An algorithm for managing surgical patients with acute retinal necrosis
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-4-29-35
Abstract
Purpose. To increase the efficiency of surgical treatment and develop an algorithm for managing patients with the consequences of acute retinal necrosis (ARN).
Material and methods. The study included 35 patients (42 eyes) aged 18 to 74 with acute retinal necrosis. All patients underwent a microinvasive (23 Ga) vitrectomy with membrane peel, endolaser coagulation of the retina and endotamponade of the vitreal cavity with silicone oil. The operated eyes were divided into 2 groups. The main group consisted of 17 eyes with a clinical picture of fibrosis of the vitreous without retinal detachment (10 eyes) and retinal detachment without pronounced fibrosis of the vitreous (7 eyes). The comparison group included 25 eyes which had retinal detachment and fibrosis of the vitreous at the time of surgery. The visual acuity varied between incorrect light projection and 0.15 with correction.
Results. A stable anatomical and optical result was achieved in all cases. Complete adhesion of the detached retina was achieved in 94.1 %, which is explained by the fact that surgical treatment was in most cases performed in the absence of pronounced stages of proliferative vitreoretinopaty. In all cases of the main group, an increase in visual acuity was noted. In 53 % of cases, visual acuity achieved 0.1 to 0.3 and in the remaining 47 % it was 0.3 % or above. This can be accounted for by the prevalence of peripheral necrotic lesions, as well as a lower incidence of macular edema and optic neuropathy. However, in the comparison group, an increase in visual acuity was only observed in 56 % cases, with visual acuity reaching 0.1 or higher only in 24 % of the eyes. A high frequency (72 %) of necrosis expansion to the posterior eye pole with an irreversible damage to the optic nerve and the macular region was revealed.
Conclusion. Active dynamic observation of patients with ARN helps detect changes requiring surgical treatment, which leads to higher functional and anatomical outcomes, as well helps avoid the disability of the patients. Surgical treatment prior to the formation of retinal detachment in severe traction syndrome with or without retinal tears is advisable. An algorithm was proposed for managing surgical patients, depending on the clinical manifestations of ARN effects.
About the Authors
V. V. NeroevRussian Federation
Corresponding member of RAS, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, director
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062, Russia
P. A. Ilyukhin
Russian Federation
Cand. Med. Sci., research associate, department of pathology of the retina and optic nerve
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062, Russia
V. E. Tankovsky
Russian Federation
Dr. Med. Sci., senior researcher, department of pathology of the retina and optic nerve, associate professor, continuous medical education chair
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062, Russia
R. A. Fedotov
Russian Federation
PhD student, department of pathology of the retina and optic nerve, ophthalmologist
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062, Russia
References
1. Holland G.N. Standard diagnostic criteria for the acute retinal necrosis syndrome. Executive Committee of the American Uveitis Society. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1994; 117: 663–7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70075-3
2. Кацнельсон Л.А., Танковский В.Э. Увеиты (клиника, лечение). Москва: 4-й филиал Воениздата; 2003. Katsnelson L.A., Tankovsky V.E. Uveites (clinics, therapy). Moscow: 4th filial Voenizdata; 2003 (in Russian).
3. Hillenkamp J., Nolle B., Bruns C., et al. Acute retinal necrosis: clinical features, early vitrectomy, and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1971–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.029
4. Lau C.H., Missotten T., Salzmann J., Lightman S.L. Acute retinal necrosis features, management, and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114: 756–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.037
5. Meghpara B., Sulkowski G., Kesen M.R., et al. Long-term follow-up of acute retinal necrosis. Retina. 2010; 30: 795–800. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c7013c
6. Wong R.W., Jumper J.M., McDonald H.R., et al. Emerging concepts in the management of acute retinal necrosis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2013; 97: 545–52. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-301983rep
7. Palay D.A., Sternberg Jr.P., Davis J., et al. Decrease in the risk of bilateral acute retinal necrosis by acyclovir therapy. Am. J.Ophthalmol. 1991; 112: 250–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)76725-X
8. Neroev V., Tankovskiy V., Krichevskaia G. Serological evaluation of the immune status of patients with acute retinal necrosis. In: Proc. of 9th International Symposium on Uveitis. Dublin; 2016: 81–2.
9. Hillenkamp J., Nolle B., Bruns C., et al. Acute retinal necrosis: clinical features, early vitrectomy, and outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1971–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.029
10. Shantha J.G., Weissman H.M., Debiec M.R., Albini T.A., Yeh S. Advances in the management of acute retinal necros is. Int. Ophthalmol. Clin. 2015; 55 (3): 1–13. doi: 10.1097/IIO.0000000000000077
11. Berker N., Ozdal P., Batman C., Soykan E. Prophylactic vitrectomy in acute retinal necrosis syndrome. Eye (Lond). 2007; 21: 104–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702410
12. Ishida T., Sugamoto Y., Sugita S., Mochizuki M. Prophylactic vitrectomy for acute retinal necrosis. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 53: 486–9. doi: 10.1007/s10384-009-0698-z
13. Luo Y.H., Duan X.C., Chen B.H., Tang L.S., Guo X.J. Efficacy and necessity of prophylactic vitrectomy for acute retinal necrosis syndrome. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2012; 5 (4): 482–7. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.04.15
14. Matsuo T. Timing of Prophylactic and early vitrectomy for firstpresenting or recurrent acute retinal necrosis syndrome. Acta Med. Okayama. 2012; 66 (6): 493–7. doi: 10.18926/AMO/49046
15. Navarro-Navarro A., Martinez-Toldos J.J., Tarazona-Jaimes C.P., Fernandez-Martinez C., Baeza-Diaz M.V. Presumed bilateral acute retinal necrosis 11 years apart, atypical presentation, and early vitrectomy. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul 30; 25 (5): e81–3. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000596
16. Schoenberger S.D., Kim S.J., Thorne J.E., Mruthyunjaya P. Diagnosis and treatment of acute retinal necrosis: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124 (3 Mar.): 382–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.11.007
17. Cochrane T.F., Silvestri G., McDowell C., et al. Acute retinal necrosis in the United Kingdom: results of a prospective surveillance study. Eye (Lond). 2012; 26: 370–7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.338
18. Holland G.N., Buhles W.C. Jr, Mastre B., Kaplan H.J. A controlled retrospective study of ganciclovir treatment for cytomegalovirus retinopathy. Use of a standardized system for the assessment of disease outcome. UCLA CMV Retinopathy. Study Group. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1989; 107 (12 Dec.): 1759–66. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020841024
19. Нероев В.В., Илюхин П.А, Федотов Р.А., Танковский В.Э. Результаты хирургического лечения острого некроза сетчатки. Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2018; 11 (1): 5–11. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-1-5-11 Neroev V.V., Ilyukhin P.A., Fedotov R.A., Tankovsky V.E. Results of surgical treatment of acute retinal necrosis. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2018; 11 (1): 5–11 (in Russian). doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-1-5-11
Review
For citations:
Neroev V.V., Ilyukhin P.A., Tankovsky V.E., Fedotov R.A. An algorithm for managing surgical patients with acute retinal necrosis. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2018;11(4):29-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-4-29-35