Preview

Russian Ophthalmological Journal

Advanced search

Epidemiology of primary angle-closure glaucoma in the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2025-18-1-7-16

Abstract

Purpose of the work: to study the epidemiological features of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation taking into account the risk factors for the development of the disease in different regions of the country. Material and methods. The analysis of the epidemiological indicators of PACG in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was carried out: the absolute number of patients, the relative number per 100 thousands of the region’s population, the share of PACG as a percentage of all glaucoma, socio-demographic characteristics (gender, average age of disease onset), anatomical features of the eye structure as a factor in the closure of the anterior chamber angle, the frequency of an acute attack of glaucoma, as well as the principles of PACG treatment. Results. The absolute number of patients with PACG in the studied regions of the Russian Federation is 50,857 people, the relative number per 100 thousands of the population of the studied entities is 33.7, the share of PACG in all glaucoma is 8.2 %. Analysis of the indicators in the regions of the Russian Federation revealed the highest absolute number of patients with PACG in the Tyumen Region (7,829 people), St. Petersburg (7,500), Kaliningrad Region (6,117) and the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) (5,562). The relative number indicators per 100 thousand population are also higher in the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) (759.3), Kaliningrad (738) and Tyumen Regions (486.7). The share of PACG as a percentage of all glaucoma is highest in the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) (51.4 %) and Tyumen Region (22 %). PACG prevails in women (66.6 %), the average age of disease onset was 59.5. Conclusion. The obtained results, consistent with the data of numerous international studies, allow us to assess the current situation with PACG in the country for timely prevention, diagnosis and treatment of this disease.

About the Authors

V. V. Neroev
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases; A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Neroev — Academician of RAS, Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, director, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases; head of eye diseases chair of the faculty of additional professional education, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry.

14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062; 20, Bldg.1, Delegatskaya St., Moscow, 127473



T. N. Malishevskaya
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Tatiana N. Malishevskaya — Dr. of Med. Sci., head of the department of analytics.

14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062



S. Yu. Petrov
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Sergey Yu. Petrov — Dr. of Med. Sci., head of the glaucoma department.

14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062



S. M. Kosakyan
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Srbui M. Kosakyan – Cand. of Med. Sci., ophthalmologist of glaucoma department.

14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062



E. K. Zakharova
State Autonomous Institution of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) Yakutsk Republic Ophthalmological Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Ekaterina K. Zakharova — Cand. of Med. Sci., head of the ophthalmological department.

15, Sverdlova St., Yakutsk, 677005



References

1. Neroev V.V., Mikhaylova L.A., Malishevskaya T.N., Petrov S.Yu., Filippova O.M. Glaucoma epidemiology in the Russian Federation. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2024; 17 (3): 7–12 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2024-17-3-7-12

2. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90 (3): 262–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224

3. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121 (11): 2081–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

4. Chan EW, Li X, Tham YC, et al. Glaucoma in Asia: regional prevalence variations and future projections. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100 (1): 78–85. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306102

5. Cheng JW, Zong Y, Zeng YY, Wei RL. The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in adult Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7): e103222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103222

6. Song P, Wang J, Bucan K, Theodoratou E, Rudan I, Chan KY. National and subnational prevalence and burden of glaucoma in China: A systematic analysis. J Glob Health. 2017; 7 (2): 020705. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020705

7. Asia Pacific Glaucoma Guidelines: Kugler Publications; 2016

8. Bakunina N., Sotnikova Yu., Kuroyedov A., Gazizova I., Razhko Yu. Epidemiology, classification and genetics of angle-closure glaucoma. Ophthalmology. Eastern Europe. 2021; 11 (4): 529–38 (In Russ.). doi: 10.34883/PI.2021.11.4.037

9. Kiseleva O.A., Robustova O.V., Bessmertny A.M., Zakharova E.K., Avdeev R.V. Worldwide prevalence of primary glaucoma among different races and ethnicities. Ophthalmology. 2013; 10 (3): 5–8 (In Russ.).

10. George R, Panda S, Vijaya L. Blindness in glaucoma: primary open-angle glaucoma versus primary angle-closure glaucoma — A meta-analysis. Eye (Lond). 2022; 36 (11): 2099–105. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01802-9

11. Lee J, Park JS, Jeong Y, et al. Prevalence ratio of primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma in Asian population: A meta-analysis and multiple meta-regression analysis. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2024; 38 (1): 42–50. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2023.0057

12. Weinreb RN, Friedman DS. WGA Consensus Series 3: Angle closure and angle closure glaucoma: Kugler Publications; 2006.

