Preview

Russian Ophthalmological Journal

Advanced search

Evaluation of efficacy of hyaluronic acid preservative-free preparation 0.3 % in the prevention of secondary dry eye syndrome in patients after cataract phacoemulsification

https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-35-41

Abstract

Purpose: to determine the clinical efficacy of a non-preservative drug based on sodium hyaluronate 0.3 % (Gilan) in the correction of secondary dry eye syndrome (DES) manifestations in patients after cataract phacoemulsification (CPE), based on monitoring clinical and functional characteristics of the ocular surface. Materials and methods. 62 patients with immature cataracts underwent CPE with IOL implantation. Special examination techniques (Schirmer's test, Norn test, assessment of conjunctival hyperemia on the ORA scale (Ocular Redness Analysis)) were performed before the operation, 7 days and 30 days after it. The main group of patients (31 patients) received, in addition to the standard postoperative treatment, a non-preservative drug based on sodium hyaluronate 0.3 % (Gilan), whilst the control group (31 patients) received standard therapy. Results. The parameters studied showed a significant worsening in patients of both groups by the 7 th day after surgery, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. 30 days after CPE, the values of the Schirmer I test in the main group increased from 7.4 ± 2.3 mm (7 days after surgery) to 12.6 ± 1.7 mm, which significantly exceeded the respective values in patients of the control group: from 7.2 ± 2.1 mm (7 days after surgery) to 8.7 ± 2.0 mm (p < 0.001). Norn test scores also increased from 4.3 ± 1.9 s (7 days after surgery) to 7.9 ± 1.3 s in the main group and from 4.1 ± 2.1 s (7 days after the operation) to 5.3 ± 1.2 s in the control group with a statistically significant difference between the groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The use of a non-preservative drug based on sodium hyaluronate 0.3 % (Gilan) as part of combined therapy after CPE helps to effectively reduce the main manifestations of dry eye syndrome and improves postoperative rehabilitation.

About the Authors

O. I. Lebedev
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Oleg I. Lebedev – Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, head of chair of ophthalmology.

12, Lenin Str., Omsk, 644099



A. V. Surov
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Surov – Cand. of Med. Sci., associate professor of chair of ophthalmology.

12, Lenin Str., Omsk, 644099



Ye. V. Akentyeva
Clinical Ophthalmologic Hospital named after V.P. Vykhodtsev
Russian Federation

Yevgeniya V. Akentyeva – ophthalmologist.

60, Lermontov Str., Omsk, 644024



G. M. Kozachenko
Clinical Ophthalmologic Hospital named after V.P. Vykhodtsev
Russian Federation

Galina M. Kozachenko – ophthalmologist.

60, Lermontov Str., Omsk, 644024



O. E. Shkutovich
State Public Association City Polyclinic No. 10
Russian Federation

Olga E. Shkutovich – ophthalmologist.

7b, Motornaya St., Omsk, 644109



S. Y. Trenina
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Svetlana Y. Trenina – resident.

12, Lenin Str., Omsk, 644099



I. A. Svinareva
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Irina A. Svinareva – resident.

12, Lenin Str., Omsk, 644099



References

1. Tonkonogiy S.V., Bai Lina U., Vasilyev A.V. Investigation of tear production dynamics in patients with age-related cataract before and after phacoemulsification. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2018; 11 (1): 6–9 (in Russian). doi: 10.17816/OV1116-9

2. Brzheskij V.V., Somov E.E. Corneal and conjunctival xerosis (diagnostic, clinic, therapy). Saint Petersburg: SAGA; 2002 (in Russian)

3. Astakhov Yu.S., Nikolaenko V.P., eds. Ophthalmology. Pharmacotherapy without mistakes. Guidelines for physicians. Moscow: E-noto; 2016 (in Russian)

