Influence of fractal photostimulation on electroretinogram in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2025-18-2-80-89
Abstract
In visual rehabilitation, the search for methods based on the activation of neuroplasticity is relevant, which includes the technology of fractal photostimulation (FP). Previously, a positive effect of FP courses on the function and structure of the retina was demonstrated on animals with a model of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy. On the other hand, the advantages of virtual reality (VR) technologies for visual training in a game format that increases patient compliance are known. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of a FP course in VR on objective electroretinography parameters in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Material and methods. In 20 patients with dry AMD, intermediate and late stages, an ERG complex was recorded according to ISCEV standards before and in dynamics after a 2-week FP course. Results. A positive effect of FP on the activity of photoreceptors, as well as (to a slightly lesser extent) bipolar cells of the scotopic and photopic systems with a greater response to phototherapy of cone-related neurons were shown. The activating effect of FP on the outer retina was greatest in the early stages after the course of visual training. The positive effect of FP on the activity of retinal ganglion cells increased after the completion of the course for at least 1 month. The dynamics of multifocal ERG indicates a generalized activating effect of FP on the macula. Conclusion. The results of the study substantiate the prospects of fractal phototherapy as a method of visual rehabilitation that improves the functionality of the retinal neural network. It can also serve as a factor slowing down the progression of the degenerative process in the outer and inner retina.
About the Authors
N. V. NeroevaRussian Federation
Natalia V. Neroeva — Cand. of Med. Sci., head of the department of pathology of the retina and optic nerve.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
M. V. Zueva
Russian Federation
Marina V. Zueva — Dr. of Biol. Sci., professor, head of the department of clinical physiology of vision named after S.V. Kravkov.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
V. I. Kotelin
Russian Federation
Vladislav I. Kotelin — Cand. of Med. Sci., senior researcher, department of clinical physiology of vision named after S.V. Kravkov.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
I. V. Tsapenko
Russian Federation
Irina V. Tsapenko — Cand. of Biol. Sci., chief specialist of the department of clinical physiology of vision named after S.V. Kravkov.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
L. A. Katargina
Russian Federation
Ludmila A. Katargina — Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, head of the department of eye pathology in children, deputy director for science.
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
Yu. S. Timofeev
Russian Federation
Yury S. Timofeev — head of the laboratory for the study of biochemical risk markers of chronic non-communicable disease, department of fundamental and applied aspects of obesity.
10, Petroverigsky Lane St., 101990, Moscow
References
1. Sullivan RKP, Woldemussie E, Pow DV. Dendritic and synaptic plasticity of neurons in the human age-related macular degeneration retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jun; 48 (6): 2782–91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1283
2. Neroeva N.V., Zueva M.V., Neroev V.V., et al. Electrophysiological signs of retinal cone remodeling in geographic atrophy of the pigment epithelium in patients with non-exudative age-related macular degeneration. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2021; 14 (3): 32–9 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2021-14-3-32-39
3. Neroev VV, Zueva MV, Neroeva NV, et al. Clinical and functional characteristics of secondary geographic atrophy against the background of exudative age-related macular degeneration. Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2021; 76 (4): 384–93 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn1557
4. Zueva M.V., Kotelin V.I., Neroeva N.V., Zhuravleva A.N., Tsapenko I.V. Virtual reality in visual rehabilitation. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2024; 17 (3): 113–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-3-113-118
5. Zueva MV. Fractality of sensations and the brain health: the theory linking neurodegenerative disorder with distortion of spatial and temporal scale-invariance and fractal complexity of the visible world. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2015; 7: 135. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00135
