A regional register of patients with glaucoma. Methodological aspects of creation and use in clinical practice
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-4-supplement-7-35
Abstract
Literature data have shown the shortcomings of current domestic and foreign registers of glaucoma patients: none of them provides adequate monitoring and prognostication of the disease. The study presents the main tasks, principles and methodological foundations of building a regional glaucoma register — an automated system for collecting, storing and processing information on glaucoma patients living in the Tyumen region. Requirements for organizational, informational, software and technical support of the register are given. The stages of register development are described in detail, including the issues identified during the use of the database and the ways to solve them. The work highlights the steps already taken to develop and implement a regional glaucoma register and discusses the prospects for further development of this area in health care management, aimed at improving the quality of medical care. The data will help clinicians in the development of similar databases in other regions of Russia, as they highlight the difficulties that may occur. The possibilities of solving other topical research issues, in particular the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy of disease progression, are discussed. The regional glaucoma register can serve as a tool for providing high-quality diagnostics, treatment and observation of patients with glaucoma and a possible model of the future National Register across Russia.
About the Authors
T. N. Malishevskaya
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dr. of Med. Sci., head of the department of analytics
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062, Russia
S. M. Kosakyan
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. of Med. Sci., ophthalmologist, glaucoma department
14/19, Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062, Russia
D. B. Egorov
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
senior professor of chair of medical informatics and biophysics with UNESCO net section of bioethics
54, Odesskaya St., Tyumen, 625023, Russia
L. A. Protopopov
Regional Ophthalmologic Clinic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
cand. of Med. Sci., acting chief physician
118/1, Kholodilnaya St., Tyumen, 625048, Russia
S. V. Shatskikh
Regional Ophthalmologic Clinic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cand. of Med. Sci., head of the out-patient glaucoma department
118/1, Kholodilnaya St., Tyumen, 625048, Russia
I. V. Nemtsova
Regional Ophthalmologic Clinic;
West Siberian Institute of postgraduate medical education
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist; assistant professor, chair of ophthalmology and optometry
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist; assistant professor, chair of ophthalmology and optometry
118/1, Kholodilnaya St., Tyumen, 625048, Russia
5/11, Prokopiya Artamonova St., Tyumen, 625051, Russia
A. S. Vlasova
Regional Ophthalmologic Clinic;
West Siberian Institute of postgraduate medical education
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist of out-patient glaucoma department; assistant professor, chair of ophthalmology and optometr
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist of out-patient glaucoma department; assistant professor, chair of ophthalmology and optometr
118/1, Kholodilnaya St., Tyumen, 625048, Russia
5/11, Prokopiya Artamonova St., Tyumen, 625051, Russia
Yu. E. Filippova
Regional Ophthalmologic Clinic;
West Siberian Institute of postgraduate medical education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist of out-patient glaucoma department; assistant professor, chair of ophthalmology and optometry
118/1, Kholodilnaya St., Tyumen, 625048, Russia
5/11, Prokopiya Artamonova St., Tyumen, 625051, Russia
E. E. Farikova
First Pavlov St. Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD student, chair of ophthalmology and clinics
6-8, L'va Tolstogo St., St. Petersburg, 197022, Russia
References
1. Neroev V.V. Questions of organization of ophthalmological care to the population of the Russian Federation. Moscow: April, 2018 (In Russian).
2. Total incidence of adult population in Russia in 2018: Statistical data. Part IV. Moscow, 2019 (In Russian). Available at: https://www.rosminzdrav.ru/ministry/61/22/stranitsa-979/statisticheskie-i-informatsionnye-materialy/statisticheskiy-sbornik-2018-god
3. Bedoreva I.Yu., Fomichev N.G., Sadovoy M.A., Samarina V.Yu. Quality management system for specialized care for patients with spinal injury based on the principles of ISO 9000 series. Spine surgery. 2004; 3: 89–96 (In Russian).
4. Bedoreva I.Yu., Fomichev N.G., Sadovoy M.A., Samarina V.Yu. the Role of the principles of universal quality management in the management of a Federal healthcare institution. Spine surgery. 2006; 4: 75–83 (In Russian).
5. Healthcare Service Guide to ISO 9001:2000. Gerasimova G., ed. Moscow: Standards and quality. 2005: 4–40 (In Russian).
6. International standard ISO 9001. Quality management systems. Requirements. 2000: 4–20.
7. Levinson U.A. Quality treatment: ISO 9001 standard against medical errors. ISO 9000-14000. 2006; 5: 11–3 (In Russian).
8. Ushakov I.V., Knyazyuk N.F., Kitsul I.S. Content analysis of approaches to quality management of medical care in modern conditions. Management in healthcare. 2006; 2: 27–35 (In Russian).
