Prognostic factors of functional results of surgery for idiopathic (primary) epimacular membranes: the duration of epimacular proliferation. Part 1
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-2-99-104
Abstract
Part 1 of the review presents types of epimacular membranes (EMM), their epidemiology and management standard, topography of normal fovea seen on the optical coherence tomography, as well as dependence of functional results of surgery on disease duration.
About the Authors
S. G. Toropygin
Tver State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergei G. Toropygin — Dr. of Med. Sci., assistant professor, head of chair of ophthalmology
4, Sovetskaya St., Tver, 170100
S. V. Nazarova
Tver State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislava V. Nazarova — postgraduate student, chair of ophthalmology
4, Sovetskaya St., Tver, 170100
H. Dawarah
Tver State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Haiyan Dawarah — ophthalmologist, chair of ophthalmology
4, Sovetskaya St., Tver, 170100
A. N. Maslov
Tver State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander N. Maslov — assistant professor, the chair of physics, mathematics and medical informatics
4, Sovetskaya St., Tver, 170100
References
1. Toropygin S.G. Surgery of thin intraocular structures. Tver: IP Orlova Z.P; 2014 (in Russian)
2. Wickham L., Gregor Z. Epiretinal membranes. 5th ed. Los Angeles; 2013: 1954–61. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4557-0737-9.00116-8
3. Iwanoff A. Beitrage zur normalen und pathologischen Anatomie des Auges. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1865; 11: 135–70.
4. Charles S., Calzada J., Wood B. Vitreous microsurgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007.
5. Ducournau D., Ducournau Y., Kuhn F. Surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane and macular edema. A new concept based on a personal experience of over 16000 cases. Multimedia interactive book. 2011.
6. Bowling B. Kanski's clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approach, 8 th edition. Sydney, Australia: Elsevier; 2016.
7. Gass J.D.M. Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases. Diagnosis and Treatment, ed. 3. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1987.
8. Hartmann K.I., Schuster A.K., Bartsch D.-U., et al. Restoration of retinal layers after epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina. 2014; 34 (4): 647–54. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000003
9. Meuer S.M., Myers C.E., Klein B.E., et al. The epidemiology of vitreoretinal interface abnormalities as detected by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122 (12): 787–95. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.009
10. You Q., Xu L., Jonas J.B. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in adult Chinese: the Beijing eye study. Eye. 2008; 22: 874–9. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702786
11. Cheung N., Tan S.P., Lee S.Y., et al. Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membrane: the Singapore epidemiology of eye disease study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2016; 101 (3): 371–6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308563
12. Ng C.H., Cheung N., Wang J.J., et al. Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membranes in a multi-ethnic United States population. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118 (4): 694–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.009
13. Mitchell P., Smith W., Chey T., et al. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes. The Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104: 1033–40. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(97)30190-0
14. Dupas B., Tayayoni R., GaudricA. Epiretinal membranes. J. Fr. Ophthalmol. 2015; 38 (9): 861–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.08.004
15. Koen S.I., Kvintel' G. Fluorescence angiography in the diagnosis of fundus pathology. Тranslation from English. Moscow: Rejtar; 2005 (in Russian)
16. Machemer R. The surgical removal of epiretinal macular membranes (macular puckers) (author’s transl.). Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 1978; 173: 36–42.
17. Yonekawa Y., Abbey A.M., Shah A.R., et al. Endoilluminator phototoxic maculopathy associated with combined ICG-assisted epiretinal membrane and internal limiting membrane peeling. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2014; 8: 2501-6. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S75592
18. Aras C., Arici C., Acar S., et al. Peeling of internal limiting membrane during vitrectomy for complicated retinal detachment prevents epimacular membrane formation. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2009; 247 (5): 619–23. doi:10.1007/s00417-008-1025-y
19. Fleissig E., Zur D., Moisseiev E., et al. Five-year follow-up after epiretinal membrane surgery. A single-center experience. Retina. 2019; 38 (7): 1415–9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001711
20. Khokhar A.R., Rab K.F., Akhtar H.U. Management of macular pucker. J. Coll. Physicians Surg. Pak. 2003; 13: 701–3. doi:12.2003/JCPSP.701703
21. Park D.W., Dugel P.U., Garda J., et al. Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110 (1): 62–4. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01440-9
22. Gaudric A., Cohen D. Chirurgie des membranes epimaculaires idiopathiques. Facteurs pronostiques. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 1992; 15: 657–68.
23. Kim J., Rhee K.M., Woo S.J., et al. Long-term temporal changes of macular thickness and visual outcome after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2010; 150 (5): 701–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.037
24. Margherio R.R., Cox M.S., Trese M.T., et al. Removal of epimacular membranes. Ophthalmology. 1985; 92 (8): 1075–83. doi:10.1016/S01616420(85)33902-7
25. Mc Donald H.R., Verre W.P., Aaberg T.M. Surgical management of idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93: 978–83.
26. Michels R.G. Vitreous surgery for macular pucker. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1981; 92 (5): 628–39. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74654-9
27. Rice T.A., De Bustros S., Michels R.G., et al. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93 (5): 602–10. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(86)33689-3
28. Suh M.H., Seo J.M., Park K.H., Yu H.G. Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 147 (3): 473–80. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2008.09.020
29. Thompson J.T. Vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes with good visual acuity. Trans. Am. Ophthal. Soc. 2004; 102: 97–106.
