Effectiveness and safety of demodecosis blepharitis therapy under dry eye conditions

Purpose: to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of complex therapy in patients with demodex blepharitis and dry eye. Methods. 25 patients with mixed demodex blepharitis and dry eye (50 eyes; 10 men, 15 women; 61.9 ± 5.6 years) were examined before and after treatment with 0.5 % levofloxacin instillation (5 times a day, 5 days); sulfur and metronidazole gel applications (Blefarogel-forte) as part of therapeutic eyelid hygiene (Blepharogel-cleansing, Blepharolotion; starting from day 6, 2 times a day, 45 days); 0.24 % sodium hyaluronate instillation (3 times a day). Therapy effectiveness criteria were as follows: D. folliculorum mite population reduction; positive dynamics of blepharitis objective signs and meibomian gland dysfunction severity (MGD-S, points). Therapy safety criteria included the absence of negative dynamics of OSDI, tear film breakup time (TBUT, s), inferior tear meniscus height (ITMH, µm) and xerosis index (XI, points). Results. As a result of the therapy, statistically significant changes were noted, including mite population reduction (from 9.23 ± 0.81 to 3.54 ± 0.80 imagos); eyelid margins edema intensity decrease (from 3.18 ± 0.39 to 1.30 ± 0.45 points) and hyperemia decrease (from 2.90 ± 0.29 to 0.9 ± 0.3 points); MGD-S decrease (from 2.1 ± 0.3 to 0.95 ± 0.21 points); OSDI decrease (from 43.23 ± 4.70 to 25.10 ± 2.65 points); TBUT increase (from 4.05 ± 0.50 to 5.55 ± 0.50 s); XI decrease (from 5.36 ± 0.49 to 4.04 ± 0.60 points). Conclusion. The treatment of demodex blepharitis and dry eye treatment, including sulfur and metronidazole gel applications, therapeutic eyelid hygiene and 0.5 % levofloxacin and 0.24 % sodium hyaluronate instillation demonstrated a high efficiency and a good safety profile.

1. Lindsley K, Matsumura S, Hatef E, Akpek EK. Interventions for chronic blepharitis. Cochran Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012: Issue 5. Art. No CD005556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005556.pub2

2. Kubanov A.A., Gallyamova Yu.A., Grevtseva A.S., eds Demodecosis: textbook. GBOU DPO Moscow: GBOU “Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education”. 2014 (In Russ.).

3. Maychuk D.Yu., Loshkareva A.O. Effectiveness and safety of Blefarovit cosmetic product usage in patients with chronic blepharoconjunctivitis and dry eye syndrome, combined with an active demodicosis component. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2022; 3: 41–9 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/0235-4160-2022-3-41-49

4. English FP, Nutting WB. Demodicosis of ophthalmic concern. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981; 91 (3): 362–72. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(81)90291-9

5. Eremenko A.I., Yanchenko S.V. Optimization of the demodex blepharitis-related dry eye treatment. Refractionnaya khirurgia i oftalmologia. 2010; 10 (3): 51–6 (In Russ.).

6. Polunin G.S., Polunina E.G. From dry eye to team film disease. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2012; 9 (2): 4–7 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816- 5095-2012-2-4-7

7. Nichols KN, Foulks GN, Bron AJ, et al. The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: Executive Summary. IOVS. Special Issue. 2011; 52 (4): 1923–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997a

8. Brzhesky V.V., Egorova G.B., Egorov E.A. Dry eye and ocular surface diseases. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. 2016 (In Russ.).

9. Craig JP, Nelson J, Azar DT, et al. TFOS DEWS II Report Executive Summary. The Ocular Surface. 2017; XXX: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.08.003

10. Stapleton F, Optom MC, Alves M, et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. The Ocular Surface. 2017; 15: 334–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003

11. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V., et al. Dry eye epidemiology in patients before refractive operations. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2018; 15 (1): 92–101 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-1-92-101

12. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V., et al. Dry eye epidemiology in patients before cataract surgery. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020; 17 (2): 281–9 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2020-2-281-289

13. Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L. Dry eye after refractive surgery. Comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122 (4): 669–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004

14. Levitt AE, Galor A, Weiss JS. Chronic dry eye symptoms after LASIK: parallels and lessons to be learned from other persistent post-operative pain disorders. Mol Pain. 2015 Apr 21; 11: 21. doi: 10.1186/s12990-015-0020-7

15. Lu Q, Li Y, Zhu X. Dry eye and phacoemulsification cataract surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 2021; 8: 649030. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.649030

16. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V., et al. Ocular surface changes after cataract phacoemulsification. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2021; 137 (6): 55–60 (In Russ). doi:10.17116/oftalma202113706155

17. Peral A, Alonso J, Garсia-Garсia C, et al. Importance of lid hygiene before ocular surgery: qualitative and quantitative analysis of eyelid and conjunctiva microbiota. Eye Contact Lens. 2016 Nov; 42 (6): 366–70. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000221

18. Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V., Sakhnov S.N., et al. Eye lid hygiene in chronic allergic blepharoconjunctivitis patients before laser refractive surgery. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2016: 5: 83–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2016132586-92

19. Sakhnov S.N., Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev AV., et al. Therapeutic hygiene of eyelids in dry eye disease prior to cataract phacoemulsification. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2023; 139 (1): 46–54 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma202313901146

20. Pershing S, Lum F, Hsu S, et al. Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery in the United States: a report from the intelligent research in sight registry, 2023-2017. Ophthalmology. 2020: 127 (2): 151–8. doi: 10.1016/j. phtha.2019.08.026

21. Korb DR. The tear film — its role today and in future. The tear film, structure, function and examination. Butterworth — Heimann. 2002.

22. Lopez Garcia JS, Garcia Lozano I, Martinez Garchitorena J. Measure of the fatty layer thickness of precorneal tear film by interference colours in different types of dry eye. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2003 May; 78 (5): 257–64 (In Spanish). PMID: 12789629.

23. Bijesterveld OP. Diagnostic tests in the sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969 Jul; 82 (1): 10–4. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1969.00990020012003

24. Shipilov V.A., Yanchenko S.V., Sakhnov S.N., et al. Latch device for obtaining photos of ocular surface. Sovremennie problemi nauki i obrazovaniya. 2013; 6: 689–90 (In Russ.). www.science-education.ru/113-11843

25. Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V., Sakhnov S.N. The choice of dry eye therapy depending on ocular surface condition. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021; 18 (2): 346–54 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-346-354

26. Yanchenko S.V., Malyshev A.V., Odilova G.R., et al. New possibilities for hyposecretory dry eye treatment. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2023; 20 (3): 542–8 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095- 2023-3-542-548

27. Guillon M, Maissa C, Wong S. Symptomatic relief associated with eyelid hygiene in anterior blepharitis and MGD. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice. 2012 September; 38 (5): 306–12. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3182658699

28. Trubilin V.N., Polunina E.G., Markova E.Yu., et al. Therapeutic hygiene of the eyelids in algorithms for the prevention and treatment of diseases of the eye surface. Р. 1. Оphthalmology in Russia. 2016; 13 (2): 122–7 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18008/181650952016212212

29. Shpak A.A. Issues of the statistical analysis in the Russian ophthalmic journals. The Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2016; 1: 73–7 (In Russ.). doi: 10.25276/0235-4160-2016-1-73-77