9. Emanuel Yu.V., Khotin A.L. Application of the quality management system in healthcare organizations. Clinical and laboratory consultation. 2009; 2: 4–12 (In Russian).
10. Majumdar S.R., McAlister F.A., Furberg C.D. From knowledge to practice in chronic cardiovascular disease: a long and winding road. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2004; 3 (10): 1738–42.
11. Lindenbraten A.L., Аvksentieva M.V., Golovina S.M. Quality management of medical care: world experience. Quality management in health and social development. 2011; 3: 118–26 (In Russian).
12. Emanuel Yu.V., Khotin A.L. Features of development and implementation of the quality management system in healthcare organizations. Clinical and laboratory consultation. 2009; 3: 22–30 (In Russian).
13. Freixinet J.L., Varela G., Molins L., et al. Benchmarking in thoracic surgery. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2016; 52 (4 Apr.): 204–10. doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2015.09.014
14. Mikhailova E.A. Basics of benchmarking: evolution of quality concepts. Management in Russia and abroad. 2001; 2. Available at: http:/www.cfin.ru/press/management/2001/2/mihaylova.shtml (In Russian).
15. Gliklich R., Dreyer N., Leavy M. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A user’s guide. Third edition. Two volumes (Prepared by the Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc., a Quintiles company] under Contract No. 290 2005 00351 TO7). AHRQ Publication No. 13 (14)-EHC111. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2014. Available at: http:/www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/registriesguide-3.cfm
16. Vishneva E.A., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Antonova E.V., et al. Universal information structure as a tool for long-term dynamic monitoring in allergology. Pediatric pharmacology. 2014; 11 (5): 65–70 (In Russian).
17. Dedov I.I., Tulpakov A.N. Personalized medicine: current state and prospects. Vestnik RAMS. 2012; 12: 4–12 (In Russian).
18. Dolgova I. G. the Role of PP in the formation of an organizational and functional system for providing ophthalmological care in the region. Ural medical journal 2014; 3: 81–8 (In Russian).
19. Strom B.L., Kimmel S.E., Hennessy S. Pharmacoepidemiology 5th ed. John Wiley Sons, Ltd. 2012. doi:10.1002/9781119959946
20. Glushkov V.M., Branovitskiy V.I., Dovgallo A.M. Introduction to ASU. Ed. 2. Kiev; 1974 (In Russian).
21. Information technology. A set of standards for automated systems. Technical specification for creating an automated system. GOST 24, 34. Available at: http:/www.internet-law.ru/law/gosts/34-602-89.htm (In Russian).
22. Tsaregorodtsev A.D., Baleva L.S., Kobrinsky B.A. Computer systems for analysis of infant and perinatal mortality. Nizhny Novgorod medical journal. PFD. 2002. Special issue; 1: 25–7 (In Russian).
23. Turkina A.G., Novitskaya A.V., Golenkov A.K., et al. Register of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the Russian Federation: from an observational study to evaluating the effectiveness of therapy in clinical practice. Clinical Oncohematology. 2017; 10 (3): 390–401 (In Russian).
24. Kobrinsky B.A. Automated registers of medical appointment: theory and practice of their application. Mоscow: ID "Health Manager"; 2011. (In Russian).
25. Gliklich R.E. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes. A User’s Guide; 2010.
26. Yagudina R.I., Litvinenko M.M., Sorokovikov I.V. Patient registers: structure, functions, use possibilities. Pharmaeconomika. 211; 4 (4): 3–7 (In Russian).
27. Kobrinsky B.A. Unified concept of building personal electronic medical records, information systems of different levels and specialized registers. Doctor and information technologies. 2011; 3: 15–21 (In Russian).
28. Yagudina R.I., Koroleva N.I. Patient Registers and all that is known about them today (part 1). Modern organization of drug provision. 2015; 1 (2): 41–7 (In Russian).
29. Yagudina R.I., Litvinenko M.M., Sorokovikov I.V. Patient Registers: structure of function, possibilities of use. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011; 4 (4): 3–17 (In Russian).
30. Dolgova I.G., Malishevskaya O.I., Knysh O.I., Malishevskaya T.N. Choosing glaucoma treatment strategy based on pharmacoeconomical research. Medical science and education of the Urals. 2011; 12 (2): 146–8 (In Russian).
31. Dolgova I.G.,Malishevskaya O.I., Knysh O.I., Malishevskaya T.N. Marketing research of drug provision for glaucoma patients in the Tyumen region. Pharmacy. 2015; 2: 29–32 (In Russian).
32. How registries can help performance measurement improve care. White Paper 2010. The Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at Brookings. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/65448.pdf
33. Gridnev V.I., Oschepkova E.V., Kiselev A.R., еt al. Methodological aspects of registers of cardiovascular diseases. Cardiological Bulletin. 2012; 7 (19): 5–10 (In Russian).