13. Foster PJ, Alsbirk PH, Baasanhu J, et al Anterior chamber depth in Mongolians: variation with age, sex, and method of measurement. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 124 (1): 53–60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71644-7

14. Vijaya L, George R, Arvind H, et al. Prevalence of primary angle-closure disease in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115 (4): 655–60 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.034

15. Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Ma XY, et al. The prevalence of primary glaucoma in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma. 2013; 22 (4): 301–6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824083ca

16. He M, Wang D, Zheng Y, et al. Heritability of anterior chamber depth as an intermediate phenotype of angle-closure in Chinese: the Guangzhou Twin Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49 (1): 81–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1052

17. Bourne RR, Sukudom P, Foster PJ, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in Thailand: a population based survey in Rom Klao District, Bangkok. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87 (9): 1069–74. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.9.1069

18. Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, et al. Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110 (8): 1484–90. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00564-5

19. Raychaudhuri A, Lahiri SK, Bandyopadhyay M, et al. A population based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in rural West Bengal: the West Bengal Glaucoma Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89 (12): 1559–64. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.074948

20. Prum BE, Jr, Herndon LW, Jr, Moroi SE, et al. Primary Angle Closure Preferred Practice Pattern((R)) Guidelines. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123 (1): P1–P40. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.049

21. Qu W, Li Y, Song W, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for angle-closure disease in a rural Northeast China population: a population-based survey in Bin County, Harbin. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011; 89 (6): e515-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02146.x

22. Wong TY, Foster PJ, Seah SK, Chew PT. Rates of hospital admissions for primary angle closure glaucoma among Chinese, Malays, and Indians in Singapore. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84 (9): 990-2. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.9.990

23. Dandona L, Dandona R, Mandal P, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in an urban population in southern India. The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107 (9): 1710–6. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00274-8

24. Yamamoto T, Iwase A, Araie M, et al. The Tajimi Study report 2: prevalence of primary angle closure and secondary glaucoma in a Japanese population. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112 (10): 1661–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.012

25. Gong P, Liang S, Carlton EJ, et al. Urbanisation and health in China. Lancet. 2012; 379 (9818): 843–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61878-3

26. Teikari J, Raivio I, Nurminen M. Incidence of acute glaucoma in Finland from 1973 to 1982. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1987; 225 (5): 357–60. doi: 10.1007/BF02153405

27. Hu CC, Lin HC, Chen CS, Kuo N.W. Reduction in admissions of patients with acute primary angle closure occurring in conjunction with a rise in cataract surgery in Taiwan. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008; 86 (4): 440–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01066.x

28. Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A. Primary anterior chamber angle closure: progression from suspect to glaucoma. Part 1. Frequency and rate of transition from suspected primary angle closure to true angle closure and primary angle closure glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2022; 138 (4): 101–7 (In Russ.). doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2022138041101

29. Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A. Primary anterior chamber angle closure: progression from suspect to glaucoma. Part 2. Predictors of primary angle closure. Vestnik Oftal’mologii. 2022; 138 (4): 108–16 (In Russ.). doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2022138041108

30. Congdon NG, Foster PJ, Wamsley S, et al. Biometric gonioscopy and the effects of age, race, and sex on the anterior chamber angle. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86 (1): 18–22. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.1.18

31. Leung CK, Palmiero PM, Weinreb RN, et al. Comparisons of anterior segment biometry between Chinese and Caucasians using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94 (9): 1184–9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.167296

32. Friedman DS, Gazzard G, Min CB, et al. Age and sex variation in angle findings among normal Chinese subjects: a comparison of UBM, Scheimpflug, and gonioscopic assessment of the anterior chamber angle. J Glaucoma. 2008; 17 (1): 5–10. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31806ab327

33. Neroev V.V., Zakharova E.K., Kiseleva O.A., Robustova O.V., Bessmertny A.M. Some ethnic features of the anatomical and topographic parameters of eye structures with glaucoma in indigenous residents of Sakha Republik. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2013; 2: 52–7 (In Russ.).

34. Devereux JG, Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, et al. Anterior chamber depth measurement as a screening tool for primary angle-closure glaucoma in an East Asian population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118 (2): 257–63. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.2.257

35. Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84 (2): 186–92. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.2.186

36. Khor CC, Do T, Jia H, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for primary angle closure glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2016; 48 (5): 556–62. doi: 10.1038/ng.3540

37. Zeng K, Zhong B, Fang M, Shen XL, Huang LN. Common polymorphisms of the hOGG1, APE1 and XRCC1 genes correlate with the susceptibility and clinicopathological features of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Biosci Rep. 2017; 37 (3). doi: 10.1042/BSR20160644

38. Zhuang W, Wang S, Hao J, et al. Genotype-ocular biometry correlation analysis of eight primary angle closure glaucoma susceptibility loci in a cohort from Northern China. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (11): e0206935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206935


Review

For citations:


Neroev V.V., Malishevskaya T.N., Petrov S.Yu., Kosakyan S.M., Zakharova E.K. Epidemiology of primary angle-closure glaucoma in the Russian Federation. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2025;18(1):7-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2025-18-1-7-16

Views: 267


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0076 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5760 (Online)