The significance of reactivation of latent herpes simplex viruses type 1 and 2 in the etiopathogenesis of chronic inflammatory eye diseases and the development of late post-uveal complications
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-4-129-134
Abstract
Herpes simplex viruses type 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2) cause widespread lifelong infections. These characteristics of herpes simplex virus infections (HSVI) are associated with the presence of two phases in the infectious cycle: the lytic infection phase, which involves the formation of new viral particles, and the latent infection phase, during which the HSV remains in cells in a hidden form that is less accessible to the immune system. The lytic and latent phases of HSVI differ in the form of the viral genome, its localization, number of active viral genes, and expressed viral products. Lytic infection primarily occurs in epithelial cells, while the reservoir of latent virus is the nuclei of sensory neurons of the ganglia innervating the site of lytic infection. “Abortive” infection of Hela transfected cells is considered as experimental analogue of latent neuron infection, in which HSV-1 genomes were detected in the nuclei of surviving cells for up to 5 weeks, retaining the ability to reactivate and induce lytic infection. Frequent subclinical reactivation of HSV with the release of infectious virus has been identified in individuals who have had herpes infections and in healthy people with chronic HSVI. Relapses of herpes disease occur much less frequently. Intercurrent diseases are one of the leading factors in the reactivation of latent HSV. Reactivation of HSV can trigger the exacerbation or development of non-herpetic diseases, complicating their course. Inclusion of specific antiviral agents in the complex therapy of such patients shortened the time till remission onset. HSV reactivation is a prognostically unfavorable factor not only in active eye disease but also in clinical remission. According to our data, subclinical HSV reactivation in patients with remission of uveitis increased the systemic production of pro-inflammatory and angiogenic chemokines, thus contributing to the chronicization of a low-grade inflammatory process and the development of late post-uveal complications. The question of prescribing specific antiviral therapy to such patients remains relevant.
Keywords
About the Authors
G. I. KrichevskayaRussian Federation
Galina I. Krichevskaya — Cand. of Med. Sci., leading researcher, department of immunology and virology.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
E. S. Sorozhkina
Russian Federation
Ekaterina S. Sorozhkina — Cand. of Med. Sci., Senior researcher, department of immunology and virology.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
N. V. Balatskaya
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Balatskaya — Cand. of Biol. Sci., head of the department of immunology and virology.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
L. A. Kovaleva
Russian Federation
Ludmila A. Kovaleva — Cand. of Med. Sci., researcher, department of infectious and allergic eye diseases.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
G. A. Davydova
Russian Federation
Galina A. Davydova — Cand. of Med. Sci., researcher, department of retina and optic nerve pathology.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
References
1. Kukhanova M.K., Korovina A.N., Kochetkov S.N. Human herpes simplex virus: Life cycle and development of inhibitors. Biochemistry Moscow. 2014; 79, 1635–52 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297914130124
2. Verzosa AL, McGeever LA, Bhark SJ, et al. Herpes Simplex Virus 1 infection of neuronal and non-neuronal cells elicits specific innate immune responses and immune evasion mechanisms. Front Immunol. 2021; 12: 644664. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.644664
3. Zhu S, Viejo-Borbolla A. Pathogenesis and virulence of herpes simplex virus. Virulence. 2021; 12 (1): 2670–702. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1982373
4. Bloom DC, Giordani N, Kwiatkowski DL. Epigenetic regulation of latent HSV-1 gene expression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010; 1799 (3–4): 246–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.12.001
5. Wilson AC, Mohr I. A cultured affair: HSV latency and reactivation in neurons. Trends Microbiol. 2012; 20 (12): 604–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.08.005
6. van Velzen M, Jing L, Osterhaus AD, et al. Local CD4 and CD8 T-cell reactivity to HSV-1 antigens documents broad viral protein expression and immune competence in latently infected human trigeminal ganglia. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9 (8):e1003547. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003547
7. Grinde B. Herpesviruses: latency and reactivation — viral strategies and host response. J Oral Microbiol. 2013; 5. doi: 10.3402/jom.v5i0.22766
8. Al-Dujaili LJ, Clerkin PP, Clement C, et al. Ocular herpes simplex virus: how are latency, reactivation, recurrent disease and therapy interrelated? Future Microbiol. 2011; 6 (8): 877–907. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.73V
9. Cohen EM, Avital N, Shamay M, Kobiler O. Abortive herpes simplex virus infection of nonneuronal cells results in quiescent viral genomes that can reactivate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117 (1): 635–40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910537117
10. van Gelderen BE, Van der Lelij A, Treffers WF, van der Gaag R. Detection of herpes simplex virus type 1, 2 and varicella zoster virus DNA in recipient corneal buttons. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84 (11): 1238–43. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.11.1238
11. Shimomura Y, Deai T, Fukuda M, et al. Corneal buttons obtained from patients with HSK harbor high copy numbers of the HSV genome. Cornea. 2007; 26 (2): 190–3. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802eaee6
12. Higaki S, Fukuda M, Shimomura Y. Virological and molecular biological evidence supporting herpes simplex virus type 1 corneal latency. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2015; 59 (2): 131–4. doi: 10.1007/s10384-014-0369-6
13. Singh N, Tscharke DC. Herpes Simplex Virus latency is noisier the closer we look. J Virol. 2020; 94 (4):e01701-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01701-19
14. Krichevskaia G.I., Andzhelov V.O., Katargina L.A., et al. Reactivation of persistent herpes virus infection as a factor of endogenous uveitis in children. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2005; 121 (2): 22–4 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2005
