Quality of life as viewed from cataract surgery: traditional and perspective approaches
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-1-153-157
Abstract
The review presents an analysis of traditional and promising approaches to assessing the quality of life (QoL) in cataract surgery. Literature data indicate statistically significant correlations between QoL and objective indicators of the visual system both during the initial examination of the patient and, more importantly, in the course of therapy. Traditional approaches to the study of QoL in cataract surgery reveal a trend towards the development of targeted questionnaires featuring optimized psychometric testing of questions and the procedure for scaling answers. New QoL questionnaires are developed in order to improve the collection and evaluation of information by taking into account the quantitative assessment of patient complaints made by an expert ophthalmologist, who can reliably evaluate their impact on QoL. It also seems appropriate to use the "International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health", develop more targeted questionnaires aimed at assessing modern aspects of cataract surgery, and optimize the study itself.
About the Authors
D. F. Pokrovsky
Russian N.I. Pirogov Scientific Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitry F. Pokrovsky - Cand. of Med. Sci., associate professor of chair of ophthalmology
1, Ostrovityanova, St., Moscow, 117997
N. I. Ovechkin
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay I. Ovechkin - Cand. of Med. Sci., head of the operating unit
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
V. E. Yudin
Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir E. Yudin - Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, head of the department of medical rehabilitation and physical methods of treatment with courses of osteopathy and palliative care
11, Volokolamskoe Hgwy, Moscow, 125080
I. G. Ovechkin
Academy of Postgraduate Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor G. Ovechkin - Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, professor of chair of ophthalmology
91, Volokolamskoe Hgwy, Moscow, 125371
References
1. Weih L.M., Hassell J.B., Keeffe J. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. 2002 Apr; 43 (4): 927–35. PMID: 11923230
2. Kon A.A. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA. 2010; 304 (8): 903–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1208
3. Azoulay-Sebban L., Zhao Z., Zenouda A., Lombardi M. Correlations between subjective evaluation of quality of life, visual field loss, and performance in simulated activities of daily living in glaucoma patients. J. Glaucoma. 2020; 29 (10): 970–4. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001597
4. Marino P.F., Rossi M., Campagna G., Capobianco D., Costagliola C. Effects of Citicoline, Homotaurine, and Vitamin E on contrast sensitivity and visualrelated quality of life in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma: a preliminary study. Molecules. 2020; 25 (23): 5614. doi: 10.3390/molecules25235614
5. Ng H., Vermeer K.A., van Meurs J.C., La Heij E.C. Visual acuity inadequately reflects vision-related quality of life in patients after macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020; 61 (10): 34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.10.34
6. He L., Cui Y., Tang X., et al. Changes in visual function and quality of life in patients with senile cataract following phacoemulsification. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2020; 9 (6): 3802–9. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1709
7. Libman E.S. Approaches to assessing the quality of life of ophthalmic patients. Russian medical journal. Clinical ophthalmology. 2002; 3 (3): 119–21 (in Russian).
8. Novik A.A., Ionova T.I. Guidelines for the study of the life quality in medicine. Saint-Petersburg: ZAO OLMA Media Group; 2007 (in Russian).
9. Morris A., Perez D., McNoe B. The use of quality of life data in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research. 1998; 7 (1): 85–91. doi: 10.1023/a:1008893007068
10. Malyshev A.V., Semykin V.D., Karapetov G.Yu. Methods for assessing the quality of life of a patient in ophthalmic practice. Modern optometry. 2015; 7: 34–9 (in Russian).
11. Malyugin B.E. Cataract surgery and intraocular correction at the present stage of development of ophthalmosurgery. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2014; 6: 80–8 (in Russian).
12. Fraser M.L. Vision, quality of life and depressive symptoms after first eye cataract surgery. Psychogeriatrics. 2013; 46 (9): 16–8. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12028
13. Kirwan C., Lanigan B., O’Keefe M.J. Vision-related quality of life assessment using the NEI-VFQ-25 in adolescents and young adults with a history of congenital cataract. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus. 2012; 49 (1): 26–31. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20110517-02
14. Alchinova A.S., Morina K.Yu., Rakhmanov V.V., Potemkin V.V., Khripun K.V. Comparison of visual functions and satisfaction with the quality of vision in patients after AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1 multifocal IOL implantation and various models of monofocal IOLs. Oftal’mologicheski vedomosti. 2016; 9 (4): 5–12 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17816/OV20164
15. Chatziralli P., Sergentanis N., Peponis G., et al. Risk factors for poor visionrelated quality of life among cataract patients. Evaluation of baseline data. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2013; 251 (3): 783–9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2194-2
16. Kyei S., Amponsah B.K., Asiedu K., Akoto Y.O. Visual function, spectacle independence, and patients' satisfaction after cataract surgery — a study in the Central Region of Ghana. Afr. Health. Sci. 2021; 21 (1): 445–56. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i1.55
17. Samadi B., Lundström M., Kugelberg M. Improving patient-assessed outcomes after cataract surgery. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2017; 27 (4): 454–9. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000927
18. Lundström M., Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2009; 35 (3): 504–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.11.038
19. Lundström M., Pesudovs K. Questionnaires for measuring cataract surgery outcomes. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2011; 37 (5): 945–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.010
20. Gothwal V.K., Wright T.A., Lamoureux E.L., et al. Improvements in visual ability with first eye, second eye and bilateral cataract surgery measured with the visual symptoms and quality of life questionnaire. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2011; 37 (7): 1208–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.028
21. Gothwal V.K., Wright T.A., Lamoureux E.L., et al. Cataract Symptom Scale: clarifying measurement. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 93 (12): 1652–6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.159806
22. Lim M.E., Minotti S.C., D'Silva C., et al. Predicting changes in cataract surgery health outcomes using a cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization instrument. PLoS One. 2021; 16 (1): e0246104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246104
23. DeVellis R.F. Classical test theory. Med. Care. 2006; 44 (11, Suppl 3): 50–9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245426.10853.30
24. Massof R.W. The measurement of vision disability. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2002; 79 (8): 516–52. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200208000-00015
25. Bond T.G., Fox C.M. Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. The second edition. New York; London: Routledge Taylor Francis Group; 2007.
