Explantation of domestic models of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses in the development of subcapsular cataract in higly myopic patients: clinical features
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2021-14-1-61-64
Abstract
To date, the operation of choice in young patients with high myopia, is the implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (PIOL), provided that there are contraindications to keratorefractive interventions, However, in the late postoperative period, cataracts may occur, which requires the development of surgical tactics for lens explantation with simultaneous phacoemulsification of cataract (FEC) implementation.
The purpose is to develop and analyze a method for removing a PIOL through a 2 mm corneal incision in subcapsular cataract cases.
Material and methods. Posterior chamber domestic models of PIOL type RSK-1(3) and RSK-3 in 22 patients (37 eyes), implanted in the S.N. FEDOROV “EYE MICROSURGERY” clinic in 1994 – 2001 had to be removed due to the development of secondary cataracts. PIOL stayed in the eye 2 to 26 years (averagely 14.30 ± 1.30 yrs). In all cases, the P IOL was removed followed by FEC with implantation of a posterior chamber IOL. The optical power of the IOL was calculated mainly in such a way that the residual myopic refraction was 2.0–3.0 D.
Results. The intraoperative condition of the anterior chamber was stable, the volume of irrigation fluid consumed was within 90–120 ml. No complications were detected in the early and late postoperative periods. The results of dynamic ophthalmological follow up of patients showed that visual acuity without correction and with correction after surgery averaged 0.2 ± 0.1 and 0.60 ± 0.15, respectively.
Conclusion. The proposed method of explantation of domestic lenses of S.N. FEDOROV NMRC MNTK “EYE MICROSURGERY” shows that it enables a safe, simple removal of PIOL in the event of secondary subcapsular cataract, which allows achieving high clinical and functional results without overspending the irrigation solution.
About the Authors
G. V. Sorokoletov
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery NMRC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Grigory V. Sorokoletov — Cand. of Med. Sci., researcher, department of lens surgery and intraocular correction.
59a, Beskudnikovsky Bulvar, Moscow, 127486
E. R. Tumanyan
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery NMRC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Eleonora R. Tumanyan — Dr. of Med. Sci., head of the scientific and educational center.
59a, Beskudnikovsky Bulvar, Moscow, 127486
A. N. Bessarabov
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery NMRC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anatoly N. Bessarabov — Cand. of Tech. Sci., department of scientific and mathematical support.
59a, Beskudnikovsky Bulvar, Moscow, 127486
M. A. Soboleva
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery NMRC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria A. Soboleva — resident.
59a, Beskudnikovsky Bulvar, Moscow, 127486
References
1. Zuev V., Tumanyan E., Sorokoletov G., Fedorova A. The history of the FIOL development in the treatment of high myopia. Fyodorov journal of ophthalmic surgery. 2018; (4): 65–70 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2018-4-65-70
2. Konovalov M., Molokotin E. Clinical features of removing phakic intraocular lenses in cataract at high myopia. Oftal'mologiya. 2012; 9 (4): 31–5 (In Russian).
3. Alfonso J., Fernández-Vega-Cueto L., AlfonsoBartolozzi B., et al. Five-year follow-up of correction of myopia: posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central port design. J. Refract. Surg. 2019 Mar.; 35 (3): 169–76. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20190118-01
4. Kosenko T.G., Kosenko S.M., Klimova O.N. Analysis of the immediate and remote results of implantation of phakic IOL for correction of high myopia. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftalmologii 2015; (4): 60–3 (In Russian).
5. Sachdev G., Ramamurthy D. Long-term safety of posterior chamber implantable phakic contact lens for the correction of myopia. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2019; 13: 137-42. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S185304
6. Sanchez-Galeana C.A., Smith R.J., Sanders D.R., et al. Lens opacities after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110: 781–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01973-5
7. Boiko E.V., Samkovich E.V., Dzhusoev A.T., Radchenko A.G. Long-term results of implantation of posterior chamber phakic IOL in high degree myopia. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2018; (5): 112–6 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32000/2072-1757-2018-16-5-112-116
8. Kuznetsova V.I., Kuznetsov I.V. Eye condition after implantation of phacic posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PIOL) in the long- term period. Nauchnaya diskussiya: voprosy meditsiny. 2015; 10–11 (30): 85–8 (In Russian).
9. Kuznetsov I.V., Kuznetsova V.I. Endothelial microscopy of cornea after the implantation of posterior-chamber phacic intraocular lenses in the distant period. Tochka zreniya. Vostok — Zapad. 2016; (2): 49–51 (In Russian).
10. Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Yu., Batalina L.V. Phakic intraocular lenses for myopia correction. Tochka zreniya. Vostok — Zapad. 2018; (1): 67–9 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.25276/2410-1257-2018-1-67-69
11. Fedorov S.N., Zuev V.K., Aznabaev B.M. Intraocular correction of high-grade myopia with negative posterior chamber IOL. Oftal'mokhirurgiya. 1991; (3): 57–8 (In Russian).
12. Alfonso J.F., Baamonde B., Fernandez Vega L., et al. Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses to correct myopia: five-year follow-up. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2011 May; 37 (5): 873–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.040
13. Kamiya K., Shimizu K., Igarashi A. Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation: comparative, multicentre study in 351 eyes with low-to-moderate or high myopia. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb; 102 (2): 177–81. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310164
Review
For citations:
Sorokoletov G.V., Tumanyan E.R., Bessarabov A.N., Soboleva M.A. Explantation of domestic models of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses in the development of subcapsular cataract in higly myopic patients: clinical features. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2021;14(1):61-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2021-14-1-61-64
Views:
823
Email this article 