15. Neroev V.V., Tankovsky V.E. Uveitis. (Main symptoms and treatment). Moscow: Triumph; 2018 (In Russ.).
16. Kasikhina E.I., Glazko I.I., Chekmarev A.S. Herpetic infection: mechanisms of latency and reactivation. Potential to control the infection. Klinicheskaya Dermatologiya i Venerologiya. 2014; 12 (1): 75–80 (In Russ.).
17. Sidorova T.V., Lebedev V.V., Krichevskaia G.I., Katargina L.A., Bykovskaya G.N. Features of the pathogenesis of endogenous uveitis in children with chronic herpesvirus infection. Epidemiologia i vakcinoprofilaktika. 2003; 5 (12): 52–5 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2003-12-5
18. Perng GC, Osorio N, Jiang X, et al. Large amounts of reactivated virus in tears precedes recurrent herpes stromal keratitis in stressed rabbits latently infected with Herpes Simplex Virus. Curr Eye Res. 2016; 41 (3): 284–91. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1020172
19. Schiffer JT, Abu-Raddad L, Mark KE, et al. Frequent release of low amounts of herpes simplex virus from neurons: results of a mathematical model. Sci Transl Med. 2009; 1 (7): 7ra16. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000193
20. Kaufman HE, Azcuy AM, Varnell ED, et al. HSV-1 DNA in tears and saliva of normal adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jan; 46 (1): 241–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0614
21. Amin I, Younas S, Afzal S, Shahid M, Idrees M. Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and host antiviral immune responses: An Update. Viral Immunol. 2019 Dec; 32 (10): 424–9. doi: 10.1089/vim.2019.0097
22. Divito S, Cherpes TL, Hendricks RL. A triple entente: virus, neurons, and CD8+ T cells maintain HSV-1 latency. Immunol Res. 2006; 36 (1–3): 119–26. doi: 10.1385/IR:36:1:119
23. Hoshino Y, Pesnicak L, Cohen JI, Straus SE. Rates of reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus from mouse trigeminal ganglia ex vivo correlate directly with viral load and inversely with number of infiltrating CD8+ T cells. J Virol. 2007 Aug; 81 (15): 8157–64. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00474-07
24. Neroev V.V., Sorozhkina E.S., Krichevskaya G.I., et al. Clinical features of Behcet’s uveitis in patients with herpesvirus reactivation. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2022; 15 (4): 58–65 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-4-58-65
25. Krichevskaya G.I., Sorozhkina E.S., Balatskaya N.V., et al. Effect of Human Herpes Simplex Virus reactivation on systemic cytokine production in patients with Behcet’s diseases and uveitis. Medical immunology. 2021; 23 (4): 767–74 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-EOH-2286
26. Shimomura Y. Herpes simplex virus latency, reactivation, and a new antiviral therapy for herpetic keratitis. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2008 Mar; 112 (3): 247–64; discussion 265. Japanese. PMID: 18411713.
27. Valerio GS, Lin CC. Ocular manifestations of herpes simplex virus. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov; 30 (6): 525–31. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000618
28. Kovaleva L.A., Davydova G.A., Krichevskaya G.I., et al. Method for determining indication for antiviral therapy for anterior noninfectious uveitis associated with immune-inflammatory rheumatoid diseases. Patent RF, N 2780543; 2022 (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Krichevskaya G.I., Sorozhkina E.S., Balatskaya N.V., Kovaleva L.A., Davydova G.A. The significance of reactivation of latent herpes simplex viruses type 1 and 2 in the etiopathogenesis of chronic inflammatory eye diseases and the development of late post-uveal complications. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2024;17(4):129-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-4-129-134