Quantitative assessment of foveal vascular bed
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2026-19-3-88-92
Abstract
Purpose of the study — to determine the causes of significant differences in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) quantitative metrics in the central zone and the inner ring of the ETDRS grid and to develop methods for their correcting.
Material and methods. Manuals for the most common OCTA devices of various manufacturers Carl Zeiss Meditec (USA), Optovue (USA), Topcon Corp. (Japan), Optopol Technology (Poland), Huvitz Co. (South Korea) were studied. OCTA data of 57 people (57 eyes) over 18 years old with refraction close to emmetropia were analyzed. OCTA examinations were performed on a Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 device (Carl Zeiss Meditec, USA). The perfusion density, vessel density and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area of the superficial capillary plexus were determined. OCTA images of the macula were acquired using the 6 × 6 mm scan.
Results. It was found that in most devices, including Cirrus HD OCT, the calculation of indicators in the central zone of the ETDRS scheme d = 1 mm is performed by dividing by the entire area of the central zone without taking into account the area of the FAZ. As a result, the quantitative metrics of the central zone are significantly underestimated. A correction formula has been proposed to calculate OCTA parameters adjusted for the size of the FAZ. It has been shown that the correction increases the quantitative metrics of the superficial capillary plexus in the central zone of the ETDRS grid by about 1,5 times, approaching their values to the indicators in the inner ring of the ETDRS grid.
Conclusion. Correcting the values to account for the FAZ area provides more accurate characterization of the quantitative OCTA indicators in the central zone.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. A. ShpakRussian Federation
Aleksander A. Shpak — Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, head of the department of clinical and functional diagnostics.
59 а, Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, 127486
N. A. Morina
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Morina — Cand. of Med. Sci., junior researcher of the department of clinical and functional diagnostics.
59 а, Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, 127486
References
1. Bontzos G, Kabanarou SA, Gkizis I, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration, macular circulation and morphology of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic patients: quantitative cross-sectional study using OCT-A. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021; 99 (7): e1135–e1140. doi: 10.1111/aos.14754
2. Neroev V.V., Okhotsimskaya T.D., Fadeeva V.A. An account of retinal microvascular changes in diabetes acquired by OCT angiography. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2017; 10 (2): 40–5 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-2-40-45
3. Petrachkov D.V., Budzinskaya M.V. Biomarkers of diabetic retinopathy on optical coherence tomography angiography. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2020; 136 (4): 344–53 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2020136042344
4. Stulova A.N., Semenova N.S., Zheleznyakova A.V., Akopyan V.S., Lipatov D.S. OCT-Angiography in detecting preclinical diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2022; 19 (2): 391–8 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2022-2-391-398
5. Courtie E, Kirkpatrick JRM, Taylor M, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024; 14 (1): 9643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54306-3
6. Liu G, Wang F. Macular vascular changes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus by optical coherence tomography angiography. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21 (1): 170. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01927-1
7. CIRRUS HD-OCT User Manual – Models 500, 5000. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., 2016.
8. Yoon J, Kang HJ, Lee JY, et al. Associations between the macular microvasculatures and subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: An Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9: 843176. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.843176
9. Somilleda-Ventura Selma A., Razo-Blanco-Hernández et al. Circularity of the foveal avascular zone and its correlation with parafoveal vessel density, in subjects with and without diabetes. Cirugía y cirujanos. 2019; 87 (4): 390–5. doi: 10.24875/ciru.18000638
10. Samara WA, Say EA, Khoo CT, et al. Сorrelation of foveal avascular zone size with foveal morphology in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 2015; 35 (11): 2188–95. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000847
11. Шпак А.А., Морина Н.А., Письменская В.А. Площадь фовеальной аваскулярной зоны при аномалиях рефракции. Вестник офтальмологии. 2022; 138 (6): 26–31. [Shpak A.A., Morina N.A., Pismenskaya V.A. Area of the foveal avascular zone in patients with refractive errors. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2022; 138 (6): 26–31 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma202213806126
12. Pang Y, Zhang G, Zhang H, et al. Foveal avascular zone in normal human eyes by optical coherence tomography angiography. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy. 2023; 42: 103303. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103303
13. SOLIX User Manual. Optovue, Inc., 2020.
14. Lommatzsch C, Rothaus K, Koch JM, et al. OCTA vessel density changes in the macular zone in glaucomatous eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 256 (8): 1499–508. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3965-1
Review
For citations:
Shpak A.A., Morina N.A. Quantitative assessment of foveal vascular bed. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2026;19(3):88-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2026-19-3-88-92
JATS XML

