4. Foster A. Vision 2020: the cataract challenge. Community eye health. 2000; 13 (34): 17–9.

5. Garcia-Catalan M.R., Jerez-Olivera E., Benitez-Del-Castillo-Sanchez J.M. Dry eye and quality of life. Arch. Soc. Esp. Oftalmol. 2009; 84 (9): 451–8. doi: 10.4321/s0365-66912009000900004

6. Na K.S., Han K., Park Y.G., et al. Depression, stress, quality of life, and dry eye disease in Korean women: a population-based study. Cornea. 2015; 34 (7): 733–8. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000464

7. Kasetsuwan N., Satitpitakul V., Changul T., Jariyakosol S. Incidence and pattern of dry eye after cataract surgery. PloS One. 2013; 8 (11): e78657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078657

8. Jiang D., Xiao X., Fu T., et al. Transient tear film dysfunction after cataract surgery in diabetic patients. PloS One. 2016; 11(1): e0146752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146752

9. Al-Aqaba M.A., Fares U., Suleman H., et al. Architecture and distribution of human corneal nerves. British J. Ophthalmol. 2010; 94 (6): 784–9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.173799

10. Somov E.E. Syndromes of lacrimal dysfunction. Saint Petersburg: Chelovek; 2011 (in Russian)

11. Cho Y.K., Kim M.S. Dry eye after cataract surgery and associated intraoperative risk factors. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2009; 23 (2): 65–73. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.2.65

12. De Paiva C.S., Chen Z., Koch D.D., et al. The incidence and risk factors for developing dry eye after myopic LASIK. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2006; 141 (3): 438–45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.10.006

13. Tasindi E. Синдром «сухого глаза» в послеоперационном периоде. Новое в офтальмологии. 2012; 3: 44–6.

14. Linna T.U., Vesaluoma M.H., Perez-Santonja J.J., et al. Effect of myopic LASIK on corneal sensitivity and morphology of subbasal nerves. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000; 41 (2): 393–7. https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2199874

15. Sahu P.K., Das G.K., Malik A., Biakthangi L. Dry eye following phacoemulsification surgery and its relation to associated intraoperative risk factors. Middle East Afr. J. Ophthalmol. 2015; 22 (4): 472–7. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.151871

16. Yu Y., Hua H., Wu M., et al. Evaluation of dry eye after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2015; 41(12): 2614–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.036

17. Cetinkaya S., Mestan E., Acir N.O., et al. The course of dry eye after phacoemulsification surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015; 15: 68. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0058-3

18. Eremenko A.I., Boyko A.A., Yanchenko S.V., et al. Prophylaxis of secondary dry eye syndrome after the cataract extraction with IOL implantation. RMZh. Klinicheskaya oftal’mologiya. 2006; (3): 122–5 (in Russian)

19. Polunin G.S., Kurenkov V.V., Safonova T.N., Polunina E.G. New clinical classification of dry eye syndrome. Kataraktal’naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2003; 3 (3): 53–6 (in Russian)

20. Maychuk Yu.F., Yani E.V. Clinical efficacy of hyaluronic acid preparations: Vismed® (eye drops) and Vismed Gel ® (eye gel) in monodoses in the treatment of dry eye. Kataraktal’naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2008; 8 (4): 35–42 (in Russian)

21. Lebedev O.I., Surov A.V., Akentyeva Ye.V. The progress of diagnostics of inflammatory diseases of the uveal tract in a Russian region. Oftal’mologicheskie vedomosti. 2014; 7 (2): 13–7 (in Russian)

22. Trubilin V.N., Sedneva T.A., Kapkova S.G. The tear substitutive therapy for prophylaxis and treatment of dry eye after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2013; 10 (1): 56–62 (in Russian)


Review

For citations:


Lebedev O.I., Surov A.V., Akentyeva Ye.V., Kozachenko G.M., Shkutovich O.E., Trenina S.Y., Svinareva I.A. Evaluation of efficacy of hyaluronic acid preservative-free preparation 0.3 % in the prevention of secondary dry eye syndrome in patients after cataract phacoemulsification. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(1):35-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-35-41

Views: 1372


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0076 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5760 (Online)