Clinical and morphological aspects of the development of secondary ophthalmic hypertension in uveal melanoma
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-2-11-17
Abstract
Ophthalmic hypertension is mostly associated with medium- or large-sized melanomas. The pathogenesis of persistent IOP elevation in uveal melanoma is not fully understood at present.
Purpose. To analyze the clinical and morphological mechanisms of the development of secondary ophthalmic hypertension in patients with uveal melanoma.
Material and methods. The case histories of 26 patients with T3N0M0-T4N0M0 uveal melanoma were analyzed retrospectively from 2015 to 2019. The main group included 18 patients with secondary monolateral IOP elevation while the control group was composed of 8 patients with normal IOP. Tumors in both groups were comparable in size. All patients underwent eradication treatment (enucleation/exenteration). Enucleated eys were histologically examined.
Results. Pronounced pathological changes of the iridocorneal angle, iris and ciliary body were found morphologically in all specimens with elevated IOP. The following dominating mechanisms ofophthalmic hypertension were detected: iris and anterior chamber angle neovascularization; tumor-associated chronic uveitis; obstruction of trabecular meshwork by cellular elements (pigment-rich macrophages, blood cells, inflammatory cells); fibrosis and deformation of trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal; closed angle glaucoma with lens-iris diaphragm shift; tumor invasion into the angle.
Conclusions. Investigation of morphological changes in patients with UM and found resemblances with already studied non-tumor forms of glaucoma may help find previously undetectable receptors for the development of targeted anti-tumor drugs.
Keywords
About the Authors
E. E. GrishinaRussian Federation
Elena E. Grishina, Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, principal chief researcher
ophthalmology department
129110
61/2 Shchepkina St.
Moscow
G. R. Setdikova
Russian Federation
Galia R. Setdikova, Dr. of Med. Sci., head of the unit
department of oncology
morphology diagnostics unit
129110
61/2 Shchepkina St.
Moscow
I. D. Kim
Russian Federation
Igor D. Kim, resident
ophthalmology department
129110
61/2 Shchepkina St.
Moscow
A. M. Bogatyrev
Russian Federation
Alexander M. Bogatyrev, junior researcher
ophthalmology department
129110
61/2 Shchepkina St.
Moscow
I. A. Loskutov
Russian Federation
Igor A. Loskutov, Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, head of the department
chair of ophthalmology and optometry
ophthalmology department
129110
61/2 Shchepkina St.
Moscow
E. R. Eremeeva
Russian Federation
Elizaveta R. Eremeeva, pathologist
department of oncology
morphology diagnostics unit
129110
61/2 Shchepkina St.
Moscow
References
1. Гришина Е. Е. Эпидемиология увеальной меланомы в г. Москве / Е. Е. Гришина, М. Ю. Лернер, Э. Г. Гемджян // Альманах клинической медицины. – 2017. – 45 (4): 321–5. [Grishina E. E., Lerner M. Yu., Gemdzhian E. G. Epidemiology of uveal melanomas in Moscow. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2017; 45 (4): 321–5 (in Russian)]. https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2017-45-4-321-325
2. Singh A. D., Turell M. E., Topham A. K. Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment and survival. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118 (9): 1881–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.040
3. Shields C. L., Kaliki S., Furuta M., et al. Clinical spectrum and prognosis of uveal melanoma based on age at presentation in 8,033 cases. Retina 2012; 32 (7): 1363–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e31824d09a8
4. Shields C. L., Shields J. A., Shields M. B., Augsburger J. J. Prevalence and mechanisms of secondary intraocular pressure elevation in eyes with intraocular tumors. Ophthalmology. 1987; 94 (7): 839–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33537-7
5. Гришина Е. Е. Офтальмогипертензия, ассоциированная с увеальной меланомой. Причины диагностических ошибок / Е. Е. Гришина, А. М. Богатырев, И. А. Лоскутов // Национальный журнал "Глаукома". – 2021. – 20 (4): 45–9. [Grishina E.E., Bogatirev A. M., Loskutov I. A. Ophthalmic hypertension associated with uveal melanoma. Causes of diagnostic errors. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2021; 20 (4): 45–9 (in Russian)]. https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/356
6. Бровкина А. Ф. Вторичная глаукома при внутриглазных опухолях / А. Ф. Бровкина // РМЖ. Клиническая Офтальмология. – 2003. – 4 (2): 49. [Brovkina A. F. Secondary glaucoma in intraocular tumors. Russian journal of clinical ophthalmology. 2003; 4 (2): 49 (in Russian)].
