL, Amoroso F, et al. Immediate post partum macular subretinal bleeding in a highly myopic patient: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 21; 21 (1): 54. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01814-9
11. Mehta Neesurg, Wen Angie. Myopia: A global epidemic. Retina Today, September 2019. Available at: www. retinatoday.com/articles/2019-sept/myopia-a-globalepidemic.
12. Гуляева Л.С., Винтерштейн М.В. Ведение беременности и родов у женщин с миопией. Медицинский журнал. 2018; 1: 67–9. https://medmag.bsmu.by/vypuski/2018-1/vedenie-beremennosti-i-rodov-u-zhenshchin-s-miopiey/
13. Socha MW, Piotrowiak I, Jagielska I, et al. Retrospektywna analiza patolog i narz du wzroku i czestości cieć cesarskich ze wskazan okulistycznych w latach 2000-2008 w materiale własnym [Retrospective analysis of ocular disorders and frequency of cesarean sections for ocular indications in 2000–2008-our own experience]. Ginekol Pol. 2010 Mar; 81 (3): 188–91 (In Polish).
14. Kuhn F, Aylward B. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a reappraisal of its pathophysiology and treatment. Ophthalmic Res. 2014; 51 (1): 15–31. doi: 10.1159/000355077
15. Blair K, Czyz CN. Retinal detachment. 2022 Jan 2. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan.
16. Клинические рекомендации. Роды одноплодные, родоразрешение путем кесарева сечения. 2021–2022–2023 (18.12.2023). Утверждены Минздравом РФ. https://praesens.ru/rubricator/klinicheskie-rekomendatsii/0b90f5bc-55de-491e-a3a6-dd51aa6a1e8d/
17. Moneta-Wielgos J, Brydak-Godowska J, Golebiewska J, Lipa M, Rekas M. The assessment of retina in pregnant women with myopia. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2018 Oct; 39 (4): 321–4. PMID: 30531707.
18. Moneta-Wielgos J, Lipa M, Brydak-Godowska J, Rekas M, Wielgos M. Ophthalmological and obstetric management in pregnant women with retinal disorders. Ginekol Pol. 2019; 90 (5): 285–8. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2019.0046
19. Ophthalmology-Obstetrics Consensus of Polish Society of Ophthalmology. 2014; 10: 06
20. Milazzo S, Mikou R, Berthout A, Bremond-Gignac D. Comprendre les troubles de la réfraction et les problèmes oculomoteurs pendant la grossesse [Understanding refraction disorders and oculomotor problems during pregnancy]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2010 May; 33 (5): 368–71 (In French). doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.03.001
21. Sackey J, Blazey-Vartin D. The preconception office visit. In: Wilins-Haug L. (Ed.). UpToDate. 2020. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/the-preconception-office-visit
22. Lockwood C, Magriples U. Prenatal care: Second and third trimesters. In: Berghella V. (Ed.), UpToDate. 2020. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/prenatal-care-second-and-third-trimesters
23. Evidence-based eye care. Kertes PJ, Johnson TM., eds. Second edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-1-4511-7638-432.
24. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group; Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30; 329 (14): 977–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401
25. Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Kranias G, et al. Progression of diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy: association with hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Apr; 166 (4): 1214–8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90608-5
26. Lauszus FF, Klebe JG, Bek T, Flyvbjerg A. Increased serum IGF-I during pregnancy is associated with progression of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes. 2003 Mar; 52 (3): 852–6. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.3.852
27. Klein BE, Moss SE, Klein R. Effect of pregnancy on progression of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1990 Jan; 13 (1): 34–40. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.1.34
28. Amoaku WM, Ghanchi F, Bailey C, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema pathways and management: UK Consensus Working Group. Eye (Lond). 2020 Jun; 34 (Suppl 1): 1–51. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-0961-6
29. Chew EY, Mills JL, Metzger BE, et al. Metabolic control and progression of retinopathy. The Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Diabetes in Early Pregnancy Study. Diabetes Care. 1995 May; 18 (5): 631–7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.5.631
30. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of pregnancy on microvascular complications in the diabetes control and complications trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Diabetes Care. 2000 Aug; 23 (8): 1084–91. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.8.1084
31. Mallika P, Tan A, S A, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and the effect of pregnancy. Malays Fam Physician. 2010 Apr 30; 5 (1): 2–5. PMID: 25606177.
32. Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020 Dec 16. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555331/
33. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and Its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2015 Feb. PMID: 25950069.