6. Zueva M.V., Kotelin V.I., Neroeva N.V., Fadeev V.V., Manko O.M. Problems and prospects of new methods of light stimulation in visual rehabilitation. Sensory Systems. 2023; 37 (2): 93–118 (In Russ.). doi: 10.31857/S0235009223020075
7. Zueva MV, Neroeva NV, Zhuravleva AN, et al. Fractal phototherapy in maximizing retina and brain plasticity. In: Di Ieva A. (eds.) The fractal geometry of the brain. Advances in neurobiology. 2024; 36: 585–637. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_31
8. Neroev V.V., Zueva M.V., Neroeva N.V., et al. Effect of fractal visual stimulation on healthy rabbit retina: functional, morphometric and biochemical studies. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2022; 15 (3): 99–111 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-3-99-111
9. Balatskaya N.V., Fadeev V.V., Zueva M.V., Neroeva N.V. Local production of neurotrophic factors under the influence of fractal stimulation phototherapy on the retina of rabbits. Molecular medicine. 2023; 21 (3): 52–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29296/24999490-2023-05-08-52-58
10. Fadeev D.V., Neroeva N.V., Zueva M.V., et al. Fractal phototherapy: impact on the structure and function of the retina of rabbits with modelled retinal pigment epithelium atrophy. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2024; 17 (2): 74–81 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-2-74-81
11. Neroev V.V., Zueva M.V., Manakhov P.A., et al. A method for improving the functional activity of the visual system using fractal phototherapy using a stereoscopic display. Patent RF No. 2773684. 2022 (In Russ.).
12. Robson AG, Frishman LJ, Grigg J, et al. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2022 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun; 144 (3): 165–77. doi: 10.1007/s10633-022-09872-0
13. Frishman L, Sustar M, Kremers J, et al. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun; 136 (3): 207–11. doi: 10.1007/s10633-018-9638-x
14. Hoffmann MB, Bach M, Kondo M, et al. ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2021 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb; 142 (1): 5–16. doi: 10.1007/s10633-020-09812-w
15. Williams J, Ramaswamy D, Oulhaj A. 10 Hz flicker improves recognition memory in older people. BMC Neurosci. 2006; 7 (5): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-7-21
16. Williams JH. Frequency-specific effects of flicker on recognition memory. Neuroscience. 2001; 104: 283–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00579-0
17. Aks D, Sprott J. Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns. Empir Stud Arts. Jan 1996; 14 (1): 1–16. doi:10.2190/6V31-7M9R-T9L5-CDG9
18. Taylor RP, Spehar B, Wise JA, et al. Perceptual and physiological responses to the visual complexity of fractal patterns. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2005 Jan; 9 (1): 89–114. PMID: 15629069.
19. Taylor RP, Sprott JC. Biophilic fractals and the visual journey of organic Screen-savers. J Non-Linear Dyn Psychol Life Sci. 2008; 12: 117–29. https://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pubs/paper311.pdf
20. Taylor RP, Spehar B, Donkelaar PV, Hagerhall CM. Perceptual and physiological responses to Jackson Pollock’s fractals. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5: 60. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00060
21. Pyankova S.D. Fractal-analytical research in psychology: features of perception of self-similar objects. Psychological research. 2016; 9 (46): 12 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v9i46.484
22. Pyankova S.D. Subjective assessments of the visual complexity and aesthetic appeal of fractal images: individual differences and genetic influences. Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya. 2019; 12 (63) (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v12i63.238
23. Zueva M.V., Kovalevskaya M.A., Donkareva O.V., et al. Fractal phototherapy in the neuroprotection of glaucoma. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2019; 16 (3): 317–28 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2019-3-317-328
24. Zueva M.V., ed. Nonlinear eye: New technologies of visual rehabilitation. St. Petersburg: BMM Publishing House; 2024 (In Russ.).
25. Coco-Mart n MB, Cuadrado-Asensio R, L pez-Miguel A. Design and evaluation of a customized reading rehabilitation program for patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120 (1): 151–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.035
Review
For citations:
Neroeva N.V., Zueva M.V., Kotelin V.I., Tsapenko I.V., Katargina L.A., Timofeev Yu.S. Influence of fractal photostimulation on electroretinogram in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2025;18(2):80-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2025-18-2-80-89