Preview

Russian Ophthalmological Journal

Advanced search

Indications for enucleation after uveal melanoma brachytherapy

https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2016-9-4-46-51

Abstract

Purpose: to analyze indications for enucleation in uveal melanoma (UM) patients after brachytherapy (BT). Material and methods. 52 patients with UM (31 females and 21 males) aged 25 to 74 years (mean age 53.2 ± 12.3) underwent an enucleation after a previously administered BT. Tumor sizes before BT were 6.1 ± 2.1 (1.2-11) mm in thickness and 13.0 ±2.9 (6-19) mm in diameter. Immediately before enucleation, they were 5.3 ± 3.4 (1-17) mm and 12.4 ± 3.6 (5-20) mm respectively. The time span between BT and enucleation varied from 2 to 103 months (median, 25 months). 40 patients (77 %) had choroidal localization of UM (of these,16 had juxtapapillary localization), 10 patients (19.2 %) had ciliochoroidal localization, and 2 patients (3.8 %) had UM in the anterior areas of the eye (iris and ciliary body). Results. In more than a half of the patients (30 patients, or 58 %) tumor regrowth was detected 5-96 months after BT. The second frequent cause for enucleation was neovascular glaucoma found in 21 patients (40 %). Extraocular extension of UM, identified in 12 patients (23 %), took place 3-82 months after BT and turned out to be the third complication as far as frequency of occurrence is concerned. Conclusion. Tumor regrowth remained to be the main cause for secondary enucleation in UM patients after BT. As a matter of fact, complications that can require immediate enucleationmay develop at any time after BT (although the peak falls upon the first 2 years after BT. This fact confirms the need of lifelong follow-up of such patients. Hence, unfounded extension of indications for BT may result in ineffective prolongation of local treatment, a number of radiation complications requiring immediate secondary surgical treatment // Russian Ophthalmological Journal, 2016; 4: 46-51. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2016-9-4-46-51.

About the Authors

S. V. Saakyan
Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation


A. G. Amiryan
Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation


V. V. Valskiy
Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation


I. S. Mironova
Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation


A. Yu. Tsygankov
Moscow State Medical Stomatological University
Russian Federation


References

1. Damato B. Does ocular treatment of uveal melanoma influence survival? Br. J. Cancer. 2010; 103(3): 285-90.

2. Gündüz K., Shields C.L., Shields J.A., et al. Plaque radiotherapy of uveal melanoma with predominant ciliary body involvement. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117:170-7.

3. Shields C.L., Naseripour M., Cater J., et al. Plaque radiotherapy for large posterior uveal melanomas (≥8-mm thick) in 354 consecutive patients. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109: 1838-49.

4. Бровкина А.Ф. Современные аспекты лечения меланом хориоидеи: проблемы, дискуссионные вопросы. Вестник офтальмологии. 2006; 122(1): 13-5.

5. Lommatzsch P.K. Results after beta-irradiation (106Ru/106Rh) of choroidal melanomas: 20 years’ experience. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1986; 70: 844-51.

6. Lommatzsch P.K., Werschnik C., Schuster E. Long-term follow-up of Ru-106/Rh-106 brachytherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 238: 129-37.

7. Shields J.A., Shields C.L. Management of posterior uveal melanoma: past, present, and future. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122: 414-28.

8. Bergman L., Nilsson Bo, Lundell G., Lundell M., Seregard S. Ruthenium Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma, 1979-2003 Survival and Functional Outcomes in the Swedish Population. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112: 834-40.

9. Papageorgiou K.I., Cohen V.M., Bunce C., Kinsella M., Hungerford J.L. Predicting local control of choroidal melanomas following 106Ru plaque brachytherapy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2011; 95: 166-70.

10. Sagoo M.S., Shields C.L., Mashayekhi A., et al. Plaque radiotherapy for juxtapapillary choroidal melanoma: tumor control in 650 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 402-7.

11. Barker C.A., Francis J.H., Cohen G.N., et al. 106Ru plaque brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: factors associated with local tumor recurrence. Brachytherapy. 2014; 13: 584-90.

12. Summanen P., Immonen I., Kivela T., et al. Radiation related complications after ruthenium plaque radiotherapy of uveal melanoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1996; 80: 732-9.

13. Бровкина А.Ф., Зарубей Г.Д., Каплина А.В., Хорасанян-Таде А.А. О причинах энуклеации после комбинированного лечения увеальной меланомы. Вестник офтальмологии. 1981; 3: 48-51.

14. Fabian I.D., Tomkins-Netzer O., Stoker I., et al. Secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma: a 7-year retrospective analysis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec; 160(6): 1104-10

15. Shields C.L., Shields J.A., Karlsson U., Markoe A.M., Brady L.W. Reasons for enucleation after plaque radiotherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. Clinical findings. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96: 919-23.

16. Gaspar de Souza Neves D.F., Ferragut M.A., Ferreira D.V., et al. Reirradiation of the eye with plaque brachytherapy: A single institution experience report of eight consecutive patients submitted to retreatment after local relapse of malignant disease of the eye. Brachytherapy. 2014; 13: 281-4.

17. Бровкина А.Ф., Каплина А.В., Зарубей Г.Д. Постлучевая вторичная глаукома и меры ее профилактики. Вестник офтальмологии. 1991; 5: 16-20.

18. Kim M.K., Char D.H., Castro J.L., et al. Neovascular glaucoma after helium ion irradiation for uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 1986; 93: 189-92.

19. Бровкина А.Ф., Хиониди Я.Н., Нечеснюк С.Ю. Механизм развития вторичной глаукомы после локального разрушения меланом хориоидеи. Глаукома. 2010; 10: 52-5.

20. Амирян А.Г., Саакян С.В., Вальский В.В. Экстрабульбарный рост после органосохраняющего лечения увеальной меланомы. Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2011; 4(3): 15-9.

21. Нероев В.В., Саакян С.В., Амирян А.Г., Вальский В.В. Факторы риска экстрабульбарного роста после локального лечения увеальной меланомы. Вестник офтальмологии. 2011; 2: 21-5.

22. Coupland S.E., Campbell I., Damato B. Routes of extraocular extension of uveal melanoma. Risk factors and influence on survival probability. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115: 1778-5.

23. Groenewald C., Konstantinidis L., Damato B. Effects of radiotherapy on uveal melanomas and adjacent tissues. Eye. 2013; 27: 163-71.

24. Бровкина А.Ф., Стоюхина А.С., Чесалин И.П. Брахитерапия меланом хориоидеи и вторичная энуклеация. Офтальмологические ведомости. 2014; 7(2): 69-77.

25. Gündüz K., Shields C.L., Shields J.A., et al. Radiation complications and tumor control after plaque radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma with macular involvement. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1999; 127: 579-89.

26. Саакян С.В., Амирян А.Г., Цыганков А.Ю., Склярова Н.В., Залетаев Д.В. Клинические, патоморфологические и молекулярно-генетические особенности увеальной меланомы с высоким риском метастазирования. Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2015; 9(2): 47-52.

27. Саакян С.В., Амирян А.Г., Цыганков А.Ю., Логинов В.И., Бурденный А.М. Ассоциация гена ABCB1с риском развития увеальной меланомы. Архив патологии. 2014; 76(2): 3-7.


Review

For citations:


Saakyan S.V., Amiryan A.G., Valskiy V.V., Mironova I.S., Tsygankov A.Yu. Indications for enucleation after uveal melanoma brachytherapy. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2016;9(4):46-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2016-9-4-46-51

Views: 742


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2072-0076 (Print)
ISSN 2587-5760 (Online)