Preview

Russian Ophthalmological Journal

Advanced search

Clinical forms of allergic eye manifestations: prospects of therapy

https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-94-101

Abstract

The review presents the main clinical forms of eye allergy. The modern classification of conjunctival allergic diseases (CAD) divides them into several types according to the presence or absence of proliferative changes complicated by atopic dermatitis or mechanical artifactual irritation. These include: 1) allergic conjunctivitis (AC) without proliferative changes, including seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and chronic allergic conjunctivitis, in which the symptoms persist the whole year; 2) atopic keratoconjunctivitis, a chronic allergic conjunctival disease affecting patients with atopic dermatitis, 3) spring keratoconjunctivitis with conjunctival and proliferative changes — papillary conjunctival hyperplasia with the involvement of the cornea (superficial punctate keratitis, erosion, persistent epithelial defect, sterile corneal ulceration), 4) giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) accompanied by proliferative changes in the upper lid and the arch of the conjunctiva of the eyeball, caused by mechanical irritation factors (contact lenses, eye prostheses, or surgical sutures). To treat these conditions, the following groups of medications are used: artificial tears; topical antihistamine drugs; mast cell membrane stabilizers; dualaction drugs, preferably without preservatives, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory medications and vasoconstrictors having side effects. Olopatadin 1 mg/1 ml, preservative free (Olofadin -ECO), has certain advantages due to the fact that it combines antihistamine and membrane stabilizing action. Due to the presence of an antihistamine component in the composition, an acute reaction is stopped, while the effect of the drug is accumulated due to the presence of a membrane-stabilizing component. It is safe for long-term therapy.

About the Authors

M. A. Kovalevskaya
Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University
Russian Federation

Maria A. Kovalevskaya - Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, head of chair of ophthalmology

10, Studencheskaya St., Voronezh, 394036



L. A. Filina
Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University
Russian Federation

Lilia A. Filina - Cand. of Med. Sci., assistant professor, chair of ophthalmology

10, Studencheskaya St., Voronezh, 394036



References

1. Kovalevskaya M.A., Maychuk D.Yu., Brzhevsky V.V., Maychuk Yu. F., Okolov I.N. Red Eye Syndrome: In: Maychuk D.Yu., ed. Practical guide for ophthalmologists. Moscow; 2010 (In Russian)

2. Abelson M.B., Shetty S., Korchak M., Butrus S.I., Smith L.M. Advances in pharmacotherapy for allergic conjunctivitis. Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2015; 16 (8): 1219–31. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1040760

3. Bonini S., Gramiccioni C., Bonini M., Bresciani M. Practical approach to diagnosis and treatment of ocular allergy: a 1-year systematic review. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology. 2007; 7 (5): 446–9. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3282ef868b

4. Solomon A. Allergic manifestations of contact lens wearing. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology. 2016; 16 (5): 492–7. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000311

5. Arshad J.I., Saud A., White D.E., Afshari N.A., Sayegh R.R. Chronic conjunctivitis from a retained contact lens. Eye & contact lens. 2020 Jan; 46 (1): e1-e4. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000587

6. Doğan Ü., Ağca S. Investigation of possible risk factors in the development of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2018; 11 (9): 1508–13. doi:10.18240/ijo.2018.09.13

7. Nazirova Z.R. The role of the local inflammatory process and immune response in allergic diseases of the eyes in children. Medical News. 2017; 2: 82–4 (in Russian)

8. Esposito S., Fior G., Mori A., Osnaghi S., Ghiglioni D. An update on the therapeutic approach to vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Paediatr. Drugs. 2016 Oct; 18 (5): 347–55. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0185-1

9. Wilson D.J., Schutte S.M., Abel S.R. Comparing the efficacy of ophthalmic NSAIDs in common indications: a literature review to support cost-effective prescribing. Ann. Pharmacother. 2015 Jun; 49 (6): 727–34. doi: 10.1177/1060028015574593

10. Maychuk D.Yu., Loshkareva A.O., Aperyan N.V. Features of the clinical course and complex therapy of spring catarrh (clinical case). Oftal’mokhirurgija. 2017; 4: 79–83 (in Russian)

11. Nebbioso M., Alisi L., Giovannetti F., Armentano M, Lambiase A. Eye drop emulsion containing 0.1 % cyclosporin (1 mg/mL) for the treatment of severe vernal keratoconjunctivitis: an evidence-based review and place in therapy. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2019; 13: 1147–55. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S181811

12. Miyazaki D, Fukushima A, Ohashi Y, et al. Steroid-sparing effect of 0.1 % tacrolimus eye drop for treatment of shield ulcer and corneal epitheliopathy in refractory allergic ocular diseases. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124 (3): 287–94.