30. Wong J.G., Sachdev N., Beaumont P.E., et al. Visual outcomes following vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membrane. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2005; 33 (4): 373–8. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01025.x
31. Mitamura Y., Hirano K., Baba T., Yamamoto S. Correlation of visual recovery with presence of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in optical coherence images after epiretinal membrane surgery. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 93 (2): 171–5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.146381
32. Kauffmann Y., Ramel J.C., Lefebvre A. Preoperative prognostic factors and predictive score in patients operated on for combined cataract and idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015; 160 (1): 185–192. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.03.027
33. Geerts L., Pertile G., van de Sompel W., et al. Vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes: visual outcome and prognostic criteria. Bull. Soc. Belge. Ophthalmol. 2004; 293: 7–15.
34. Pesin S.R., Olk R.J., Grand M.G., et al. Vitrectomy for premacular fibroplasia. Prognostic factors, long-term follow-up, and time course of visual improvement. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98 (7): 1109–14. doi:10.1016/S01616420(91)32169-9
35. Mayer W.J., Vogel M., Neubauer A., et al. Pars plana vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling in epimacular membranes: correlation of function and morphology across the macula. Ophthalmologica. 2013; 230: 9–17. doi:10.1159/000350233
36. Shimozono M., Oishi A., Hata M., et al. The significance of cone outer segment tips as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012; 153 (4): 698–704. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.011
37. Toropygin S.G., Moshetova L.K. Surgery for retinal internal limiting membrane (communication 1). Vestnik oftalmologii. 2009; 125 (6): 46–51 (in Russian)
38. Toropygin S.G., Moshetova L.K. Surgery for retinal internal limiting membrane (communication 2). Vestnik oftalmologii. 2009; 125(6): 51–5 (in Russian)
39. Filho C.A., Yehoshua Z., Gregori G. Optical coherence tomography in retina. Amsterdam: Elsivier; 2013: 82–110.
40. Schuman J.S., Pulliafito C.A. Optical coherence tomography of ocular diseases. Thorofare, NJ.: Slack.; 2004.
41. Agarwal A. Gass’ atlas of macular diseases, fifth edition. Elsevier; 2012. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2211-5
42. Lumbroso B., Rispoli M. OCT (retina, choroid, glaucoma). Тranslation from English. Moscow: BINOM; 2014 (in Russian)
43. LoDuca A.L., Zhang C., Zelkha R., Shahidi M. Thickness mapping of retinal layers by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2010; 150 (6): 849–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.034
44. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. ETDRS report number 7: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study design and baseline patient characteristics. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98 (5): 741–56. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(13)38009-9
45. Bentaleb-Machkour Z., Jouffroy E., Rabilloud M., et al. Comparison of central macular thickness measured by three OCT models and study of interoperator variability. Scientific World Journal. 2012. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2012/842795/ doi: 10.1100/2012/842795
46. Chan A., Duker J.S., Ko T.H., et al. Normal macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using Stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2006; 124: 193–8. doi:10.1001%2Farchopht.124.2.193
47. Ooto S., Hangai M., Sakamoto A., et al. Three-dimensional profile of macular retinal thickness in normal Japanese eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010; 51 (1): 465–73. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4047
48. Sull A.C., Vuong L.N., Price L.L., et al. Comparison of spectral/Fourier domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessment of normal macular thickness. Retina. 2010; 30: 235–45. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181bd2c3b
49. Grover S., Murthy R.K., Brar V.S., Chalam K.V. Normative data for macular thickness by high definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis). Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 148 (2): 266–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.006
50. Kelty P.J., Payne J.F., Trivedi R.H., et al. Macular thickness assessment in healthy eyes based on ethnicity using Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008; 49 (6): 2668–72. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1000
51. Chauhan D.S., Marshall J. The interpretation of optical coherence tomography images of the retina. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999; 40: 2332–42.
52. Srinivasan V.J., Monson B.K., Wojtkowski M., et al. Characterization of outer retinal morphology with high-speed, ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008; 49 (4): 1571–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0838
53. Alamouti B., Funk J. Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003; 87 (7): 899–901. doi:10.1136%2Fbjo.87.7.899
54. Zhao Z., Zhou X., Jiang C., Sun X. Effect of myopia on different areas and layers of the macula: a Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography study of a Chinese cohort. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15: 90. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0080-5
55. Higashide T., Ohkubo S., Hangai M., et al. Influence of clinical factors and magnification correction on normal thickness profiles of macular retinal layers using optical coherence tomography. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11 (1): e0147782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147782
56. Zajko N.N., Butenko G.M., Bytc' Yu.V. Pathological physiology. Moscow: Elista AOZT “Esen”; 1994 (in Russian)
57. Mukhin N.A., Moiseev V.S. Propaedeutic of internal diseases. Moscow: GEOTAR–Media; 2013 (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Toropygin S.G., Nazarova S.V., Dawarah H., Maslov A.N. Prognostic factors of functional results of surgery for idiopathic (primary) epimacular membranes: the duration of epimacular proliferation. Part 1. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(2):99-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-2-99-104
Views:
701
Email this article 