34. Feghali M, Khoury JC, Shveiky D, Miodovnik M. Association of vaginal delivery efforts with retinal disease in women with type I diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jan; 25 (1): 27–31. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.626924
35. Kapetanakis VV, Chan MP, Foster PJ, et al. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan; 100 (1): 86–93. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223
36. Schuster AK, Wagner FM, Pfeiffer N, Hoffmann EM. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma and recommendations for glaucoma screening. Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jul; 118(Suppl 2): 145–52. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01378-5
37. Dietl A, Cupisti S, Beckmann MW, Schwab M, Zollner U. Pregnancy and obstetrical outcomes in women over 40 years of age. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 Aug; 75 (8): 827–32. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546109
38. Cohen W. Does maternal age affect pregnancy outcome? BJOG. 2014 Feb; 121 (3): 252–4. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12563
39. Marx-Gross S, Laubert-Reh D, Schneider A, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in young people. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Mar 24; 114 (12): 204–10. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0204
40. Yoshida M, Okada E, Mizuki N, et al. Age-specific prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and its relationship to refraction among more than 60,000 asymptomatic Japanese subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Nov; 54 (11): 1151–8. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00388-2
41. Tolunay HE, Özcan SC, Şükür YE, et al. Changes of intraocular pressure in different trimesters of pregnancy among Syrian refugees in Turkey: A cross-sectional study. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun; 13 (2): 67–70. doi: 10.4274/tjod.40221
42. Qureshi IA. Intraocular pressure and pregnancy: a comparison between normal and ocular hypertensive subjects. Arch Med Res. 1997 Autumn; 28 (3): 397–400. PMID: 9291638.
43. Paterson GD, Miller SJ. Hormonal influence in simple glaucoma. A preliminary report. Br J Opthalmol. 1963 Mar; 47 (3): 129–37. doi: 10.1136/bjo.47.3.129
44. Brauner SC, Chen TC, Hutchinson BT, et al. The course of glaucoma during pregnancy: a retrospective case series. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug; 124 (8): 1089–94. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.8.1089
45. Danishevski K, McKee M, Sassi F, Maltcev V. The decision to perform Caesarean section in Russia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Apr; 20 (2): 88–94. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm070
46. Papamichael E, Aylward GW, Regan L. Obstetric opinions regarding the method of delivery in women that have had surgery for retinal detachment. JRSM Short Rep. 2011 Mar 31; 2 (4): 24. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.010107
47. Meshi A, Armarnik S, Mimouni M, et al. The effect of labor on the intraocular pressure in healthy women. J Glaucoma. 2017 Jan; 26 (1): 59–64. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000559
48. Strelow B, Fleischman D. Glaucoma in pregnancy: an update. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar; 31 (2): 114–22. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000641
49. Flach AJ. The importance of eyelid closure and nasolacrimal occlusion following the ocular instillation of topical glaucoma medications, and the need for the universal inclusion of one of these techniques in all patient treatments and clinical studies. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2008; 106: 138–45; discussion 145–8.
50. Belkin A, Chen T, DeOliveria AR, et al. American Glaucoma Society and the Canadian Glaucoma Society. A practical guide to the pregnant and breastfeeding patient with glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2020 Mar-Apr; 3 (2): 79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.12.004
51. Клинические рекомендации «Глаукома первичная открытоугольная». 2020–2021–2022 (18.12.2023). Утверждены Минздравом РФ. http://avo-portal.ru/documents/fkr/Klinicheskie_rekomendacii_POUG_2022.pdf
52. Bilgihan K, Hondur A, Sul S, Ozturk S. Pregnancy-induced progression of keratoconus. Cornea. 2011 Sep; 30 (9): 991–4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182068adc
53. Sunness JS. The pregnant woman's eye. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988 Jan-Feb; 32 (4): 219–38. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(88)90172-5
54. Suzuki T, Sullivan DA. Estrogen stimulation of proinflammatory cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase gene expression in human corneal epithelial cells. Cornea. 2005 Nov; 24 (8): 1004–9. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000160973.04072.a5
55. Bujor IA, Iancu RC, Istrate SL, Ungureanu E, Iancu G. Corneal biomechanical changes in third trimester of pregnancy. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jun 10; 57 (6): 600. doi: 10.3390/medicina57060600
56. Oh JY, Kim MK, Park JS, Wee WR. Spontaneous corneal melting during pregnancy: a case report. Cases J. 2009 May 26; 2: 7444. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-2-7444
57. Kanellopoulos AJ, Vingopoulos F. Does pregnancy affect refractive and corneal stability or corneal epithelial remodeling after myopic LASIK? J Refract Surg. 2020 Feb 1; 36 (2): 118–22. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200115-01
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Акопян В.С., Семенова Н.С., Кравченко А.А. Офтальмологические опасения при самопроизвольных родах. Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2024;17(4):101-106. https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-4-101-106
For citation:
Akopyan V.S., Semenova N.S., Kravchenko A.A. Ophthalmological concerns in spontaneous delivery. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2024;17(4):101-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-4-101-106
Просмотров:
327
Послать статью по эл. почте 