34. Gitt A.K., Bueno H., Danchin N., et al. The role of cardiac registries in evidencebased medicine. Eur. Heart J. 2010 Mar; 31 (5): 525–9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp596
35. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. doi: 10.17226/10027
36. Pryor D., Califf R., Harrell F., et al. Clinical Databases: accomplishments and unrealized potential. Med. Care. 1985; 23 (5): 623–47.
37. Fonarow G.C., Yancy C.W., Heywood J.T., et al. Adherence to heart failure quality-of-care indicators in US hospitals: analysis of the ADHERE Registry. Arch. Intern. Med. 2005; 165: 1469–77.
38. Britton A., McKee M., Black N., et al. Choosing between randomised and nonrandomised studies: a systematic review. Health Technol. Assess. 1998; 2 (13): 1–124.
39. Avdeev R.V., Esaulenko I.E., Antonenkov Yu.E. Register of patients with glaucoma as a way to improve their drug supply to reduce the incidence. Bulletin of Volgograd state University. 2015; 3 (55): 641–4 (In Russian).
40. Ryabtseva A.A., Grishina E.E., Andriukhina O.M., et al. The first experience of creating registers of patients with eye diseases in the Moscow region. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2019; 16 (2): 271–6 (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2019-2-271-276
41. Dolgova I.G., Malishevskaya T.N., Shatskikh S.V., Vlasova A.S., Zhilyaeva O.K. Experience in implementing the Register of glaucoma patients". National journal of glaucoma. 2015; 14 (32): 32–7 (In Russian).
42. Dolgova I.G., Malishevskaya T.N., Sannikov A.G., et al. Personalized accounting of socially significant ophthalmological diseases. Medical information systems. 2014; 2: 32–40 (In Russian).
43. Elfimov D.A., Elfimova I.V., Dolgova I.G., et al. Application of information technologies in practical health care. Medical science and education of the Urals. 2019; 1: 129–32 (In Russian).
44. Gusev A.F., Bedoreva I.Yu., Khafizova E.R. Development of the process-based management system for scientific investigations in a medical research institution. Khirurgia Pozvonochnika (Spine Surgery). 2010; (4): 90–7 (In Russian).
45. Merkov A.M., Polyakov L.Ye. Health statistics (manual for physicians). Moscow: Meditsina; 1974 (In Russian).
46. Metzger J. Using computerized registries in chronic disease care. Oakland, Calif: California Healthcare Foundation, 2004.
47. Hill R.D. Community care service for diabetics in the Poole area. Br. Med. J. 1976; 1 (6018): 1137–9.
48. Proctor S.J., Taylor P.R. A practical guide to continuous population-based data collection (PACE): a process facilitating uniformity of care and research into practice QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. February 2000; 93 (2): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/93.2.67
49. Ferguson T.B., Peterson E.D., Coombs L.P., et al. Use of continuous quality improvement to increase use of process measures in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2003; 290: 49–56.
50. Schmittdiel J., Bodenheimer T., Solomon N.A., et al. Brief report: the prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations: a national survey. J. Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20 (9): 855–8.
51. Stroebel R.J., Scheitel S.M., Fitz J.S., et al. A randomized trial of three diabetes registry implementation strategies in a community internal medicine practice. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Improv. 2002 Aug; 28 (8): 441–50. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28044-x
52. Karter A.J., Parker M.M., Moffet H.H., et al. Missed appointments and poor glycemic control. Med. Care. 2004; 42: 110–5.
53. Grant R.W., Hamrick H.E., Sullivan C.M., et al. Impact of population management with direct physician feedback on care of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 2275–80.
54. Harris M.F., Priddin D., Ruscoe W., et al. Quality of care provided by general practitioners using or not using Division-based diabetes registers. Med. J. Aust. 2002; 177: 250–2.
55. Charlton B.G., Taylor P.R., Proctor S.J. The PACE (population-adjusted clinical epidemiology) strategy: a new approach to multicentered clinical research. Quarterly J. Med. 1997; 90: 147–51.
56. Information technology. Set of standards for automated systems. Technical directions for developing of automated system. GOST 24, 34 (In Russian). Available at: htttp://www.internet-law.ru/law/gosts/34-602-89.htm
57. Dolgova I.G., Malishevskaya T.N., Sannikov A.G., Egorov D.B. Certificate of state registration of a computer program No. 2011618588 Automated information system “Register of patients with glaucoma of the Tyumen region” (in Russian).
58. Bushmanov A.Yu., Tukov A.R., Noskov D.S. Automated control systems: the branch register of people, which have the occupational diseases. Social aspects of public health. 2012; 5 (27): 10 (in Russian).