26. Grigorieva V.N., Sagildina A.O., Grigorieva K.A., Demareva V.A. Rush analysis of the metric properties of the health satisfaction questionnaire. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2011; 6 (1): 391–8 (in Russian).
27. McAlinden C., Gothwal V.K., Khadka J., et al. A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118 (12): 2374–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.008
28. Jеbb A.T., Ng V., Tay L. A review of Key Likert Scale development advances: 1995-2019. Front Psychol. 2021; 12: 637547. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547
29. Lee J.H., Han K., Kim T.H., Kim A.R., Kwon O. Acupuncture for dry eye syndrome after refractive surgery: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Integr. Med. Res. 2021; 10 (1): 100456. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100456
30. Seguí M., Cabrero-García J., Crespo A., et al. A reliable and valid questionnaire was developed to measure computer vision syndrome at the workplace J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2015; 68 (6): 662–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.015
31. Ovechkin I.G., Malyshev A.V., Karapetov G.Yu. Methodological foundations for the development of a methodology for assessing the quality of life in patients with various types of vitreoretinal pathology. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2015; 12 (4): 75–9 (in Russian). doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2015-4-75-79
32. Ovechkin I.G., Yudin V.E., Kovrigina E.I., Budko A.A., Matvienko V.V. Methodological principles for the development of a questionnaire “Quality of Life” in Patients with Computer Visual Syndrome. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021; 18 (4): 926–31 (in Russian). doi. org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-926-931
33. Xue W.W., Zou H.D. Rasch analysis of the Chinese version of the Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 55 (8): 582–8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.08.007
34. Şahlı E., Aysun S. İdil S. A. Comparison of quality of life questionnaires in patients with low vision. Turk. J. Ophthalmol. 2021; 51 (2): 83–8. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.99975
35. Belkin A.A., Ivanova G.E., Alasheev A.M., Pinchuk E.A., Sheljakin V.A. The first experience of multidisciplinary examination of the quality of medical care for patients with acute cerebrovascular accident at the stages of intensive care and rehabilitation]. B ulletin of restorative medicine and rehabilitation. 2 018; 2: 13–9 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2020-96-2-13-17
36. Shmonin A.A., Mal'ceva M.N., Mel'nikova E.V., Ivanova G.E. Basic principles of medical rehabilitation, rehabilitation diagnosis in the ICF categories and a rehabilitation plan]. B ulletin of restorative medicine and rehabilitation. 2017; 2: 16–22 (in Russian).
37. Malvankar-Mehta M.S., Chen Y.N., Patel S., et al. Immediate versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 10 (6): e0131857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131857
38. Miller K.M., Oetting T.A., Tweeten J.P., et al. Cataract in the adult eye preferred practice pattern. Ophthalmology. 2022; 129 (1): 1–126. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.10.006.
39. Labiris G., Giarmoukakis A., Patsiamanidi M., et al. Mini-monovision versus multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2015; 41 (1): 53–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.015
40. McAlinden C., Pesudovs K., Moore J.E. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2010; 51 (11): 5537–45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5341
41. Haley S.M., Fragala-Pinkham M.A., Dumas H.M., et al. Evaluation of an item bank for a computerized adaptive test of activity in children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2009; 89 (6): 589–600. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090007
42. Eguchi A., Hasegawa H., Kinouchi H., Murakami A., Kobayashi H. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease. BMJ Open. 2019; 9 (11): e033940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033940
Review
For citations:
Pokrovsky D.F., Ovechkin N.I., Yudin V.E., Ovechkin I.G. Quality of life as viewed from cataract surgery: traditional and perspective approaches. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2022;15(1):153-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-1-153-157
Views:
674
Email this article 