A comparative analysis of myopia development in children with bilateral and unilateral pseudophakia
https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-4-23-29
Abstract
After the extraction of congenital cataract in infancy, postoperative refraction changes differently in patients with bilateral and unilateral pseudophakia. Purpose: to compare myopia development in children with bilateral and unilateral pseudophakia. Material and methods. We examined 33 children (63 eyes) with bilateral and 21 children with unilateral pseudophakia for long-term results of congenital cataract extraction performed in their infancy, The evaluated parameters included the incidence and degree of myopia, refraction, general postsurgical astigmatism, and axial length of the eye. Refraction was measured by Nidek ARK-530A (Japan). The axial length was measured by ultrasound B-scan (Voluson E8, GE) or by optical biometry (AL-Scan, Nidek). Results. In bilateral pseudophakia, high myopia was detected if astigmatism was more than 3.25 D or oblique. In the latter case, the eyeball showed a greater growth as compared to with-the-rule astigmatism (4.67 mm and 3.26 mm, respectively; p < 0.05). With incomplete correction of astigmatism in the case of bilateral pseudophakia, myopia progressed to a high degree in nearly half of the cases (48.1 %), and a greater growth of the eye was detected compared with complete correction (4.45 mm and 3.42 mm respectively; p > 0.05). The type and degree of astigmatism did not affect the development and progression of myopia in unilateral pseudophakia. Conclusion. The effect of undercorrected astigmatic defocus on the development and progression of myopia in bilateral pseudophakia is apparently associated with a equivalent visual load on both eyes, while this load is significantly reduced in unilateral pseudophakia so that it fails to affect the development of myopia in such cases.
About the Authors
L. A. KatarginaRussian Federation
Lyudmila A. Katargina — Dr. of Med. Sci., professor, head of the department of children’s eye pathology, deputy director
105062, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow
T. B. Kruglova
Russian Federation
Tat'yana B. Kruglova — Dr. of Med. Sci., senior researcher, department of children’s eye pathology
105062, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow
A. S. Mamykina
Russian Federation
Aleksandra S. Mamykina — PhD student, department of children’s eye pathology
105062, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow
N. S. Egiyan
Russian Federation
Naira S. Egiyan — Cand. of Med. Sci., ophthalmologist, department of children’s eye pathology
105062, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow
N. N. Arestova
Russian Federation
Nataliya N. Arestova — Dr. of Med. Sci., leading researcher, department of children eye pathology, associate professor, chair of ophthalmology
105062, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow
20, Bldg. 1, Delegatskaya St., Moscow, 127473
References
1. Zaidullin I.S., Aznabayev R.A. Change settings for the eye in long-term follow-up after cataract extraction with IOL implantation in children operated on in age from 1 to 12 months. Ophthalmosurgery. 2010; 6: 26–9 (in Russian).
2. Sun I.-T., Kuo H.-K., Chen Y.-J., et al. Long-term results of extraction of childhood cataracts and intraocular lens implantation. Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013. 3 (4): 151–5. doi:10.1016/j.tjo.2013.10.005
3. Ganesh S., Gupta R., Sethi S., Gurund C., Mehta R. Myopic shift after IOL implantation in children less than two years of age. Nepal J. Ophthalmol. 2018; 10 (19): 11–5. doi:10.3126/nepjoph.v10i1.21662
4. Katargina L.A., Kruglova T.B., Egiyan N.S., Trifonova O.B. The dynamics of the anterior-posterior axis of the eye and refraction in children with pseudophakia after early surgery of the congenital cataract (preliminary report). Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal'mologiya. 2015; 10 (2): 20–4 (in Russian).
5. Twelker J.D., Miller J.M., Sherrill D.L., Harvey E.M. Astigmatism and myopia in Tohono O'odham Native American children. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2013; 90 (11): 1267–73. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000065
6. Fan D.S.P., Rao S.K., Cheung E.Y.Y., et al. Astigmatism in Chinese preschool children: prevalence, change, and effect on refractive development. Br. J. of Ophthalmol. 2004; 88 (7): 938–41. doi:10.1136/bjo.2003.030338
7. Gwiazda J., Grice K., Held R., McLellan J., Thorn F. Astigmatism and the development of myopia in children. Vision Res. 2000; 40 (8): 1019–26. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00237-0
8. Kruglova T.B., Egiyan N.S., Mamykina A.S., Katargina L.A. The frequency of myopia development after extraction of congenital cataracts in infancy with different keratometric and biometric parameters of pseudophakic eyes. Rossiyskaya pediatricheskaya oftal'mologiya. 2020; 15 (3): 11–16 (in Russian). doi:0.17816/rpo2020-15-3-11-16
9. Weakley D.R., Birch E., McClatchey S.K., et al. The association between myopic shift and visual acuity outcome in pediatric aphakia. J. AAPOS. 2003; 7 (2): 86–90. doi:10.1016/mpa.2003.S1091853103000090
10. Wilson M.E., Trivedi R.H., Weakley D.R. Jr., et al. Globe axial length growth at age 10.5 years in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2020; 216 (Aug.): 147–55. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.04.010
11. McClatchey S.K., Dahan E., Maselli E., et al. A comparison of the rate of refractive growth in pediatric aphakic and pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107 (1): 118–22. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00033-0
12. Kruglova T.B., Kononov L.B. Peculiarities of intraocular lens power calculation in infants under 1 year of age with congenital cataract. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 2013; 129 (4): 66–9 (in Russian)].
13. Kruglova T.B., Katargina L.A., Egiyan N.S., Trifonova O.B., Mamykina A.S. Long-term functional outcomes after congenital cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation in children of the first year of life. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2020; 136 (6): 142–6 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136062142
Review
For citations:
Katargina L.A., Kruglova T.B., Mamykina A.S., Egiyan N.S., Arestova N.N. A comparative analysis of myopia development in children with bilateral and unilateral pseudophakia. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2022;15(4):23-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2022-15-4-23-29