59. Kiselev A.R., Gridnev V.I., Posnenkova O.M., Popova Yu.V. Disease registers in healthcare management system. Health Care Standardization Problems. 2013; 1–2: 15–8 (in Russian).
60. Graber M. SQL. [Transl. from Eng]. Moscow: Lori; 2003 (in Russian).
61. Mark D.A., McGowan K. Methodology of structural analysis and design. [Transl. from Eng]. Moscow: Meta Technology; 2003 (In Russian).
62. Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0). Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. 1993. Available at: http://www.idef.com/pdf/idef0.pdf
63. Gridnev V.I., Oschepkova E.V., Kiselev A.R., et al. Methodological aspects of the Register of cardiovascular diseases. Kardiologicheskij vestnik. 2012; issue 2; 7 (19): 5–10 (In Russian).
64. Barbara A.M., Loeb M., Dolovich L., et al. Patient self-report and medical records: measuring agreement for binary data. Can. Fam. Physician. 2011; 57: 737–8.
65. Radford M.J., Heidenreich P.A., Bailey S.R., et al. ACC/AHA 2007 methodology for the development of clinical data standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology. American heart association task force on clinical data standards. J. Am. Call. Cardiol. 2007; 49: 830–7.
66. Borri H. Firebird: database developer's guide. Sankt-Petersburg: BHV-Petersburg; 2006 (In Russian).
67. Boytsov S.A., Dovgalevsky P.Ya., Oshchepkova E.V., et al. Comparative analysis of data from Russian and foreign registers of acute coronary syndrome. Cardiological Bulletin. 2010; 1: 82–6 (In Russian).
68. Erlikh A.D., Gratsianskiy N.A. Experience of organizing an independent Russian register of acute coronary syndromes. Questions of statistics. 2011; 4: 37–42 (In Russian).
69. Polygenis D., Frame D., Blanchette C., et al. ISPOR Taxonomy of patient registries: classification, characteristics and terms. NJ: Lawrenceville; 2013.
70. Khromushin V.A. Algorithms and analysis of medical data. Tutorial. Tula: Tul’sky Polygraphist; 2010 (In Russian).
71. Kristianson K.J., Ljunggren H., Gustafsson L.L. Data extraction from a semistructured electronic medical record system for outpatients: a model to facilitate the access and use of data for quality control and research. Health Informatics J. 2009; 15: 305–19.
72. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. Prepared by Outcome DEcIDE Center under Contract No. HHSA290200500351TO1. AHRQ Publication No. 07-EHC001-1.
73. Pryor D., Califf R., Harrell F., et al. Clinical Databases: accomplishments and unrealised potential. Med. Care 1985; 23 (5): 623–47.
74. Black N. Developing high quality clinical databases. The key to a new research paradigm. British Med. J. 1997; 315: 381–2.
75. Lindesay J. Recognition of cognitive impairment in elderly medical in-patients. J. R. Soc. Med. 1995; 88 (4): 183–4.
76. Damulin I.V. Pathogenetic, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of vascular cognitive impairment. Consilium medicum. 2006; 8: 80–5 (In Russian).
77. Naumova E.A., Schwartz Yu.G. Patient compliance with medical prescriptions: are interventions to improve this indicator effective? International Journal of Medical Practice. 2006; 1: 48 (In Russian).
78. Pereverzeva E.V., Moroz N.V., Razvodovsky Yu.E., et al. Impaired cognitive status in elderly and senile cardiological patients. Healthcare. 2015; 2: 14–7 (In Russian).
79. Putilov A.A., Verevkin E.G., Donskaya O.G., Putilov D.A. Morningevening preference as a three-level individual feature of the sleep-wake cycle. Bulletin of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2007; 5: 103–9 (In Russian).
80. Levandovski R., Sasso E., Hidalgo M.P. Chronotype: a review of the advances, limits and applicability of the main instruments used in the literature to assess human phenotype. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy. 2013; 35 (1): 3–11.
81. Egorov E.A., Astakhov Yu.S., Botabekova T.K., et al. International Guide to Glaucoma. Diagnostics and dynamic monitoring of patients with glaucoma. Minsk: Altiora — living colors; 2013, Vol. 1 (In Russian).
82. Burr J.M., Mowatt G., Hern ndez R., et al. The clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment. 2007; 11 (41): 1–190.
83. Akopyan V.S. Evaluation of the retinal ganglion cell complex in primary openangle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2011; 8 (1): 20–4 (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Malishevskaya T.N., Kosakyan S.M., Egorov D.B., Protopopov L.A., Shatskikh S.V., Nemtsova I.V., Vlasova A.S., Filippova Yu.E., Farikova E.E. A regional register of patients with glaucoma. Methodological aspects of creation and use in clinical practice. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(4):7-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-4-supplement-7-35
Views:
1534
Email this article 