Changes in the posterior segment of the eye in patients with keratoconus
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-1-99-102
Abstract
The literary review focuses on the studies of the posterior segment of the eye in patients with keratoconus. Anomalies in the development of the optic disk and changes in the macular area in keratoconus as well as in keratoconus combined with optic neuritis were detected using OCT, laser tomography and visual evoked potentials. The issue has not received complete solution yet. The publications are few due to the fact that it is difficult to visualize the fundus in patients with keratoconus because of high refraction errors and astigmatism of the cornea, which hampers the assessment of changes in the eye fundus. For citation: Ioyleva E.E., Safonenko A.Y. Changes in the posterior segment of the eye in patients with keratoconus. Russian ophthalmological journal. 2018; 11 (1): 99-102. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-1-99-102 (In Russian).
About the Authors
E. E. Ioyleva
Svyatoslav Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. Y. Safonenko
Svyatoslav Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Center
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ascaso F.J., Del Buey M.A., Huerva V., Latre B., Palomar A. Noonan's syndrome with keratoconus and optic disc coloboma. European journal of ophthalmology. 1993; 3(2 Apr.-Jun.): 101-3.
2. Jonas J.B., Königsreuther K.A. Macrodiscs in eyes with flat and large corneas. German journal of ophthalmology. 1994; 3(3 May): 179-81.
3. Moschos M., Droutsas D., Panagakis E., Tsioulias G., Tsalouki M. Keratoconus and tapetoretinal degeneration. Cornea. 1996; 15(5 Sep.): 473-6.
4. Fasciani R., Mosca L., Giannico M.L., Legrottaglie E.F., Balestrazzi E. Unusual coexistence of bilateral keratoconus and optic disc pit: a case report. European journal of ophthalmology. 2008; 18(1 Jan.-Feb.): 134-7.
5. Aslankurt M., Aslan L., Aksoy A., Başkan A.M. A case of unusual coexistence of keratoconus and optic disk pit. Seminars in Ophthalmology. 2015; 30(2 Mar.): 142-5. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2013.833263
6. Eandi C.M., Del Priore L.V., Bertelli E, Ober M.D., Yannuzzi L.A. Central serous chorioretinopathy in patients with keratoconus. Retina. 2008; 28(1 Jan.): 94-6. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3180986299
7. Ciftci S. Unilateral tilted disc and ipsilateral keratoconus in the same eye. BMJ case reports. 2011; 17 (Jun) Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3118845/pdf/bcr.06.2010.3126.pdf. doi: 10.1136/bcr.06.2010.3126.
8. Rabinowitz Y.S. Keratoconus. Survey of ophthalmology. 1998; 42 (Jan-Feb): 297-319.
9. Nemet A.Y., Vinker S., Bahar I., Kaiserman I. The association of keratoconus with immune disorders. Cornea. 2010; 29(11 Nov.): 1261-4. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cb410b
10. Иойлева Е.Э., Кривошеева М.С. Оптический неврит в сочетании с кератоконусом при рассеянном склерозе. Вестник Тамбовского государственного университета. 2015; 20(3): 585-90.
11. Cankaya B., Beyazyildiz E., Ileri D., Yilmazbas P. Optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer parameters of eyes with keratoconus. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2012; 43(5 Sep.-Oct.): 401-7.
12. Pakravan M., Parsa A., Sanagou M., Parsa C.F. Central corneal thickness and correlation to optic disc size: a potential link for susceptibility to glaucoma. The British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2007; 91(1 Jan.): 26-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.106039
13. Sahebjada S., Amirul Islam F.M., Wickremasinghe S., Daniell M., Baird P.N. Assessment of macular parameter changes in patients with keratoconus using optical coherence tomography. Journal of ophthalmology. 2015; 2015 (Article ID 245953): 6. doi: 10.1155/2015/245953
14. Brautaset R. L., Rosén R., Cerviño A., Miller W. L., Bergmanson J., Nilsson M. Comparison of macular thickness in patients with keratoconus and control subjects using the Cirrus HD-OCT. BioMed research international. 2015; 2015 (Article ID 832863): 5. doi: 10.1155/2015/832863
15. Wagner H., Barr J.T., Zadnik K. Collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study: methods and findings to date. Contact lens and anterior eye: the Journal of the British Contact Lens Association. 2007; 30(4 Sep.): 223-32.
16. Hwang Y. H., Lee S.M., Kim Y.Y., Lee J.Y., Yoo C. Astigmatism and optical coherence tomography measurements. Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. 2012; 250 (2 Feb.): 247-54.
17. Saenz-Frances F., Jañez L., Borrego-Sanz L., et al. Correlations between corneal and optic nerve head variables in healthy subjects and patients with primary open angle glaucoma. International journal of ophthalmology. 2015; 8(6): 1156-61. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.14
18. Jonas J. B., Kling F., Grundler A. E. Optic disc shape, corneal astigmatism, and amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104(11 Nov.): 1934-7.
19. Ozsoy E., Gunduz A., Demirel E.E., Cumurcu T. Evaluation of anterior segment's structures in tilted disc syndrome. Journal of ophthalmology. 2016; 2016 (Article ID5185207): 4. doi: 10.1155/2016/5185207
20. Ornek K., Ozdemir M. Central corneal thickness in tilted disc syndrome. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2008; 85(5 May): 350-2. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31816bf578
21. Dohadwala A. A., Damji K. F. Familial occurrence of artefactual ocular hypertension from thick corneas and of primary open angle glaucoma in a French Canadian kindred. Ophthalmic Genetics. 2000; 21(1 Mar.): 1-7.
Review
For citations:
Ioyleva E.E., Safonenko A.Y. Changes in the posterior segment of the eye in patients with keratoconus. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2018;11(1):99-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-1-99-102
Views:
766
Email this article 