Hybrid contact lenses for the correction of primary and induced ametropias
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-102-107
Abstract
The review presents the data on the use of hybrid contact lenses (HCL), a modern method of contact correction of ametropias of diverse origins. A HCL has a central rigid optical zone made of highly gas-permeable material and a flexible peripheral part made of hydrophilic material. These lenses combine the optical effect of gas-permeable corneal lens with the comfort and stable fitting of soft contact lenses. Compared with the corneal (RGP) lenses, HCLs are more comfortable, often are better centrated and more stably fit on the eye. HCLs are successfully used in various refractive disorders: ametropias (with regular cornea), irregular astigmatism, presbyopia, including that combined with astigmatism. This type of lens is a good option of contact correction for patients who have high requirements to the quality of vision.
About the Authors
V. V. Neroev
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Neroev - academician of RAS, Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, director
14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
A. V. Myagkov
Academy of Medical Optics and Optometry
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander V. Myagkov - Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, director
Mikhalkovskaya St., 63B/4, Moscow, 125438
O. V. Guryanova
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Guryanova - ophthalmologist
14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
A. T. Khandzhyan
Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anush T. Khandzhyan - Cand. of Med. Sci., senior researcher, department of retina and optic nerve pathology
14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, 105062
A. I. Yakunina
Voronezh N.N. Burdenko State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anastasia I. Yakunina - ophthalmologist of Department of Ophthalmology
Studencheskaya St., 10, Voronezh, 394036
References
1. White N., Jennings C., Pelka K. Hybrid contact lens: USA patent 9625738, 2017. Available at: https://patents.justia.com/patent/9625738
2. Page L.J. Contact lenses. USA patent 3,973,838. 1973. Available at: https://patents.justia.com/patent/3973838
3. Potter R. The History of hybrid contact lenses. Where these lenses started and where they are today. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2015 November; 30 (30): 32–5. Available at: https://www.clspectrum.com/issues/2015/november-2015/the-history-of-hybrid-contactlenses
4. Lee K.L.Y., Nguyen D.P.-A., Edrington T.B., Weissman B.A. Calculated in situ tear oxygen tension under hybrid contact lenses. Eye & contact lens. 2015; 41 (2): 111–6. doi: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000075
5. Davis R., Eiden. B. Hybrid contact lens management. This fitting and patient selection approach can increase your success with hybrid lens fitting. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2010 April. Available at: https://www.clspectrum.com/issues/2010/april-2010/hybridcontact-lens-management
6. Montani G. Hybrid lens strategies for regular and irregular corneas. Tips for successfully fitting today’s hybrid contact lens designs on any type of cornea. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2018 October; 33: 30–5. Available at: https://www.clspectrum.com/issues/2018/october-2018/hybrid-lens-strategies-for-regular-andirregular-c
7. Woo S.L. Hybrid multifocal lenses: design, fitting, evaluation, and problem-solving. Contact Lens Spectrum. Issue: Optimizing practice success with GP and custom soft multifocal lenses. 2017 September; 32: 20–2. Available at: https://www.clspectrum.com/supplements/2017/september-2017/optimizing-practice-successwith-gp-and-custom-sof/hybrid-multifocal-lenses-design,fitting,-evaluat
8. Myagkov A.V. Guide of medical optics. Part II. Contact correction. Moscow: Aprel’; 2018; 2 (in Russian).
9. Samra W.A., El-Emam D.S., Kasem M.A. Clinical performance of a spherical hybrid lens design in high regular astigmatism. Eye & contact lens. 2018; 44: S66-S70. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000326
10. Goertz A.D., Stewart W.C., Burns W.R., Stewart J.A., Nelson L.A. Review of the impact of presbyopia on quality of life in the developing and developed world. Acta ophthalmologica. 2014; 92 (6): 497–500. doi: 10.1111/aos.12308
11. Piñero D.P., Carracedo G., Ruiz-Fortes P., Perez-Cambrodi R.J. Comparative analysis of the visual performance and aberrometric outcomes with a new hybrid and two silicone hydrogel multifocal contact lenses: a pilot study. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2015; 98 (5): 451–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12299
12. Duette: Patient Care and Handling Guide. Available at: http://synergeyes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/M0055-C-DuetteLens-Care-Handling-Brochure_single-pages.pdf
13. Lipson M.J., Musch D.C. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2007 July; 84: 593–7. doi: 10.1097/opx.0b013e31811ece4a
14. Boriskina L.N., Solodkova E.G., Melihova I.A. The modification of corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus treatment. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014; 12 (173): 68–71 (in Russian).
15. Zotov V.V., Pashtaev N.P., Pozdeeva N.A. The corneal collagen cross-linking in keratokonus treatment. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2015; 131 (4): 88–93 (in Russian).
16. Yildiz E.H., Erdurmus M., Elibol E.S., Acar B., Vural E.T. Contact lens impact on quality of life in keratoconus patients: rigid gas permeable versus soft silicone-hydrogel keratoconus lenses. Int. Journ. Ophthalmol. 2015; 8 (5): 1074–7. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.22223959.2015.05.38
17. Moschos M.M. Contact lenses for keratoconus – current practice. Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2017; 11: 241–51. doi: 10.2174/1874364101711010241
18. Gore D.M., Shortt A.J., Allan B.D. New clinical pathways for keratoconus. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27 (3): 329–39. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.257
19. Severinsky B., Wajnsztajn D., Frucht Pery J. Silicone hydrogel mini scleral contact lenses in early stage after corneal collagen cross linking for keratoconus: a retrospective case series. Clin. Exp. Optometry. 2013; 96 (6): 542–6. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12146
20. Hassani M., Jafarzadehpur E., Mirzajani A., Yekta A., Khabazkhoob M. Comparison of the visual acuity outcome between Clearkone and RGP lenses. Journ. Curr. Ophthalmol. 2018; 30 (1): 85–6. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.006
21. Altay Y., Balta O., Burcu A., Ornek F. Hybrid contact lenses for visual management of patients after keratoplasty. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2018 Apr; 21 (4): 451–5. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_103_17
Review
For citations:
Neroev V.V., Myagkov A.V., Guryanova O.V., Khandzhyan A.T., Yakunina A.I. Hybrid contact lenses for the correction of primary and induced ametropias. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2020;13(1):102-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2020-13-1-102-107
Views:
1116
Email this article 