7. Demirci H., Shields C. L., Shields J. A., Eagle Jr R. C., Honavar S. Ring melanoma of the anterior chamber angle: a report of fourteen cases. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2001; 132 (3): 336–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01051-0
8. Castella A. P., Bercher L., Zografos L., Egger E., Herbort C. P. Study of the blood-aqueous barrier in choroidal melanoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1995; 79 (4): 354–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.4.354
9. Lin W. W., Karin M. A cytokine-mediated link between innate immunity, inflammation, and cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2007; 117 (5): 1175–83. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci31537
10. Lee S. Y., Ju M. K., Jeon H. M., et al. Regulation of Tumor Progression by Programmed Necrosis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018; 2018: 3537471. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3537471
11. Senthil S., Dada T., Das T., et al. Neovascular glaucoma - a review. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021; 69 (3): 525–34. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1591_20
12. Dunavoelgyi R., Funk M., Sacu S., et al. Intraocular activation of angiogenic and inflammatory pathways in uveal melanoma. Retina. 2012; 32 (7): 1373–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e318239e299
13. Boyd S. R., Tan D. S., de Souza L., et al. Uveal melanomas express vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor and support endothelial cell growth. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002; 86 (4): 440–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.4.440
14. Stamer W. D., Braakman S. T., Zhou E. H., et al. Biomechanics of Schlemm's canal endothelium and intraocular pressure reduction. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2015; 44: 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.08.002
15. Yanoff M., Scheie H. G. Melanomalytic glaucoma. Report of a case. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1970; 84 (4): 471–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1970.00990040473013
16. Van Buskirk E. M., Leure Du Pree A. E. Pathophysiology and electron microscopy of melanomalytic glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1978; 85 (2): 160–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75942-2
17. Lai K., Conway R. M., Crouch R., Jager M. J., Madigan M. C. Expression and distribution of MMPs and TIMPs in human uveal melanoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2008; 86 (6): 936–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.03.010
18. Esser P., Grisanti S., Bartz-Schmidt K. TGF-beta in uveal melanoma. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2001; 52 (4): 396–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0029(20010215)52:4%3C396::aid-jemt1024%3E3.0.co;2-v
19. Usui Y., Tsubota K., Agawa T., et al. Aqueous immune mediators in malignant uveal melanomas in comparison to benign pigmented intraocular tumors. Graefe's Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2017; 255 (2): 393–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3541-5
20. Nagarkatti-Gude N., Bronkhorst I. H., van Duinen S. G., Luyten G. P., Jager M. J. Cytokines and chemokines in the vitreous fluid of eyes with uveal melanoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012; 53 (11): 6748–55. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10123
21. Мякошина Е. Б. Роль хемокинов классов CXC и CC у больных с увеальной меланомой / Е. Б. Мякошина [и др.] // Вестник офтальмологии. – 2021. – 137 (4): 31–7. [Myakoshina E. B., Kulikova I. G., Balatskaya N. V., Katargina L. A., Saakyan S. V. The role of CXC and CC chemokines in patients with uveal melanoma. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2021; 137 (4): 31–7 (in Russian)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202113704131
22. Саакян С. В. Клеточное микроокружение увеальной меланомы: клинико-морфологические корреляции и предикторы неблагоприятного прогноза / С. В. Саакян, Г. П. Захарова, Е. Б. Мякошина // Молекулярная медицина. – 2020. – 18 (3): 27–33. [Saakyan S. V., Zakharova G. P., Myakoshina E. B. Cellular microenvironment of uveal melanoma: clinical and morphological correlations and predictors of bad prognosis. Molecular medicine 2020; 18 (3): 27–33 (in Russian)]. https://doi.org/10.29296/24999490-2020-03-04
23. Свинарева Д. И. Роль матриксных металлопротеиназ в патогенезе первичной открытоугольной глаукомы / Д. И. Свинарева, М. И. Чурносов // Вестник офтальмологии. – 2020. – 136 (4): 146–50. [Svinareva D. I., Churnosov M. I. The role of metalloproteinases in the development of primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2020; 136 (4): 146–50 (in Russian)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136041146
24. Rönkkö S., Rekonen P., Kaarniranta K., et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in the chamber angle of normal eyes and patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and exfoliation glaucoma. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2007; 245 (5): 697–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-006-0440-1
25. Igarashi N., Honjo M., Yamagishi R., et al. Crosstalk between transforming growth factor ß-2 and Autotaxin in trabecular meshwork and different subtypes of glaucoma. J. Biomed. Sci. 2021; 28 (1): 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-021-00745-3
Review
For citations:
Grishina E.E., Setdikova G.R., Kim I.D., Bogatyrev A.M., Loskutov I.A., Eremeeva E.R. Clinical and morphological aspects of the development of secondary ophthalmic hypertension in uveal melanoma. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2022;15(2):11-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-2-11-17