Preview

Russian Ophthalmological Journal

Advanced search

A comparative study of pharmacokinetics of recombinant prourokinasein subconjunctival and drip methods of administration

https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-2-18-22

Abstract

Purpose: to compare the dynamics of recombinant prourokinase (RPU) in humor of the anterior chamber of the eye with regard to administration technique (instillations vs. subconjunctival injection) using fluorescent spectrophotometry. Material and methods. 62 samples of anterior chamber humor were obtained from 62 patients (62 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery, with rigid pupil due exfoliation syndrome or after an earlier acute iridocyclitis. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 received the medication by forced instillations of RPU solution with the concentration of 330 IU per 1 ml of 0.9 % sodium chloride continuously for 10 minutes, the rate being 30 drops per minute. Group 2 (31 patients, 31 eyes) received a subconjunctival injection of 0.5 ml of 0.9 % sodium chloride solution that contained 5,000 IU of RPU. For each sample, the time elapsed from the moment of RPU administration to the moment of humor sampling was noted. RPU concentration in the samples was determined by fluorescent spectrophotometry using the HITACHI 650-60 device (Japan). Results. Inforced instillations, RPU is detected in the humor of the anterior chamber starting from the 5th minute after the instillation, with rapid growth of concentration, which attains the level of 3100 IU/ml in 30 to 60 minutes. Then, however, the concentration drops, with the half-life period being 160 to 180 minutes. In subconjunctival injections RPU is detected after the same time span after the procedure; however, its concentration grows for 120 to 160 minutes, reaching the level of 2500 IU/ml, and only then begins to fall gradually, the half-life period being as long as 320-360 minutes. Conclusions. RPU may be used for the treatment of fibrinoid syndrome with practically the same efficacy by subconjunctival injections or by force instillation. This is explained by the fact that the enzyme is found in anterior chamber humor in sufficient concentrations in either case. The pharmacokinetics of therapeutic concentration of the medicine in the humor of the anterior chamber envisages a single subconjunctival administration and permits two instillations in the 24-hour period Russian ophthalmological journal. 2017; 10 (2): 18-22. (in Russian). doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-2-18-22.

About the Authors

E. V. Boyko
S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Clinic, St. Petersburg, Russia
Russian Federation


T. G. Sazhin
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg,Russia
Russian Federation


A. S. Suvorov
S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg,Russia
Russian Federation


S. I. Alekperov
State Research and Testing Institute of Military Medicine, St. Petersburg, Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Даниличев В.Ф., Бойко Э.В., Сажин Т.Г. Энзимотерапия фибриноидного синдрома после экстракции катаракты. Офтальмохирургия. 2005; 3: 25-8.

2. Jaffe G.J., Green G.DJ., McKay B.S., et al. Intravitreal clearance of tissue plasminogen аctivator in the rabbit. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1998; 106: 969-71.

3. Han D.P., Wang Q., Hartz A., et al. Postoperative fibrin formation and visual outcome after pars plana vitrectomy. Retina. 1999; 3: 225-30.

4. Бочаров В.Е., Иванов М.Н., Двали М.Л. Системное применение кортикостероидов для предупреждения фибринозного иридоциклита при артифакии. Вестник офтальмологии. 1993; 2: 17-9.

5. Даниличев В.Ф. Офтальмология. Энзимотерапия и экстракорпоральная гемокоррекция. Санкт-Петербург; 2002.

6. Нарбут И.П., Нуриева С.М. Эффективность применения ферментов в лечении токсико-аллергических реакций после экстракции катаракты с имплантацией интраокулярных линз. Вестник офтальмологии. 1998; 5: 21-3.

7. Волков В.В., Данилов А.В., Рапис Е.Г. Гемофтальм. Ленинград: Медицина; 1990.

8. Егоров А.Е., Нестеров А.П. Экспериментальное обоснование эффективности зон повышенной проницаемости в плоской части цилиарного тела, создаваемых с помощью диод-лазерных аппликаций. Клиническая офтальмология. 2001; 2: 44-6.

9. Янченко С.В. Длительная внутрикаротидная инфузия лекарственных препаратов в лечении острой сосудистой оптической нейропатии. Ростов-на-Дону; 2003.

10. Бойко Э.В., Даниличев В.Ф., Сажин Т.Г. Влияние способа введения «Гемазы» на эффективность лечения гемофтальма при диабетической ретинопатии. Офтальмологические ведомости. 2008; 2: 42-7.

11. Damji K.F., Hill V. Tissue plasminogen activator for treatment of fibrin in endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 2001; 36 (5): 269-71.

12. Улащик В.С., Пономаренко Г.Н. Лекарственный электрофорез. Санкт-Петербург; 2010.

13. Черикчи Л.Е. Физиотерапия в офтальмологии. Киев; 1979.

14. Morgan C.M., Schatz H., Vine A.K. Ocular complications associated with injections. Ophthalmology. 1988; 95: 660-5.


Review

For citations:


Boyko E.V., Sazhin T.G., Suvorov A.S., Alekperov S.I. A comparative study of pharmacokinetics of recombinant prourokinasein subconjunctival and drip methods of administration. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2017;10(2):18-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-2-18-22

Views: 686


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0076 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5760 (Online)