Role of densitometry and combination therapy in ultrasound-free femtosecond laser lens surgery in patients with refractive disorders
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2025-18-2-28-33
Abstract
Purpose the study — to evaluate the effectiveness of a personalized approach to femtosecond laser fragmentation of the lens nucleus based on densitometry, as well as to analyze the effect of a combination drug (ketorolac + levofloxacin) on perioperative patient management. Material and methods. The study included 64 patients (64 eyes) aged 52 ± 10 with ametropia of various degrees and types, as well as with cataracts of I–III degrees of lens nucleus density according to the PNS and Buratto classification. Preoperative densitometry was performed on Pentacam and Galilei G6. The data were used for personalized selection of femtosecond laser energy and nuclear fragmentation pattern. Patients of group 1 (n = 33) received a combination drug (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and antibiotic), in group 2 (n = 31) — NSAID and antibiotic separately. Results. Personalized femtolaser parameters provided effective fragmentation of the nucleus in all cases. Combined therapy showed advantages over separate therapy in terms of mydriasis stability, inflammation prevention, and treatment adherence. Conclusion. The study confirms the importance of densitometric assessment of lens density and combined drug therapy to improve the efficacy and safety of femtolaser-assisted refractive lens surgery.
About the Authors
D. E. ArakelyanRussian Federation
David E. Arakelyan — PhD student, ophthalmologist, department of lens surgery and intraocular correction.
59a, Beskudnikovskii Blvd. Moscow, 127486
S. Yu. Kopaev
Russian Federation
Sergei Yu. Kopaev — Dr. of Med. Sci., senior researcher, department of lens surgery and intraocular correction, S.N. Fedorov NMRC MNTK “Eye Microsurgery”; professor, chair of eye diseases, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry.
59a, Beskudnikovskii Blvd. Moscow, 127486; 9a, Vucheticha St., Moscow, 127473
M. M. Kacharava
Russian Federation
Marina M. Kacharava — PhD student, ophthalmologist, department of lens surgery and intraocular correction.
9a, Vucheticha St., Moscow, 127473
References
1. Aznabaev B.M., Dibaev T.I., Munasypova V.V., Hamidov U.B., Muhamadeeva O.R. Densitometry of the lens during ultrasound phacoemulsification of cataract. Saratov Sci Med J. 2018; 14 (4): 815–7 (In Russ.).
2. Egorov A.E., Movsisyan A.B., Glazko N.G. Modern cataract surgery: nuances and solutions. Klinicheskaya oftalmologiya. 2020; 20 (3): 142–7 (In Russ.). doi: 10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-3-142-147
3. Reddy KP, Kandulla J, Auffarth GU. Effectiveness and safety of femtosecond laser–assisted lens fragmentation and anterior capsulotomy versus manual technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39 (9): 1297–306. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.035
4. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Mattei PA, et al. OCT-guided femtosecond laser capsulotomy versus manual capsulorhexis: effect on IOL centration and axial position. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40 (12): 2035–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.032
5. Assaf AH, Aziz BF. Comparison of ultrasound energy across cataract densities in femtoaspiration. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14: 2829–35. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S257813
6. Aly MG, Zaki RG, Shaaban YM, et al. FLACS in soft vs. hard cataracts: effect on phaco time. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021; 15: 1095–100. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S300145
7. Chee SP, Wong MHY, Yang Y. Randomized controlled trial comparing femtosecond laser-assisted with conventional phacoemulsification on dense cataracts. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021; 229: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.12.024
8. Lin HY, Kao ST, Chuang YJ, et al. Comparison of two laser patterns in FLACS. Lasers Med Sci. 2022; 37 (2): 843–8. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03321-1
9. Lim DH, Kim TH, Chung ES, Chung TY. Measurement of lens density using Scheimpflug imaging system as a screening test in the field of health examination for age-related cataract. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99 (2): 184–91. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305632
10. Al-Khateeb G, Shajari M, Vunnava K, et al. Impact of lens densitometry on ultrasound energy in FLACS. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017; 52 (4): 331–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.01.004
11. Wielders LHP, Schouten JSAG, Winkens B, et al. Prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery in nondiabetic and diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 160 (5): 968–81.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.032
12. ESCRS Endophthalmitis Study Group. Prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: results of the ESCRS multicenter study and identification of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33 (6): 978–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.02.032
13. Solomon KD, Sandoval HP, Potvin R. Comparing combination drop therapy to a standard drop regimen after routine cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14: 1959–65. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S260926
14. Cunha PAF, Shinzato FA, Tecchio GT, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of a gatifloxacin/prednisolone fixed combination for prophylaxis and inflammation control after phacoemulsification. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013; 68 (6): 834–9. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(06)18
Review
For citations:
Arakelyan D.E., Kopaev S.Yu., Kacharava M.M. Role of densitometry and combination therapy in ultrasound-free femtosecond laser lens surgery in patients with refractive disorders. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2025;18(2):28-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2025-18-2-28-33