13. Kaçmaz R.O., Kempen J.H., Newcomb C., et al. Cyclosporine for ocular inflammatory diseases. Ophthalmology. 2010 Mar; 117 (3): 576–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.010

14. Veselovskaya Z.F., Veselovskaya N.N. New approaches in the pharmacotherapy of allergic eye diseases. Ophthalmology. 2015; 1: 18–26 (in Russian)

15. Skripnik R.L. On the question of the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. Eastern Europe. 2015; 1: 100–10 (in Russian)

16. Maychuk D.Yu. Modern possibilities of therapeutic treatment of allergic conjunctivitis. Overview. Ophthalmology. 2014; 2: 19–26 (in Russian)

17. Bakunina N.A. A clinical experience of atopic keratoconjunctivitis treatment. Ophthalmology journal. 2014; 7 (2): 78–82.

18. Maychuk Yu.F., Lortkipanidze M.M., Pozdnyakova V.V., Pozdnyakov V.I. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis: severe forms of corneal pathology. Refractive surgery and ophthalmology. 2007; 7 (1): 53–7 (in Russian)

19. Maychuk Yu.F., Pozdnyakov V.I., Lortkipanidze M.M., Pozdnyakova V.V. Clinical forms of corneal pathology in atopic keratoconjunctivitis. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2007; 5: 44–7 (in Russian)

20. Maychuk Yu.F., Pozdnyakov V.I., Lortkipanidze M.M., Pozdnyakova V.V. Eye lesions in patients with atopic dermatitis. Allergology and Immunology. 2006; 7 (3): 424 (in Russian)

21. Maychuk Yu.F. Conjunctivitis. Modern drug therapy. A short guide for doctors. Moscow; 2013 (in Russian)

22. Egorov A.E., Zakharova M.A. Treatment of a patient with allergic conjunctivitis: recommendations to an ophthalmologist for outpatient care. RMZH. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologija. 2017; 17: 111–4 (in Russian)

23. Prozornaya L.P., Brzhesky V.V. The effectiveness of the drug “Oftalmoferon” in the treatment of chronic blepharoconjunctivitis in children. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2017; 133 (5): 49–55 (in Russian)

24. Rosenwasser L.J., O'Brien T., Weyne J. Mast cell stabilization and antihistamine effects of olopatadine ophthalmic solution: a review of preclinical and clinical research. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2005 Sep; 21 (9): 1377–87. doi:10.1185/030079905X56547

25. Mahvan T.D., Buckley W.A., Hornecker J.R. Alcaftadine for the prevention of itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis. Ann. Pharmacother. 2012 Jul-Aug; 46 (7–8): 1025–32. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q755

26. Castillo M., Scott N.W., Mustafa M.Z., Mustafa M.S., Azuara Blanco A. Topical antihistamines and mast cell stabilisers for treating seasonal and perennial allergic conjunctivitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 6:CD009566. Available at: https://www.cochrane.org/CD009566/EYES_topical-antihistamines-andmast-cell-stabilisers-for-treating-seasonal-and-perennial-allergicconjunctivitis

27. Tagawa Y., Namba K., Nakazono Y., Iwata D., Ishida S. Evaluating the efficacy of epinastine ophthalmic solution using a conjunctivitis allergen challenge model in patients with birch pollen allergic conjunctivitis. Allergol. Int. 2017 Apr; 66 (2): 338–43. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.08.011

28. Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V., Sakhnov S.N., Bukina A.V. Clinical experience of using 0.2 % olopatadin in the allergic conjunctivitis treatment. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2019; 16 (3): 378–385 (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-50952019-3-378-385

29. Gane J., Buckley R. Leukotriene receptor antagonists in allergic eye disease: a systematic review and meta analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2013 Jan; 1 (1): 65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2012.07.001

30. Sheppard J.D., Comstock T.L., Cavet M.E. Impact of the topical ophthalmic corticosteroid loteprednol etabonate on intraocular pressure. Adv. Ther. 2016 Apr; 33 (4): 532–52. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0315-8

31. Wu L.Q., Chen X., Lou H., Cheng J.W., Wei R.L. Loteprednol etabonate in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis: a meta analysis. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2015 Aug; 31 (8): 1509–18. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1058250

32. Baroody F.M., Shenaq D., DeTineo M., Wang J., Naclerio R.M. Fluticasone furoate nasal spray reduces the nasal-ocular reflex: a mechanism for the efficacy of topical steroids in controlling allergic eye symptoms. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009 Jun; 123 (6): 1342–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.015

33. Roberts G., Pfaar O., Akdis C.A., et al. Guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Allergy. 2018 Apr; 73 (4): 765–98. doi: 10.1111/all.13317


Review

For citations:


Kovalevskaya M.A., Filina L.A. Clinical forms of allergic eye manifestations: prospects of therapy. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(1):94-101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-94-101

Views: 1756


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0076 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5760 (Online)