Preview

Russian Ophthalmological Journal

Advanced search

Our experience of posterior polar cataract phacoemulsification

https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-3-81-87

Abstract

Purpose: to analyze posterior polar cataract (PPC) phacoemulsification results with regard to surgery technique.

Materials and methods. 14 PPC patients (26 eyes) were examined; 8 of them under 50 years and 6, over 50. Before surgery, visual acuity was 0.3–0.6. The operations were performed by one and the same surgeon on an Infiniti Vision System phacoemulsifier (Alcon). In all cases, posterior chamber IOLs were implanted (in 24 cases, complete intracapsular fixation was achieved, in 2 cases, mixed fixation). The follow-up was 1 to 10 years. The main features of the proposed surgery technique: 1) to ensure a stable position of the anterior/posterior chamber, the introduction of solutions and  capsulorhexis are carried out through paracentesis before the main incision is made, 2) complete rejection of hydrodissection, hydrodelineation at the stage of preparation for the emulsification  of the core itself, as well as rejection of additional  hydrodissection of residual epinucleus before its aspiration, 3) the choice of constant torsion ultrasound mode to reduce the oscillatory movements of nuclear fragments, 4) reduction of hydrodynamic parameters (irrigation bottle height no more than 70 mm, aspiration no more than 30 cc/min, vacuum no more than 250 mmHg on the Infiniti  Vision System), 5) technique of sequential segmental stepwise fracture of the nucleus during emulsification  with minimal  rotation of fragments while reducing the ultrasonic power (up to 30%),  6) selection of a separate bimanual  irrigation / aspiration technique for a more predictable anterior chamber depth, in particular when extracting tips that can be carried out separately, 7) rejection of polishing the posterior capsule for the prevention of mechanical  contact and damage to the posterior capsule.

Results. The postoperative period was uneventful. Best corrected visual acuity improved in all patients: to 0.4–0.5 (4), 0.6–0.8 (16), 0.9–1.0 (6). In the late postoperative period, 4 patients required a laser dissection of secondary opacities in the posterior lens capsule.

Conclusion. The obtained functional results demonstrate the possibility of successful phacoemulsification with the minimum incidence of complications in patients with PPC. In the reported practice, the known surgical techniques aimed at reducing pressure fluctuations in the capsule bag as well as in the anterior chamber as a whole, were used.

About the Authors

I. E. Ioshin
Clinical Hospital, Office of the President of Russia
Russian Federation

Igor E. Ioshin — Dr.  of Med.  Sci.,  professor, head  of ophthalmological department.

45, Losinoostrovskaya St., Moscow, 107143



A. I. Tolchinskaya
Clinical Hospital, Office of the President of Russia
Russian Federation

Anna I. Tolchinskaya — Dr. of Med.  Sci., ophthalmologist.

45, Losinoostrovskaya St., Moscow, 107143



A. A. Ozderbayeva
Clinical Hospital, Office of the President of Russia
Russian Federation

Aina A. Ozderbayeva — Сand. of Med.  Sci., ophthalmologist.

45, Losinoostrovskaya St., Moscow, 107143



A. M. Baghirov
Clinical Hospital, Office of the President of Russia
Russian Federation

Azer M.Baghirov — ophthalmologist.

45, Losinoostrovskaya St., Moscow, 107143



References

1. Vasavada A.R., Vasavada V.A. Managing the posterior polar cataract: An update. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 65 (12 Dec.): 1350–8. http:// doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_707_17

2. Vasavada A.R., Vasavada V., Vasavada S., et al. Femtodelineation to enhance safety in posterior polar cataracts. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2015; 41: 702–7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.02.021

3. Titiyal J.S., Kaur M., Sharma N. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery technique to enhance safety in posterior polar cataract. J. Refract. Surg. 2015; 31: 826–8. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20150824-01

4. Alder B.D., Donaldson K.E. Comparison of 2 techniques for managing posterior polar cataracts: traditional phacoemulsification versus femtosecond laserassisted cataract surgery. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2014; 40: 2148–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.030

5. Nagappa S., Das S., Kurian M., et al. Modified technique for epinucleus removal in posterior polar cataract. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging. 2011; 42: 78–80. https://doi:10.3928/15428877-20101025-01

6. Lee M.W., Lee Y.C. Phacoemulsification of posterior polar cataracts – a surgical challenge. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003; 87: 1426–7.

7. Vasavada A., Singh R. Step-by-step chop in situ and separation of very dense cataracts. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 1998; 24: 156–9.

8. Ioshin I.E. Phacoemulsification. Moscow: April; 2012 (in Russian).

9. Ioshin I.E. Ambulatory cataract surgery. Moscow: April; 2016 (in Russian).

10. Siatiri H., Moghimi S. Posterior polar cataract: minimizing risk of posterior capsule rupture. Eye (Lond). 2006; 20: 814–6.

11. Anis A.Y. Understanding hydrodelineation: the term and the procedure. Doc. Ophthalmol. 1994; 87: 123–37.

12. Masket S. Consultation section. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 1997; 23: 819–82.

13. Vasavada A.R., Raj S.M. Inside-out delineation. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2004; 30: 1167–9.

14. Allen D., Wood C. Minimizing risk to the capsule during surgery for posterior polar cataract. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2002; 28: 742–4.

15. Lee M.W., Lee Y.C. Phacoemulsification of posterior polar cataracts – a surgical challenge. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003; 87: 1426–7.

16. Vasavada A.R., Singh R. Phacoemulsification with posterior polar cataract. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 1999; 25: 238–45.

17. Osher R.H., Yu B.C., Koch D.D. Posterior polar cataracts: a predisposition to intraoperative posterior capsular rupture. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 1990; 16: 157–62.

18. Hayashi K., Hayashi H., Nakao F, Hayashi F. Outcomes of surgery for posterior polar cataract. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2003; 29: 45–9.

19. Fine I.H., Packer M., Hoffman R.S. Management of posterior polar cataract. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2003; 29: 16–9.

20. Das S., Khanna R., Mohiuddin S.M., Ramamurthy B. Surgical and visual outcomes for posterior polar cataract. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008; 92: 1476–8.

21. Kumar S., Ram J., Sukhija J., Severia S. Phacoemulsification in posterior polar cataract: does size of lens opacity affect surgical outcome? Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2010; 38: 857–61. http://doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02354.x

22. Kymionis G.D., Diakonis V.F., Liakopoulos D.A., et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography for demonstrating posterior capsular rent in posterior polar cataract. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014; 8: 215–7. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S55763

23. Titiyal J.S., Kaur M., Falera R. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography in anterior segment surgeries. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 65: 116–21.

24. Haripriya A., Aravind S., Vadi K., Natchiar G. Bimanual microphaco for posterior polar cataracts. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2006; 32: 914–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.049

25. Chee S.P. Management of the hard posterior polar cataract. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2007; 33: 1509–14.


Review

For citations:


Ioshin I.E., Tolchinskaya A.I., Ozderbayeva A.A., Baghirov A.M. Our experience of posterior polar cataract phacoemulsification. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(3):81-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-3-81-87

Views: 871


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0076 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5760 (Online)